13.07.2015 Views

individual communication to the united nations ... - Community Law

individual communication to the united nations ... - Community Law

individual communication to the united nations ... - Community Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11Jan 00-Mr and Ms Gandy living in Seaspray:Oct 01- possessions dumped on footpath outside Seaspray house 4707/05/01 Police Investigation Report by Inspec<strong>to</strong>r Dorian 48Oct 2001Mr and Ms Gandy move <strong>to</strong> Melbourne:- Ms Gandy felt emotionally and personally unsafe living inSeaspray approximately 10 kilometres from Mr Barker andhis friends 4930/05/03 Ms Gandy files applications for assistance with VOCAT for herselfand her children:- Criminal offence alleged is „aggravated armed robbery‟ 5010/12/04 VOCAT directions hearing before Member Hassard:- Hearing should not proceed as intended- Date set for fur<strong>the</strong>r directions hearing <strong>to</strong> determine whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>applications should be refused forthwith 5126/04/05 VOCAT directions hearing before Member Hassard:- Ms Gandy‟s application refused and children‟s applicationsmarked as withdrawn 5218/10/05 VCAT appeal heard before Vice-President Judge Davis 5313/01/06 Judgment from Judge Davis:- VOCAT decision in relation <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> children‟s applicationsaffirmed- In relation <strong>to</strong> Ms Gandy‟s application, finding that an act ofviolence occurred, constituted by a threat of injury- Award made for counselling of up <strong>to</strong> 50 sessions and medicalexpenses (hearing aids) <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> value of $7600 54Background <strong>to</strong> appeal:- The applicants were seeking a review of <strong>the</strong> decision of <strong>the</strong>Victims of Crime Assistance Tribunal (VOCAT) on 26 April2005 refusing <strong>to</strong> make awards of assistance <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m under <strong>the</strong>Victims of Crime Assistance Act 1996 as victims of an act ofviolence which <strong>the</strong>y alleged occurred on 9 January 2000. MsAshling Gandy is <strong>the</strong> only adult applicant. She is <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r ofDylan and Hannah, and <strong>the</strong> aunt of Ma<strong>the</strong>w Brennan 5502/11/06 VOCAT variation hearing before Member Sergeant:- Application <strong>to</strong> vary award refused 5601/12/06 Hearing before Bongiorno J in <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court of Vic<strong>to</strong>ria:- Application by defendant <strong>to</strong> strike out Ms Gandy‟s statement of47 See attachment marked “II” at paragraph 2.40.48 See attachment marked “DD”.49 See attachment marked “II” at paragraph 2.45.50 See attachment marked “AA”.51 See attachment marked “AA”.52 See attachment marked “AA”.53 See attachment marked “Y”.54 See attachment marked “U”.55 See attachment marked “Y”.56 See attachment marked “Y”.Ashling Gandy v Australia, Individual Communication <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Human Rights Committee

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!