13.07.2015 Views

Neutrino masses in astroparticle physics - MPP Theory Group

Neutrino masses in astroparticle physics - MPP Theory Group

Neutrino masses in astroparticle physics - MPP Theory Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

702 G.G. Raffelt / New Astronomy Reviews 46 (2002) 699–708Fig. 1. Power spectrum of the galaxy distribution function measured by the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey. The solid l<strong>in</strong>e is the theoreticalprediction without neutr<strong>in</strong>o dark matter (Vn 50), the dashed l<strong>in</strong>e for Vn 50.01, and dot-dashed for Vn50.05. The other cosmological2parameters are V 50.3, V 50.7, h 5 0.70, and V h 5 0.02. [Figure from Elgaroy et al. (2002) with permission.]M L BSky Survey will have greater sensitivity to the a hot dark matter component can be related to eachoverall shape of PGal(k) on the relevant scales, other if the cosmic neutr<strong>in</strong>o density nnis known.allow<strong>in</strong>g one to disentangle more reliably the impact However, the cosmic neutr<strong>in</strong>o background cannot beof b and V on P (k). It is foreseen that one can measured with foreseeable methods so that onen Mreach a sensitivity of om | 0.65 eV (Hu et al., depends on <strong>in</strong>direct arguments for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g nn.n1998).Even if we accept that there are exactly three0For a degenerate neutr<strong>in</strong>o mass scenario the limit neutr<strong>in</strong>o flavors as <strong>in</strong>dicated by the Z decay widthof Eq. (4) corresponds to a limit on the overall mass and that they were once <strong>in</strong> thermal equilibrium doesscale of m , 0.8 eV, far more restrictive than the not fix nn. Each flavor is characterized by annlaboratory limit Eq. (2). However, the KATRIN unknown chemical potential mnor a degeneracyproject for improv<strong>in</strong>g the tritium endpo<strong>in</strong>t sensitivity parameter jn 5 mn/T, the latter be<strong>in</strong>g a quantityis foreseen to reach the 0.3 eV level (Osipowicz, <strong>in</strong>variant under cosmic expansion. While the ob-2001), similar to the anticipated sensitivity of future served baryon-to-photon ratio suggests that the decosmologicalobservations. If both methods yield a generacy parameters of all fermions are very small,positive signature, they will mutually re-enforce each for neutr<strong>in</strong>os this is an assumption and not another. If they both f<strong>in</strong>d upper limits, aga<strong>in</strong> they will established fact.be able to cross-check each other’s constra<strong>in</strong>ts.In the presence of a degeneracy parameter jnthenumber and energy densities of relativistic neutr<strong>in</strong>osplus anti-neutr<strong>in</strong>os <strong>in</strong> thermal equilibrium are3. How many neutr<strong>in</strong>os <strong>in</strong> the universe? 2 433z3 2ln(2) jnjn6nn 5 Tn]] 2 F1 1]]] 1]]1O(jn) G,The laboratory limits or future measurements of2p 3z3 72 z3mnand the cosmological limits or future discovery of (5)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!