13.07.2015 Views

Download (724.2 KB) - Christchurch Art Gallery

Download (724.2 KB) - Christchurch Art Gallery

Download (724.2 KB) - Christchurch Art Gallery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Christchurch</strong> City Council Cultural Committee chairwoman Helen Garrett says if the currentsouthern extension proposal for the Robert McDougall <strong>Art</strong> <strong>Gallery</strong> is opposed they will keepon trying.Newspaper clipping from The Press “Extension into park opposed”, 9 July 1975.The Parks and Recreation Committee have opposed the extension of the <strong>Gallery</strong> south intothe Botanic Gardens because of the loss of rare trees. The Committee recommended theextension be north ward or upward.Minutes of <strong>Christchurch</strong> City Council Cultural Committee, 21 July 1975. Chairperson is HelenGarrett.Recommendations from Parks and Recreation Committee July meeting noted.Newspaper clipping from <strong>Christchurch</strong> Star “<strong>Gallery</strong> plans may yet be blocked”, 10 September1975.The Parks and Recreation and Cultural Committees of the <strong>Christchurch</strong> City Council gavetheir approval to a proposal to extend the Robert McDougall <strong>Art</strong> <strong>Gallery</strong> north into the BotanicGardens at a cost of $500,000. However this has met with disapproval by members of thepublic and has opposition within Council.Newspaper clipping from <strong>Christchurch</strong> Star “$500,000 gallery extension favoured”, 10September 1975.The Parks and Recreation and Cultural Committees of the <strong>Christchurch</strong> City Council gavetheir approval to a proposal to extend the Robert McDougall <strong>Art</strong> <strong>Gallery</strong> north into the BotanicGardens at a cost of $500,000. However this has met with disapproval by members of thepublic and has opposition within Council.Newspaper clipping from The Press “McDougall <strong>Art</strong> <strong>Gallery</strong> plan given approval”, 10September 1974.Outlines extension to the <strong>Gallery</strong> in more detail including diagrams showing the newextension plan to the north and the old extension plan toward the museum. A time frame oftwo years was discussed.Newspaper clipping from The Press “Argument for gallery extension”, 11 September 1975.<strong>Art</strong>icle by Rodney Wilson arguing for a sensitive extension into the Botanic Gardens ratherthan a new <strong>Gallery</strong>.Newspaper clipping from The Press “<strong>Gallery</strong> extension ‘foolish’”, 15 September 1975.Mr M.L. Cadogan of the Canterbury branch of the Friends of the Earth opposes the RobertMcDougall <strong>Art</strong> <strong>Gallery</strong> extension into the Botanic Gardens.Minutes of combined <strong>Christchurch</strong> City Council Parks and Recreation and CulturalCommittees, 15 September 1975Proposed Robert McDougall <strong>Art</strong> <strong>Gallery</strong> extensions were discussed with the extension to thenorth favoured.Newspaper clipping from <strong>Christchurch</strong> Star “<strong>Gallery</strong> work could start before library”, 16September 1975.As the Robert McDougall <strong>Art</strong> <strong>Gallery</strong> extension will be less expensive than the proposed newlibrary it may be built first. Both will be subject to a review of capital works by the Policy andFinance committee the following week.Newspaper clipping from <strong>Christchurch</strong> Star “<strong>Art</strong> gallery extension approved”, 16 September1975.Outlines opinions by individual councillors regarding the decision in favour of extending theRobert McDougall <strong>Art</strong> <strong>Gallery</strong> into the Botanic Gardens to the north.Newspaper clipping from The Press “Council decides to use gardens for gallery”, 16September 1975.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!