Causal effects on employment after first birth - A ... - University of York

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Lalive, R. and Zweimüller, J. (2009). How Does Parental Leave Affect Fertility and Return-to-Work?Evidence from Two Natural Experiments. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3):1363–1402.Lefebvre, P., Merrigan, P., and Verstraete, M. (2009). Dynamic labour supply <strong>effects</strong> of childcare subsidies:Evidence from a Canadian natural experiment on low-fee universal child care. Labour Economics,16:490–502.Mühler, G. (2010). Consequences of Mixed Provision of Child Care - An Overview on the German Market.ZEW Discussion Paper, 08-077 (2nd version).Miller, A. R. (2011). The Effects of Motherhood Timing on Career Path. Journal of Population Economics,24(3):1071–1100.OECD, editor (2002). OECD Employment Outlook, Chapter 2, Women at work: who are they and howare they faring? Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.OECD, editor (2007). Babies and Bosses. Reconciling Work and Family Life. A Synthesis of Findingsfor OECD Countries. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.Ondrich, J., Spieß, C. K., and Yang, Q. (1996). Barefoot and in a German kitchen: Federal parentalleave and benefit policy and the return to work after childbirth in Germany. Journal of PopulationEconomics, 9:247–266.Ondrich, J., Spieß, C. K., Yang, Q., and Wagner, G. (1999). Full time or part time? German parental leavepolicy and the return to work after childbirth in Germany. Research in Labor Economics, 18:41–74.Ondrich, J., Spieß, C. K., Yang, Q., and Wagner, G. G. (2003). The liberalization of maternity leavepolicy and the return to work after childbirth in Germany. Review of Economics of the Household,1(1-2):77–110.Pötzsch, O. (2005). Unterschiedliche Facetten der Geburtenentwicklung in Deutschland. Wirtschaft undStatistik, 6:569–581.Schönberg, U. and Ludsteck, J. (2007). Maternity Leave Legislation, Female Labor Supply, and theFamily Wage Gap. IZA Discussion Paper, 2699.Sianesi, B. (2004). An Evaluation of the Swedish System of Active Labor Market Programs in the 1990s.The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1):133–155.Sianesi, B. (2008). Differential Effects of Swedish Active Labor Market Programs for the Unemployed.Labour Economics, 15(3):370–399.Simonsen, M. and Skipper, L. (2006). The costs of motherhood: An analysis using matching estimators.Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21:919–934.Sommerfeld, K. (2009). Older Babies - More Active Mothers? How Maternal Labor Supply Changes asthe Child Grows. Schmollers Jahrbuch: Journal of Applied Social Science Studies, 129(2):227–240.Stein, Z. A. (1985). A woman’s age: Childbearing and child rearing. American Journal of Epidemiology,121(3):327–342.25
Troske, K. R. and Voicu, A. (2010). Joint estimation of sequential labor force participation and fertilitydecisions using markov chain monte carlo techniques. Labour Economics, 17(1):150 – 169.Troske, K. R. and Voicu, A. (2011). A Panel Data Analysis of Racial/Ethnic Differences in MarriedWomen’s Labor Supply. IZA Discussion Paper, 5729.van Ham, M. and Büchel, F. (2004). Females’ Willingness to Work and the Discouragement Effect of aPoor Local Childcare Provision. Applied Economics Quarterly, 4:363–377.Vogel, C. (2009). Teilzeitbeschäftigung - Ausmaß und Bestimmungsgründe der Erwerbsübergänge vonFrauen. Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung - Journal for Labor Market Research (ZAF), 42(2):170–181.Wilde, E. T., Batchelder, L., and Ellwood, D. T. (2010). The Mommy Track Divides: The Impact ofChildbearing on Wages of Women of Differing Skill Levels. NBER Working Paper, 16582.Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. The MIT Press.Wrohlich, K. (2004). Child care costs and mother’s labor supply: An empirical analysis for Germany.DIW, 412.Ziefle, A. (2004). Die individuellen Kosten des Erziehungsurlaubs: Eine empirische Analyse der kurzundlängerfristigen Folgen für den Karriereverlauf von Frauen. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung(WZB).AppendixTable 1: Child allowance by birth order in EuroYear 1st child 2nd child 3rd child Higher parity1992 - 1995 35.79 66.47 112.48 122.711996 102.26 102.26 153.39 178.951997 - 1998 112.48 112.48 153.39 178.951999 127.82 127.82 153.39 178.952000 - 2001 138.05 138.05 153.39 178.952002 - 2008 154.00 154.00 154.00 179.0026
Page 3 and 4: This reform increases the income su
Page 5 and 6: a similar propensity to have a firs
Page 7 and 8: our empirical analysis, we will onl
Page 9 and 10: 3.1 Dynamic Treatment ApproachThe t
Page 11 and 12: an average counterfactual outcome f
Page 13 and 14: Correspondingly, the alignment betw
Page 15 and 16: pose a problem if the selection of
Page 17 and 18: drops to zero due to mandatory mate
Page 19 and 20: for university graduates (17 months
Page 21 and 22: of the interaction variables, where
Page 23 and 24: 6 ConclusionsIn a critical phase of
Page 25: Fortin, N. (2009). Gender role atti
Page 29 and 30: Table 3: Propensity to have first c
Page 31 and 32: Figure 3: Partnership one yearbefor
Page 33 and 34: Figure 9: ATTs for different educat
Page 35 and 36: Treatment groupFigure 11: Childbirt

Causal effects on employment after first birth - A ... - University of York

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?