19THCENTURYMUSICb. (continued)16 ♭♭ ♮♮♮♮♯♯♯♯♭♭♮♮ 19↓♯ ♯ ♯ 22 24 () ♭ ♭ ♭ ♭ ♭ ♭ ♭ ♮ ♮ ↓♭ ♭ ♯ ♯ ♯ ♯ ♭ ♭ ↓ ♯♯♮↓♯ ↓ ♮ ↓ ↓ ♭ ↓ ♭ ↓ ♯♮ ♮ ♭ ♭♯♯ ♯ ♯ ♯ ♮ ♮ ♭ ♭ ♯ ♮ ♮ ♭♭ ♭♭ ♭ ♭ ♭ ♭ ♭ ♭ ♭ ♭♭ ♭ ♭ ♭ ♭ ♭♭ ♮ ♭ ♭ con strepito♮ ♭ ♭ ♯ ♮ ♭ ♯♯ FG♭ ♭ ♭♭ ♭♭ ♭ ♭ ♭♭ ↑♭♭ ♯ ♯♯♯↑♯ ♯♯ ↓ ♭♭ ♯♯♯♯♭ ♭ ♭♭ ♭♭̇̇ ̇̇♭ ̇̇ ̇̇♭ ♭♭ ♯♯ ♭ ♯ ♮♮ ♯♯ ♯ ♯ ♯♯ ♭ ♭ Example 5 (continued)viewed as an increasingly elaborate improvisationin its patterned chordal <strong>and</strong> octave texturesbetween A <strong>and</strong> C, its reliance on repetition,<strong>and</strong> its recourse to “<strong>de</strong>fault” chromatic ordiminished octaves before moments of harmonicarrival (mm. 5, 8, 12, 15–17, 25). Becausethe relationship between composition-as-improvisation<strong>and</strong> improvisation-as-compositionremains fluid in the “Dante” Sonata, it wouldseem wrong-hea<strong>de</strong>d to i<strong>de</strong>ntify any precise pointat which improvisation “becomes” composition.The in<strong>de</strong>terminacy is wholly in keepingwith <strong>Liszt</strong>’s conception as projected in his finaltitle.Much of <strong>Liszt</strong>’s virtuosity resi<strong>de</strong>s in a worldof exp<strong>and</strong>ing keyboard idioms that have traditionallybelonged to the execution of preexistingmaterial rather than to the thematic-har-monic substance of composition. This i<strong>de</strong>alistdivision becomes increasingly difficult to maintainin the “Dante” Sonata, in part due to thework’s complex genesis. To conceive <strong>Liszt</strong>’spatterning of figures as the scripting of physical,visually virtuosic gestures is to draw attentionto him as the performing agent in contrastto the customary invisibility of a work’s creator.90 The two reports that document <strong>Liszt</strong>90In neat summary of the work-condition un<strong>de</strong>r scrutinyhere, Lydia Goehr writes that composers “should be neitherseen nor heard, to un<strong>de</strong>rscore the mystery both ofabsence <strong>and</strong> of genius.” Continuing this mo<strong>de</strong>l, the statusesof performers <strong>and</strong> audience are to be complementary:“Performers <strong>and</strong> their instruments should be heardbut not seen, but ‘heard’ only as imperfect pointers towardsthe transcen<strong>de</strong>nt. And audiences, to complete thetriad, should be seen but not heard, but ‘seen’ only in the84
sense that each listener being present to grasp the work inthe privacy of his or her own contemplative experience”(Lydia Goehr, The Quest for Voice: Music, Politics, <strong>and</strong>the Limits of Philosophy [Oxford: Oxford University Press,1998], p. 144).91The occasion on which <strong>Liszt</strong> allegedly disguised his playingas Chopin’s was first recor<strong>de</strong>d publicly by CharlesRollinet in Le Temps (1 Sept. 1874), thirty years after thefact. Rollinet’s account was disputed in 1888 by FriedrichNiecks, who reports that the aging <strong>Liszt</strong> <strong>de</strong>clared he hadno recollection of this occasion. Further <strong>de</strong>tails of the disputeare given by Rena Mueller in “The Ramann-<strong>Liszt</strong>Questionnaires,” Franz <strong>Liszt</strong> <strong>and</strong> His World, p. 420, n. 1.In 1837 Berlioz <strong>de</strong>scribes <strong>Liszt</strong>’s invisible performance ofBeethoven’s “Moonlight” Sonata in audiovisual terms: “Itwas the sha<strong>de</strong> of Beethoven himself, his great voice thatwe heard, called forth by the virtuoso” (Journal <strong>de</strong>s Débats,12 March 1837). This anecdote is discussed in relation tothe sonata’s aesthetics of mystery in Lawrence Kramer,“H<strong>and</strong>s On, Lights Off,” from Musical Meaning: Toward aCritical History, p. 37; <strong>and</strong> in relation to Berlioz’s ownaesthetics in Katherine Kolb Reeve, “Primal Scenes:Smithson, Pleyel, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Liszt</strong> in the Eyes of Berlioz,” thisjournal 18 (1995), 228–29.92“Aber man muß das hören und auch sehen, <strong>Liszt</strong> dürftedurchaus nicht hinter <strong>de</strong>n Kulissen spielen; ein großesStück Poesie ginge dadurch verloren” (Neue Zeitschriftfür Musik 12 [1840], 102–03).93The difficult status of such keyboard figures predates<strong>Liszt</strong>’s dédoublement, extending arguably to early-nineteenth-centurypianists including J. N. Hummel, whosekeyboard manuscript for the Concerto in C, op. 34a, forexample, still retained a figured-bass shorth<strong>and</strong> ready forrealization in the moment, leading Joel Sachs to argue thatHummel “conceived of music as the <strong>de</strong>coration of harmonicprogressions” (Joel Sachs, “Johann NepomukHummel,” Grove Music Online, ed. L. Macy, accessed 4J<strong>une</strong> 2007, http://www.grovemusic.com).disappearing entirely behind the musical i<strong>de</strong>ntityof other composers—Chopin, Beethoven—emphasize that he began playing only after extinguishingall c<strong>and</strong>les <strong>and</strong> lamps <strong>and</strong> loweringthe curtains; in total darkness, his auralprosopopoeia reportedly <strong>de</strong>ceived listeners(there were no viewers) to the extent that “itwas impossible not to mistake him [for Chopin];<strong>and</strong> in<strong>de</strong>ed, everyone was mistaken.” 91 (Schumannfamously reinforced the point when herecor<strong>de</strong>d <strong>Liszt</strong>’s own ocular <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>ncies in1840: “[if <strong>Liszt</strong>] played behind a screen, a great<strong>de</strong>al of poetry would be lost.” 92 )Hyperbole asi<strong>de</strong>, the visual contingency of<strong>Liszt</strong>’s i<strong>de</strong>ntity would seem to suspend the gesturesassociated with his idiomatic figures in alimbo between professional i<strong>de</strong>ntities: the gesturesdraw the “listening gaze,” yet as inseparablefrom the figures they also contribute tothe thematic substance of a work. 93 <strong>Liszt</strong>’s revisionsillustrate the extent to which his presentationof thematic material <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>d onmodular, idiomatic figures. His use of revised<strong>and</strong> reinvented figurations suggests that he wascontinually reworking <strong>and</strong> improvising on different“i<strong>de</strong>al sound images” at the keyboard,resulting in several actualizations, multiple“versions.” Features consi<strong>de</strong>red substantive(structural rather than ornamental) by mainstreamanalysis—harmonic motion, voice-leading,contrapuntal framework, registral disposition—remainunchanged in such revisions, buttheir realization tends to favor the performer’sprerogative to adopt <strong>and</strong> adapt textures to suitthe “momentary mood,” as Czerny put it, or tofollow “feeling <strong>and</strong> invention,” as <strong>Liszt</strong> remarked,in <strong>de</strong>termining “what the i<strong>de</strong>as are,<strong>and</strong> how they are carried out <strong>and</strong> worked up.” 94Because idiomatic figures are by nature irreducibleas patterning components, they operateas basic formal units that can be repeated toform larger paragraphs, which themselves canbe sequentially repeated. 95 In <strong>Liszt</strong>’s case, theinvention <strong>and</strong> constant morphing of figurationsare gui<strong>de</strong>d by a highly <strong>de</strong>veloped intuition forsound images that Rosen calls “the greatest ofany keyboard composer’s between Scarlatti <strong>and</strong>Debussy.” 96 This view can be measured againstthe figural reworking of the F ♯ -major theme(shown in ex. 6), in which <strong>Liszt</strong> revises thetheme’s realization three times with differentfiguration. Although the figural patterns remainrooted in mechanical piano methods, they areemployed in this context to alter the lyricalcharacter of the theme. In a weakening field ofopposition between performer <strong>and</strong> composer,the figures that realize <strong>Liszt</strong>’s theme increas-94<strong>Liszt</strong> to Louis Köhler, 9 July 1856, in Letters of Franz<strong>Liszt</strong>, trans. C. Bache (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons,1894), I, 274.95See the <strong>de</strong>tailed study of <strong>Liszt</strong>’s figures <strong>and</strong> figurations inJim Samson’s <strong>Virtuosity</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Musical Work. For a studyof figurations at both foreground <strong>and</strong> middleground levels,see Thomas Hitzberger, “Zwischen Tonalität undRationalität: Anmerkungen zur Sequenz- und Figurationstechnik<strong>Liszt</strong>s,” in Virtuosität und Avantgar<strong>de</strong>: Untersuchungenzum Klavierwerk Franz <strong>Liszt</strong> (Mainz: Schott,1988), pp. 32–59; <strong>and</strong> Wilhelm Sei<strong>de</strong>l “Über Figurationsmotivevon Chopin und <strong>Liszt</strong>,” in Report on the InternationalMusicological Society Congress 1972, ed. HenrikGlahn (Copenhagen: Hansen, 1974), pp. 647–51.96Charles Rosen, The Romantic Generation, p. 508.DAVIDTRIPPETT<strong>Virtuosity</strong> inthe “Dante”Sonata85