13.07.2015 Views

Wynehamer v People.pdf - The University of Texas at Austin

Wynehamer v People.pdf - The University of Texas at Austin

Wynehamer v People.pdf - The University of Texas at Austin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

482 CASES IN THE COURT OP APPEALS.<strong>Wynehamer</strong> against <strong>The</strong> <strong>People</strong>.This being so, it follows inevitably th<strong>at</strong> the occasion andnecessity for the exercise <strong>of</strong> the power embodied in ast<strong>at</strong>ute is wholly a m<strong>at</strong>ter <strong>of</strong> legisl<strong>at</strong>ive judgment and discretion,where no constitutional restriction intervenes, withwhich no other power in the government has any right tointerfere, <strong>at</strong> least after the executive sanction has beengiven. If the legisl<strong>at</strong>ure shall determine th<strong>at</strong> the occasionhas arisen or th<strong>at</strong> the necessity exists for the exercise <strong>of</strong> amore extended and stringent power than it has hithertoexercised, who shall decide to the contrary ? Wh<strong>at</strong> othertribunal is clothed with power to entertain an appeal andreverse such determin<strong>at</strong>ion ? <strong>The</strong> veto power given to theexecutive is the only authority the constitution has provided,and th<strong>at</strong> must be exercised before legisl<strong>at</strong>ion hasripened into st<strong>at</strong>utes, and is then not necessarily conclusive.Whoever bestows the slightest reflection upon the n<strong>at</strong>ureand character <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>fice, will see th<strong>at</strong> courts canantertain no such question; and any <strong>at</strong>tempt on their partto take cognizance <strong>of</strong> it, and to draw it within their jurisdiction,would be a clear invasion <strong>of</strong> the legisl<strong>at</strong>ive provinceand a usurp<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> legisl<strong>at</strong>ive power.<strong>The</strong> spectacle <strong>of</strong> a conflict between toe represent<strong>at</strong>ives<strong>of</strong> the legisl<strong>at</strong>ive and the judicial sovereignty <strong>of</strong> the peoplerespecting a question <strong>of</strong> this character, upon any otherthan cleaf, undoubted, constitutional grounds, would, <strong>at</strong>this day, be <strong>at</strong> once novel and alarming. Every legisl<strong>at</strong>iveact, when questioned, is to be brought to the test <strong>of</strong> theconstitution, and if the power exercised is not there forbiddenin express terms, or by clear and necessary implic<strong>at</strong>ion,courts have no discretion, but are bound to pronounceit valid. <strong>The</strong> right <strong>of</strong> courts to declare legisl<strong>at</strong>ive enactments,in derog<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the constitution, void, is one whichhas been too long and steadily exercised in this country tobe now doubted or questioned. It is, however, one <strong>of</strong> thehighest and most delic<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> all conserv<strong>at</strong>ive powers, and isnever to be exercised against the acts <strong>of</strong> the superior branch

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!