Phthalates and Nonylphenols in Roskilde Fjord
Phthalates and Nonylphenols in Roskilde Fjord
Phthalates and Nonylphenols in Roskilde Fjord
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
76r = 0.80 (p=0.03)5BBP ng/l St.6043210-10 1 2 3 4BBP ng/l St.2Figure 16Station 60 versus Station 2 for BBP. Significant correlation.As can be seen from Figure 16, a good l<strong>in</strong>ear relationship exists for BBPbetween the two locations. It is somewhat surpris<strong>in</strong>g that this is found forBBP, <strong>and</strong> not for the much more abundant substances DBP <strong>and</strong> DEHP.There is no obvious environmental explanation for this observation.5.2 <strong>Fjord</strong> sediment5.2.1 Abundance of substancesIn the sediment much higher concentrations were found than <strong>in</strong> the water.In Table 16, the results for the sediment are shown as mean <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>arddeviation for the <strong>Roskilde</strong> Vig near the WWTP outlet, <strong>and</strong> averagefor the positions further away Station 2, Station 2044 <strong>and</strong> Station 60.Furthermore, the results for the two stations <strong>in</strong> the Isefjord are shown forcomparison. “d” is the mean distance from the WWTP outlet <strong>in</strong> meters.39
Change language