13.07.2015 Views

Wynehamer v People.pdf - The University of Texas at Austin

Wynehamer v People.pdf - The University of Texas at Austin

Wynehamer v People.pdf - The University of Texas at Austin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

382 CASES IN THE COURT OP .APPEALS.<strong>Wynehamer</strong> against <strong>The</strong> <strong>People</strong>.ported liquor; and th<strong>at</strong> he, the witness, on the occasionaforesaid, seized and took into his possession the bottle <strong>of</strong>brandy from which the defendant sold, and the bottle <strong>of</strong>champagne which he had sold and was in the act <strong>of</strong> delivering.<strong>The</strong> foregoing is the substance <strong>of</strong> all the evidence.<strong>The</strong> court found the defendant guilty <strong>of</strong> selling and havingin his possession with intent to sell, intoxic<strong>at</strong>ing liquors, ascharged in the complaint, adjudged him guilty <strong>of</strong> a misdemeanor,and sentenced him to pay a fine <strong>of</strong> $50, and 15.87costs <strong>of</strong> the proceedings, and th<strong>at</strong> he be imprisoned untilthe same were paid, not exceeding fifty-six days. <strong>The</strong>court further adjudged th<strong>at</strong> the liquor seized be forfeited,and th<strong>at</strong> a warrant for its destruction be issued. On appealby the defendant, the judgment was reversed by the supremecourt <strong>at</strong> a general term in the second district. (See 20Barb., 16S.) <strong>The</strong> people appealed to this court.A. J. Parker, for the plaintiff in error, in the case firstentitled.A. Sawin, for the people.J. M. Van Cott, for the people, in the case secondly entitledJohn A. Lott, for the defendant.<strong>The</strong> opinion by COMSTOCK, J., and th<strong>at</strong> by T. A. JOHN­SON first inserted, and by MITCHELL secondly inserted,were delivered in the case <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wynehamer</strong>, first aboveentitled. <strong>The</strong> other opinions, except th<strong>at</strong> by DENIO, 0. J.,which st<strong>at</strong>es his conclusions as to both cases, were deliveredin the case <strong>of</strong> Toynbee.COMSTOCK, J. <strong>The</strong> defendant, Wynehammer, was indictedand convicted by a common-law jury, in the court <strong>of</strong> sessions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!