eturned and subdued them. Mitchell suffered a sprained ankle.Officer Brent Lewandowski testified that he was stationed in theemergency room when an inmate who was being treated attacked adoctor. After officers had subdued that inmate, Lewandowski heard“a commotion” coming from the staging area, and he went in to findMitchell “defending blows” from two inmates in front of him.Lewandowski testified that he saw defendant standing behindMitchell and striking him in the head.Victim Impact StatementsJanet Mena’s sister Gabriela Mena gave a victim impactstatement, as did Mena’s father and her mother. The court also heardimpact statements by Kenneth Lozada, Juan Estrada’s brother.Estrada’s wife, Kimberle, who was 5½ months pregnant at the timeof the murders, also submitted a statement.Evidence in MitigationDefendant’s ChildhoodDefendant called his cousin, Tanya Potts, as a witness inmitigation. Potts testified that defendant lived with his mother, Lola,and siblings in a house near Potts in Grand Rapids, Michigan in 1983.In August 1983, Potts learned that defendant’s family had beenkidnapped by defendant’s stepfather, Victor “Tutti” Pasarro, and thefront door and front windows of the house had been broken in. Twoor three weeks later, Potts and her father took defendant and hisfamily to a women’s shelter. Later, after defendant and his familymoved back into their home in Grand Rapids, Pasarro moved in withthem, and Potts was not allowed to visit the home anymore.Approximately 10 years later, defendant’s older sister Antoinettecame to Potts’ home and told Potts she had run away. She only stayeda few hours, however. Three or four months later, the father of Potts’children found defendant out walking in Grand Rapids and broughthim to Potts’ house. Defendant was dirty and tired, and he told Pottshe could not go back home with his mother and Pasarro anymore.Defendant stayed with Potts and her family for two or three months,but he then left, telling her that he felt guilty that he could notcontribute financially to the household.-22-
Defendant’s younger brother, Genarro Rosas, also testified.Genarro said that his first memory of Pasarro was when Genarro wasapproximately three years old, when they lived in Chicago. Accordingto Genarro, his mother and Pasarro were fighting, and Genarro,Antoinette, and defendant were standing outside in the snow. Genarrorecalled that he was in a diaper, and that Antoinette and defendantwere in pajamas, and that Pasarro’s sister had to come and take thechildren to their grandparents’ house. Genarro also recalled anoccasion where Pasarro and Delores were fighting and Pasarrothreatened to kill Delores and Antoinette. It was after this fight thatdefendant, Antoinette, Genarro, and Delores moved to Grand Rapids.Genarro then recounted the August 1993 kidnapping incident thatPotts had described. According to Genarro, he and defendant hadawoken in the night when they heard someone trying to break in.They heard a loud bang as the front door was broken in, and then theylooked into the living room and saw Pasarro “throwing” their motheraround. Genarro stated that Pasarro grabbed Delores by the hair andneck and forced her out to the car, where the children followed.Pasarro then instructed the children to get into the car, and he drovethe family to an apartment in Chicago. According to Genarro, peoplein the apartment were “shooting cocaine or heroin, smoking crack orwhatever, smoking weed, getting their high on.” Genarro testified thathe and his family spent two days in the back room of the apartmentwith no food or bathroom, until Pasarro’s father discovered them andtook the family to Delores’s parents, who returned them to GrandRapids.Approximately eight months after they returned to Grand Rapids,Delores allowed Pasarro to move in. According to Genarro, Pasarrowas abusive toward Delores “daily,” and defendant, who was sevenor eight, often tried to get between Pasarro and Delores. Genarro alsotestified that he and defendant were forced to kneel on bottle caps for15 or 20 minutes at a time as discipline, and that Pasarro hit themwith shoes and extension cords. Genarro also testified that Pasarroand Delores were still together, and that Delores was covered inbruises from years of abuse.Genarro told the court that Pasarro did odd jobs for money, butthat he also sold drugs. According to Genarro, Pasarro took Deloresand her children with him to buy drugs from Pasarro’s father, and-23-
- Page 1 and 2: Docket No. 98911.IN THESUPREME COUR
- Page 3 and 4: strangulation. On Mena’s body, Co
- Page 5 and 6: when she turned her back defendant
- Page 7 and 8: The court indicated that defendant
- Page 9 and 10: then occurred:“THE COURT: All rig
- Page 11 and 12: If this were a case that were near
- Page 13 and 14: to talk to the lawyer. Actually the
- Page 15 and 16: * * *Let me-just from reading the f
- Page 17 and 18: he has, sit down with you one more
- Page 19 and 20: to get it resolved,” and defendan
- Page 21: eaking and entering, six counts of
- Page 25 and 26: DeSloover also presented a “psych
- Page 27 and 28: to return him to his mother’s hou
- Page 29 and 30: that, as an axis II diagnosis, 4 th
- Page 31 and 32: others,” indicated by at least th
- Page 33 and 34: of defendant’s juvenile records s
- Page 35 and 36: Defendant also called Ruben Granvil
- Page 37 and 38: certainly don’t believe he was br
- Page 39 and 40: appropriate sentence.”Defendant
- Page 41 and 42: irrelevant, because its theory was
- Page 43 and 44: motion for appointment that he plan
- Page 45 and 46: person. When Granich later told the
- Page 47 and 48: Mr. Baez on that date, on prior dat
- Page 49 and 50: ANALYSISI. Right to CounselDefendan
- Page 51 and 52: and attorney Theis. After the court
- Page 53 and 54: private counsel and that it could n
- Page 55 and 56: egarding Granich’s experience gen
- Page 57 and 58: We can do-would you do this for me?
- Page 59 and 60: experience, and conduct of the accu
- Page 61 and 62: 1989), but that case is distinguish
- Page 63 and 64: firsthand the credibility and belie
- Page 65 and 66: Defendant’s second expert witness
- Page 67 and 68: defendant was not under the influen
- Page 69 and 70: did apply the “death is the appro
- Page 71 and 72: second phase of a death penalty hea
- Page 73 and 74:
defendant participated in an aggrav
- Page 75 and 76:
childhood and early introduction to