706 G.G. Raffelt / New Astronomy Reviews 46 (2002) 699–708The neutr<strong>in</strong>o burst from a future galactic SN could to the sub-eV mass scale (Halzen and Jaczko, 1996;yield more restrictive limits because one would Choubey and K<strong>in</strong>g, 2002).expect up to 8000 events <strong>in</strong> a detector like Super-Kamiokande for a typical galactic distance of around10 kpc. With such a high-statistics signal the relevant 7. Discussion and summarytime-scale Dt is the fast rise-time of around 100 msrather than the overall burst duration of several The compell<strong>in</strong>g detection of flavor oscillations <strong>in</strong>seconds. Therefore, one is sensitive to smaller mass- the solar and atmospheric neutr<strong>in</strong>o data have trigesthan the SN 1987A burst, despite the shorter gered a new era <strong>in</strong> neutr<strong>in</strong>o <strong>physics</strong>. In the laboratorybasel<strong>in</strong>e. From detailed Monte-Carlo simulations one will proceed with precision experiments aimed atTotani (1998) <strong>in</strong>fers that Super-Kamiokande would measur<strong>in</strong>g the details of the mix<strong>in</strong>g matrix. Futurebe sensitive to about mn* 3 eV, almost <strong>in</strong>dependent- tritium decay experiments may well be able to probely of the exact distance. (At a larger distance one the overall neutr<strong>in</strong>o mass scale down to the 0.3 eVga<strong>in</strong>s basel<strong>in</strong>e but loses statistics, two effects that range, but if the absolute <strong>masses</strong> are smaller, it willcancel for a given detector size.)be very difficult to measure them, and the overallConceivably this sensitivity could be improved if a mass scale may rema<strong>in</strong> the most important unknowngravitational wave signal could be detected preced- quantity <strong>in</strong> neutr<strong>in</strong>o <strong>physics</strong> for a long time to come.<strong>in</strong>g the neutr<strong>in</strong>os, signify<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>stant of the stellar Unfortunately, it is unlikely that astrophysicalcollapse (Fargion, 1981; Arnaud et al., 2002). In this time-of-flight methods will help much. Foreseeablecase one may be sensitive to about 1 eV.SN neutr<strong>in</strong>o detectors are sensitive to eV <strong>masses</strong>, butIt is also conceivable that a SN collapses to a not the sub-eV range. On the bright side this meansblack hole some short time after the orig<strong>in</strong>al col- that the measured neutr<strong>in</strong>o light-curve of a futurelapse. In this case the neutr<strong>in</strong>o signal would abruptly galactic SN will faithfully represent the sourceterm<strong>in</strong>ate (with<strong>in</strong> Dt & 0.5 ms), thereby def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a without much modifications by neutr<strong>in</strong>o dispersion.very short time scale. Beacom et al. (2000, 2001) Cosmological large-scale structure data at presentfound that Super-Kamiokande would be sensitive to provide the most restrictive limit on neutr<strong>in</strong>o <strong>masses</strong>mn* 1.8 eV.of omn, 2.5 eV, correspond<strong>in</strong>g to mn, 0.8 eV <strong>in</strong> aIn the foreseeable future megatonne neutr<strong>in</strong>o degenerate mass scenario. A rigorous relationshipdetectors may be constructed to search for proton between the cosmic hot dark matter fraction Vnanddecay and to perform precision long-basel<strong>in</strong>e oscilla- mndepends on the cosmic neutr<strong>in</strong>o density nn. If thetion measurements with neutr<strong>in</strong>o beams. Such detec- solar LMA solution is correct, big-bang nutorswould have about 30 times the fiducial volume cleosynthesis constra<strong>in</strong>s nnwithout further assump-of Super-Kamiokande. The exact mnsensitivity for tions about the neutr<strong>in</strong>o chemical potentials. In thesuch an <strong>in</strong>strument has not been worked out. With a LMA case neutr<strong>in</strong>os reach de-facto flavor equilibmegatonnedetector one could measure SN neutr<strong>in</strong>os rium before the epoch of