13.07.2015 Views

This Book in PDF - Gary North

This Book in PDF - Gary North

This Book in PDF - Gary North

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction 3life, and they usually are unexpected. Not always, however. Godpromised Israel the miracle of genetic near-perfection: no miscarriagesof man or beast <strong>in</strong> Israel, just so long as the people were covenantallyfaithful to God (Ex. 23:25-26). They knew <strong>in</strong> advance whatwas possible, but they did not obey, and they did not receive thebless<strong>in</strong>g. Neither did their animals.<strong>This</strong> book deals with miracles. It also deals with run-of-the-millactivities that <strong>in</strong>volve the <strong>in</strong>evitable wear and tear oflife. In the <strong>Book</strong>of Exodus, we f<strong>in</strong>d a notable verse that supports the thesis of thisbook, Exodus 3:2: "And the angel of the LORD appeared unto him[Moses] <strong>in</strong> a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush: and he looked,and, behold, the bush burned with fire, and the bush was not consumed."Why wasn't it consumed? Because God susta<strong>in</strong>ed it. But itwas the oddness of a burn<strong>in</strong>g bush that was not be<strong>in</strong>g consumed thatcaught Moses' attention <strong>in</strong> the first place (Ex. 3:3). So the overcom<strong>in</strong>gof entropy had its part to play <strong>in</strong> God's plan for the ages.A similar comment applies to: 1) the manna of the wildernesswhich fed the Israelites for almost four decades; 2) the daily refill<strong>in</strong>gof the oil pot of the widow of Zarephath, who fed Elijah for overthree years; 3) the widow who poured oil out of a s<strong>in</strong>gle small potthat filled a roomful of large conta<strong>in</strong>ers; 4) Jesus' turn<strong>in</strong>g of water<strong>in</strong>to w<strong>in</strong>e; and 5) His feed<strong>in</strong>g of thousands with a few fish and loavesof bread. Most notably, it applies to every account of resurrectionfrom the dead, especially the resurrection ofJesus Christ.IfI were to come to you and <strong>in</strong>sist that as a Christian, you havean <strong>in</strong>tellectual responsibility to seek to identify the constant, universal,uniformitarian "natural law" that made any or all of these miraclespossible, you would regard me as a fool. These were miracles;therefore, the normal cause-and-effect relationships of conventionalphysical science did not govern them. 3 <strong>This</strong> biblically reasonableresponse is precisely what has long angered humanistic scientists.They deny biblical miracles.The idea that these miracles ever took place was rejected by alln<strong>in</strong>eteenth-century Darw<strong>in</strong>ian scientists. Very few scientists haveever affirmed faith <strong>in</strong> God's miracles, and never <strong>in</strong> their scientificpapers does the subject of miracles come up. Miracles were under-3. Sometimes I wonder if we make too much of a fuss try<strong>in</strong>g to f<strong>in</strong>d the "mechanisms"of the Genesis Flood, or how Noah could have fed the animals, or how hesqueezed them <strong>in</strong>to the ark.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!