Phthalates and Nonylphenols in Roskilde Fjord

More documents

Recommendations

Info

9 AbbreviationsAnalyteBBPDD 4 -BBPD 4 -DBPD 4 -DEHPD 4 -DnOPDBPDEHPDnNPDnOPDPPdm %dmGCGC/MSHRMSLDmg/kg dwµg/kg dwMSndnon-detectDEPANERISubstance analysedButylbenzylphthalateDeuterium ( 2 H, heavy isotope of hydrogen)BBP deuterium-labelled in ringDBP deuterium-labelled in ringDEHP deuterium-labelled in ringDnOP deuterium-labelled in ringDi(n-butyl)phthalateDi(2-ethylhexyl)phthalateDi(n-nonyl)phthalateDi(n-octyl)phthalateDipentylphthalateContent of dry matter in weight percent of totalDry matterGaschromatographyGC combined with MSHigh resolution MS (high ability of MS to discriminatebetween masses)Limit of determination, concentration below which the resultis uncertainMilligram per kg dry weight (Parts Per Million, PPM)Microgram per kg dry weight (Parts Per Billion, PPB)Mass spectrometryNot detected, non-detectResult < 0 after subtraction of the blankDanish Environmental Protection AgencyNational Environmental Research Institute87
Page 2 and 3:
[Blank page]
Page 4 and 5:
Data sheetTitle:Phthalates and Nony
Page 6 and 7:
6.2 Sources 646.3 Model parameters
Page 8 and 9:
The physico-chemical processes in t
Page 10 and 11:
De fysisk-kemiske processer i fjord
Page 13:
2 PurposeThe aim of the study has b
Page 16 and 17:
In Table 3 the flow in the streams
Page 18 and 19:
3.3 Samples of fjord sedimentFinall
Page 21 and 22:
4 AnalyticalThe following substance
Page 23 and 24:
4.5 Standards and spikesThe labelle
Page 25 and 26:
In Table 9 the results of the test
Page 27:
The analysis was carried out as des
Page 30 and 31:
100Concentration ng/l90807060504030
Page 32 and 33:
400300DBP ng/l2001000JunJunSepDecMe
Page 34 and 35:
5.1.3 Monthly samples in Roskilde V
Page 36 and 37:
5.1.4 Analysis of varianceTo evalua
Page 38 and 39: Table 15 Correlations at Stations 2
Page 40 and 41: 500r = 0.86 (p=0.01)400DEHP ng/l al
Page 42 and 43: Table 16 Concentrations in fjord se
Page 44: tion levels off, ultimately approac
Page 47 and 48: 200NPNPDEConcentration, ng/g d.m.15
Page 49 and 50: was observed in the flow direction
Page 51 and 52: 1000800meanConcentration, ng/g dw60
Page 53 and 54: NPDE and DEHP in the Hove Å system
Page 55 and 56: µg/m²/y000800600400200013-Nov27-N
Page 57 and 58: 6 Mathematical data interpretationI
Page 59 and 60: 6.1.2 Sorption and solvationIn the
Page 61 and 62: Different standard methods can be u
Page 63 and 64: Introducing the concentration of se
Page 65 and 66: substances migrate more rapidly tha
Page 67 and 68: • In 1969 in connection with work
Page 69 and 70: SeaDispersion modelBox-modelsIsefjo
Page 71 and 72: AtmosphericdepositionxdxN wx + ∂
Page 73 and 74: tWater gridxo• • •i+1 i i-1x
Page 75 and 76: 6.4.3 Dynamic solution to the diffu
Page 77 and 78: The two diffusion curves and the tw
Page 79 and 80: Fluxsedimentation /Fluxtotal1,00,90
Page 81 and 82: µg DEHP / sec10008006004002000-200
Page 83 and 84: 7 ConclusionsDEHP was the most abun
Page 85 and 86: 8 ReferencesBerger, W.H. & Heath, G
Page 87: Smith, R. (1986): Mixing and Disper
Page 91 and 92: 10 VariablesA bred Surface area of
Page 93 and 94: N xN zq f,narrq p,narrQ 1Q 2Q 3Q br
Page 95: 11 AcknowledgementsThe authors wish
Page 98 and 99: 12.2 Figures, method for waterThe r
Page 100 and 101: 500400DPPMean + - sdRegression line
Page 102 and 103: 300250DnNPMean + - sdRegression lin
Page 104 and 105: 6000NPDEMean + - sdRegression line4
Page 106 and 107: 800600DnOPMean + - sdRegression lin
Page 108 and 109: Faglige rapporter fra DMU/NERI Tech
show all

Phthalates and Nonylphenols in Roskilde Fjord

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?