weak-<strong>in</strong>teraction freeze out.throughout the local group of galaxies. From An- While neutr<strong>in</strong>os do not play a dom<strong>in</strong>ant role fordromeda at a distance of 750 kpc one would get dark matter or structure formation, the mass andaround 50 events. Us<strong>in</strong>g the overall signal duration mix<strong>in</strong>g schemes suggested by the oscillation experiforDt yields a sensitivity <strong>in</strong> the few eV range. ments are nicely consistent with leptogenesisThe only conceivable time-of-flight technique that scenarios for creat<strong>in</strong>g the cosmic baryon asymmetry.could probe the sub-eV range <strong>in</strong>volves Gamma-Ray Therefore, massive neutr<strong>in</strong>os may be closely relatedBursts (GRBs) which have been speculated to be to the baryons <strong>in</strong> the universe, not the dark matter.strong neutr<strong>in</strong>o sources. If the neutr<strong>in</strong>o emission If extremely-high energy neutr<strong>in</strong>os will be obshowstime structure on the millisecond scale, and served <strong>in</strong> future, the Z-burst scenario provides aassum<strong>in</strong>g a cosmological distance of 1 Gpc, one handle on the cosmic background neutr<strong>in</strong>os and theirwould be sensitive to neutr<strong>in</strong>o <strong>masses</strong> m * 0.1 eV E/ mass through the observed cosmic rays near theGeV. Therefore, observ<strong>in</strong>g millisecond time structure GZK cutoff.<strong>in</strong> sub-GeV neutr<strong>in</strong>os from a GRB would be sensitive The great advance <strong>in</strong> our knowledge of neutr<strong>in</strong>o
G.G. Raffelt / New Astronomy Reviews 46 (2002) 699–708 707properties together with the cosmological precision baryon asymmetry. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 5047, [hep-ph/0007176].<strong>in</strong>formation has rendered the question of neutr<strong>in</strong>oChoubey, S., K<strong>in</strong>g, S.F. 2002. Gamma bursts as probes of neutr<strong>in</strong>o<strong>masses</strong> <strong>in</strong> astro<strong>physics</strong> and cosmology far more mass, quantum gravity and dark energy, hep-ph/0207260.subtle than it looked only a few years ago. We will Cowsik, R., McClelland, J., 1973. Gravity of neutr<strong>in</strong>os of nonzeronot know if the accumulation of new results would mass <strong>in</strong> astro<strong>physics</strong>. ApJ 180, 7.have persuaded Dennis Sciama that nature has used Dolgov, A.D., Hansen, S.H., Pastor, S., Petcov, S.T., Raffelt,G.G., Semikoz, D.V., 2002. Cosmological bounds on neutr<strong>in</strong>omassive neutr<strong>in</strong>os perhaps <strong>in</strong> different ways for degeneracy improved by flavor oscillations. Nucl. Phys. B 632,cosmology than he himself had imag<strong>in</strong>ed for so long. 363, [hep-ph/0201287].Either way, the connection between neutr<strong>in</strong>o prop- Doroshkevich, A.G., Zeldovich, Y.B., Syunyaev, R.A., Khlopov,erties and <strong>astroparticle</strong> <strong>physics</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>s of fundamen- M.Y., 1980. PAZh 6, 457, [SvAL 6, 252].Eitel, K. Compatibility analysis of the LSND evidence and thetal <strong>in</strong>terest.KARMEN exclusion for anti-nu/mu → anti-nu/e oscillations,New J. Phys. 2, 1 [hep-ex/9909036].Elgaroy, O. et al., 2002. A new limit on the total neutr<strong>in</strong>o massfrom the 2dF galaxy redshift survey, astro-ph/0204152Acknowledgements [PhRvL89, 061301].Fargion, D., 1981. Time delay between gravitational waves andThis work was supported, <strong>in</strong> part, by the Deutsche neutr<strong>in</strong>o burst from a supernova explosion: A test for theneutr<strong>in</strong>o mass. Lett. Nuovo Cim. 31, 499, [hep-ph/0110061].Forschungsgeme<strong>in</strong>schaft under grant No. SFB-375 Fargion, D., Mele, B., Salis, A., 1999. Ultrahigh energy neutr<strong>in</strong>oand by the European Science Foundation (ESF) scatter<strong>in</strong>g onto relic light neutr<strong>in</strong>os <strong>in</strong> galactic halo as aunder the Network Grant No. 86 <strong>Neutr<strong>in</strong>o</strong> Astro- possible source of highest energy extragalactic cosmic rays.