13.07.2015 Views

individual communication to the united nations ... - Community Law

individual communication to the united nations ... - Community Law

individual communication to the united nations ... - Community Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

182. Everyone has <strong>the</strong> right <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> protection of <strong>the</strong> law against suchinterference or attacks.There are two aspects <strong>to</strong> Article 17. The first aspect refers <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> prohibition onarbitrary and unlawful interferences with <strong>the</strong> right <strong>to</strong> privacy. The second refers <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong> right <strong>to</strong> protection of <strong>the</strong> law against interference. These two aspects will becovered in Part 1 and Part 2 in <strong>the</strong> discussion of this right.Part 1 – Arbitrary or Unlawful InterferenceIn General Comment No.16 (08/04/88) regarding Article 17, <strong>the</strong> UN Human RightsCommittee notes at paragraphs 3 and 4:“The term “unlawful” means that no interference can take place exceptin cases envisaged by <strong>the</strong> law. Interference authorized by States canonly take place on <strong>the</strong> basis of law, which itself must comply with <strong>the</strong>provisions, aims and objectives of <strong>the</strong> Covenant.“The expression “arbitrary interference” is also relevant <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>protection of <strong>the</strong> right provided for in article 17. In <strong>the</strong> Committee’s view<strong>the</strong> expression “arbitrary interference” can also extend <strong>to</strong> interferenceprovided for under <strong>the</strong> law. The introduction of <strong>the</strong> concept ofarbitrariness is intend <strong>to</strong> guarantee that even interference provided forby law should be in accordance with <strong>the</strong> provisions, aims andobjectives of <strong>the</strong> Covenant and should be, in any event, reasonable in<strong>the</strong> particular circumstances.”As described above, <strong>the</strong> Author received pro bono advice from counsel as <strong>to</strong> potentialclaims against Mr Barker. As part of <strong>the</strong> memorandum of advice, counsel considered<strong>the</strong> lawfulness of <strong>the</strong> eviction by Mr Barker. The relevant sections are extractedbelow:22. Based on <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>the</strong> Gandys can establish that <strong>the</strong>rewas a lease in <strong>the</strong> terms set out above, it is my opinion that Mr Barkeracted unlawfully in purporting <strong>to</strong> terminate <strong>the</strong> lease, and in evicting <strong>the</strong>Gandys from <strong>the</strong> premises.23. First, I consider that <strong>the</strong> delivery of <strong>the</strong> notice <strong>to</strong> vacate did notconstitute a valid termination of <strong>the</strong> tenancy. Assuming for <strong>the</strong> presentpurposes that <strong>the</strong> lease was a tenancy agreement for <strong>the</strong> use ofpremises <strong>to</strong> be primarily used for residential purposes, such as <strong>to</strong> bring<strong>the</strong> tenancy agreement within <strong>the</strong> ambit of <strong>the</strong> Residential TenanciesAct 1997 (“<strong>the</strong> Act”), <strong>the</strong> notice <strong>to</strong> vacate delivered by Mr Barker doesnot conform with <strong>the</strong> requirements for such notices set out in sections255 – 259 and 263 of that Act. Those sections specify a number ofcircumstances in which a landlord of rental premises may deliver anotice <strong>to</strong> vacate. They specify <strong>the</strong> requirements (includingAshling Gandy v Australia, Individual Communication <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Human Rights Committee

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!