13.07.2015 Views

Turkish Power Market Monthly Report (June 2012) - Hydropower ...

Turkish Power Market Monthly Report (June 2012) - Hydropower ...

Turkish Power Market Monthly Report (June 2012) - Hydropower ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. Analysis of <strong>Turkish</strong> DAM Activities in <strong>June</strong> <strong>2012</strong>The <strong>Turkish</strong> DAM is characterized by hourly and even weekly fluctuations in pricespikes and production volumes. However, in the aggregate, trading volumes andclearing prices continue to grow. In <strong>June</strong> <strong>2012</strong>, monthly electricity production increasedby 10% compared with the previous year. Based on HIPP’s previous studies, this reportuses three price clusters: peak, shoulder-peak and off-peak hours. During daytime,peak hours were categorized between 11:00-19:00 hours, whereas off-peak hours werebetween 02:00-08:00 and shoulder peak hours were 08:00-11:00 and 19:00-02:00.PMUM’s web site provides day-ahead demand and production forecasts. Data is alsoprovided on KGUP that is the final schedule of the next day’s production after dayaheadbidding 2 . HIPP uses KGUP as a proxy for demand on the <strong>Turkish</strong> power market.Table 5. Comparison of DAM variablesYearDAM Price(US c/kWh)TradingVolume onthe DAM(MWh)SystemDemandVolume(MWh)Variables onHourly Basis<strong>June</strong>, 2011 <strong>June</strong>, <strong>2012</strong> ChangeMax 11.54 11.10 -3.81%Average 5.96 7.94 33.22%Min 0.1 0.00 -100.00%Max 4,091 7,208 76.19%Average 1,318 5,082 285.58%Min 81 3,558 4292.59%Max 29,560 31,486 6.52%Average 23,290 24,765 6.33%Min 17,300 17,607 1.77%The data in Table 5 shows there were considerable y-o-y change in key marketvariables. Despite the stable electricity supply and prices in <strong>June</strong> <strong>2012</strong>, key marketvariables continued to show y-o-y increases. On average, SDV demand increased by6.33% in <strong>June</strong> <strong>2012</strong> while trading volumes and prices on the DAM tended to increaseas well. In the examined month, DAM’s trading volume almost tripled compared to <strong>June</strong>2011, while prices showed a 33.22% y-o-y increase on average.2 We estimated the difference between actual monthly production and KGUP monthly production at around 11% in <strong>June</strong>. (Total sumof KGUP production for <strong>June</strong> was 17,831 GWh, while for the same time period actual production was 19,858 GWh).6 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!