<strong>physics</strong>.ApJ 517, 725, [astro-ph/9710029].Fodor, Z., Katz, S.D., R<strong>in</strong>gwald, A., 2002. Relic neutr<strong>in</strong>o <strong>masses</strong>and the highest energy cosmic rays, hep-ph/0203198[JHEP0206, 046].Fukuda, S. et al., 2000. Tau neutr<strong>in</strong>os favored over sterileReferencesneutr<strong>in</strong>os <strong>in</strong> atmospheric muon neutr<strong>in</strong>o oscillations. PhRvL85, 3999, [hep-ex/0009001].Abazajian, K.N., Beacom, J.F., Bell, N.F. Str<strong>in</strong>gent constra<strong>in</strong>ts on Fukugita, M., Yanagida, T., 1986. Baryogenesis without grandcosmological neutr<strong>in</strong>o ant<strong>in</strong>eutr<strong>in</strong>o asymmetries from unification. Phys. Lett. B 174, 45.synchronized flavor transformation, astro-ph/0203442 Gershte<strong>in</strong>, S.S., Zeldovich, Y.B., 1966. Rest mass of muonic[PhRvD66, 013008]. neutr<strong>in</strong>o and cosmology. Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 4, 174,Adams, J.A., Sarkar, S., Sciama, D.W., 1998. CMB anisotropy <strong>in</strong> [JETP Lett. 4, 120].the decay<strong>in</strong>g neutr<strong>in</strong>o cosmology. MNRAS 301, 210, [astro- Halzen, F., Jaczko, G., 1996. Signatures of gamma ray bursts <strong>in</strong>ph/9805108]. neutr<strong>in</strong>o telescopes. Phys. Rev. D 54, 2779.Ahmad, Q.R. et al. (SNO Collaboration). Measurement of day and Hannestad, S., 2001. New CMBR data and the cosmic neutr<strong>in</strong>onight neutr<strong>in</strong>o energy spectra at SNO and constra<strong>in</strong>ts on background. PhRvD 64, 083002, [astro-ph/0105220].neutr<strong>in</strong>o mix<strong>in</strong>g parameters, nucl-ex/0204009 [PhRvL89, Hannestad, S., 2002. Cosmological limit on the neutr<strong>in</strong>o mass,011302]. astro-ph/0205223.Ahmad, Q.R. et al. (SNO Collaboration). Direct evidence for Hansen, S.H., Mangano, G., Melchiorri, A., Miele, G., Pisanti, O.,neutr<strong>in</strong>o flavor transformation from neutral-current <strong>in</strong>teractions 2002. Constra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g neutr<strong>in</strong>o <strong>physics</strong> with BBN and CMBR.<strong>in</strong> the Sudbury <strong>Neutr<strong>in</strong>o</strong> Observatory, nucl-ex/0204008 PhRvD 65, 023511, [astro-ph/0105385].[PhRvL89, 011301].Hu, W., Eisenste<strong>in</strong>, D.J., Tegmark, M., 1998. Weigh<strong>in</strong>g neutr<strong>in</strong>osArnaud, N. et al., 2002. Gravity wave and neutr<strong>in</strong>o bursts from with galaxy surveys. PhRvL 80, 5255, [astro-ph/9712057].stellar collapse: A sensitive test of neutr<strong>in</strong>o <strong>masses</strong>. PhRvD 65, Kalashev, O.E., Kuzm<strong>in</strong>, V.A., Semikoz, D.V., Sigl, G., 2002.033010, [hep-ph/0109027]. Ultra-high energy cosmic rays from neutr<strong>in</strong>o emitt<strong>in</strong>g accelera-Beacom, J.F., Boyd, R.N., Mezzacappa, A., 2000. Technique for tion sources? PhRvD 65, 103003, [hep-ph/0112351].direct eV-scale measurements of the mu and tau neutr<strong>in</strong>o Kang, H.S., Steigman, G., 1992. Cosmological constra<strong>in</strong>ts on<strong>masses</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g supernova neutr<strong>in</strong>os. PhRvL 85, 3568, [hep-ph/ neutr<strong>in</strong>o degeneracy. Nucl. Phys. B 372, 494.0006015]. Kneller, J.P., Scherrer, R.J., Steigman, G., Walker, T.P., 2001.Beacom, J.F., Boyd, R.N., Mezzacappa, A., 2001. Black hole How does the cosmic microwave background plus big bangformation <strong>in</strong> core collapse supernovae and time-of-flight mea- nucleosynthesis constra<strong>in</strong> new <strong>physics</strong>? PhRvD 64, 123506,surements of the neutr<strong>in</strong>o <strong>masses</strong>. PhRvD 63, 073011, [astro- [astro-ph/0101386].ph/0010398].Lobashev,V.M. et al., 1999. Direct search for mass of neutr<strong>in</strong>o andBuchmuller, ¨ W., Plumacher, ¨ M., 2000. <strong>Neutr<strong>in</strong>o</strong> <strong>masses</strong> and the anomaly <strong>in</strong> the tritium beta-spectrum. Phys. Lett. B 460, 227.