13.07.2015 Views

Deformations of a highway embankment on degraded permafrost

Deformations of a highway embankment on degraded permafrost

Deformations of a highway embankment on degraded permafrost

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

involved two cross-secti<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> which was designatedas ‘stable’ and the other as ‘unstable’. The stable secti<strong>on</strong>is <strong>on</strong>ly about 2m high (Figure 2a) and has not deformedsignificantly. The unstable secti<strong>on</strong> is also about 2m highabove the surrounding natural ground. It has settledc<strong>on</strong>siderably and now c<strong>on</strong>tains about 5m - 6m <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> gravel(Figure 2b). The gravel is partly from the originalc<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> and partly from <strong>on</strong>going re-grading. The‘zero’ depth in Figure 2 and in subsequent figures isreferenced to the level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the original ground surface and<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the surrounding undisturbed land.near the toe. At the mid-slope, the soil is primarily silt toclayey silt. The toe <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the unstable secti<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sists <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>1.0m <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> clayey peat-silt, 1.0m <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fine gravel, followed by alayer <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> highly plastic clay. This clay is firm, brown, siltyclay at upper levels and becomes very s<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>t and grey to adepth approaching 18m. The mid-slope <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the unstablesecti<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sists <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> almost 2.0m <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> clayey peat-silt, over2.0m <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> loose fine gravel, followed by firm brown silty claythat transiti<strong>on</strong>s to grey and s<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>t clay. Both secti<strong>on</strong>s areunderlain by gneissic bedrock. The surrounding area ispoorly drained - there is free-standing water withinapproximately 20m <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <str<strong>on</strong>g>embankment</str<strong>on</strong>g> toe when snow isnot present.2.2 Instrumentati<strong>on</strong>Clusters <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> instruments were installed at the shoulder,mid-slope and toe <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> both the stable and unstable secti<strong>on</strong>s(Figure 3). They include thermistor strings at 1m intervals,vibrating wire piezometers and standpipes, surfacesettlement plates, slope inclinometers, and lateraldisplacement extensometers at the toe <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<str<strong>on</strong>g>embankment</str<strong>on</strong>g>. The piezometers and standpipes wereused to identify possible upwards or downwards hydraulicgradients.Temperatures have been collected during two wintercycles. Readings were taken m<strong>on</strong>thly <strong>on</strong> a dataacquisiti<strong>on</strong> system and downloaded manually. Teleph<strong>on</strong>eaccess was not available at reas<strong>on</strong>able cost at therelatively remote site.3 DATA FROM FIELD INSTRUMENTATIONFollowing secti<strong>on</strong>s analyse the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the fieldobservati<strong>on</strong>s. The data include surveyed results from thesurface settlement plates, displacements measured byinclinometers and horiz<strong>on</strong>tal extensometers, pore waterpressures, and m<strong>on</strong>thly temperatures from the thermistorstrings. Inserts in following figures show the positi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>the instruments for which results are being reported.3.1 Movements measured by surface settlement platesFigure 2. a) stable secti<strong>on</strong>; b) unstable secti<strong>on</strong>The terms stable and unstable are here used in thesense <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a serviceability limit state and not an ultimatelimit state. There are no indicati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> deep-seatedrotati<strong>on</strong>al movements.Boreholes were drilled at the mid-slope and toe <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>each secti<strong>on</strong> to examine the stratigraphy, collect samplesfor laboratory testing, and install instruments to record thebehaviour <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the foundati<strong>on</strong> soils over several years.Batenipour et al. (2009a, b and 2010) provided additi<strong>on</strong>alinformati<strong>on</strong> about site characterizati<strong>on</strong>, instrumentati<strong>on</strong>and material properties. This paper provides informati<strong>on</strong><strong>on</strong> two full years <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> field measurements.Figure 2 shows that soil c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s below the originalground level (at depth ‘0’ in the figure) at the two secti<strong>on</strong>sare c<strong>on</strong>siderably different. The stable secti<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sists <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>approximately 4.0m <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> s<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>t-to-firm clayey silt/silty clay withpeat intrusi<strong>on</strong>s that vary from thin stratificati<strong>on</strong>s to pocketsFigures 4 and 5 show displacements <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> surface settlementplates in metres in both the stable and unstable secti<strong>on</strong>sat the shoulder <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the road, at mid-slope, and at the toe <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>the <str<strong>on</strong>g>embankment</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. Vertical movements are shown aselevati<strong>on</strong> changes in Figure 4, and horiz<strong>on</strong>tal (lateral)movements perpendicular to the centreline <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the road inFigure 5.Figures 4a, 4b, and 4c show the vertical movements atthe shoulder, mid-slope and toe <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the two secti<strong>on</strong>s. Bothshow seas<strong>on</strong>al movements that are largely, but notcompletely recoverable. Because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the gravel in the<str<strong>on</strong>g>embankment</str<strong>on</strong>g>, the seas<strong>on</strong>al movements at the shoulderare small. There appears to be little cumulativemovement at the shoulder <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the stable secti<strong>on</strong>. Inc<strong>on</strong>trast, there has been about 0.15m <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> settlement at theshoulder <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the unstable secti<strong>on</strong>. Seas<strong>on</strong>al heaves arelarger at mid-slope, and larger again at the toe. Again thestable secti<strong>on</strong> shows little cumulative movement, while

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!