05.12.2012 Views

TT_Vol3 Issue2 - Raytheon

TT_Vol3 Issue2 - Raytheon

TT_Vol3 Issue2 - Raytheon

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Sea Power 21: NCO’s Vision for<br />

Maritime Operations in the 21st<br />

Century.<br />

• Operational Maneuver From the<br />

Sea: Commandant’s Vision for<br />

Marine Corps Projection of Naval<br />

Power Ashore.<br />

• Air Force Vision 2020: CSAF Vision for<br />

Air Operations into the 21st Century.<br />

To adequately understand these documents,<br />

the CFM process distills the visions down to<br />

a few important statements and then validates<br />

the key themes through customer<br />

interactions. For example, the above vision<br />

documents all have a common theme as<br />

they describe the future:<br />

• “The services want to fight Joint”<br />

• “The services want to mass effects<br />

not forces”<br />

• “The services want to fight Non<br />

Linear”<br />

• “The services want to influence two<br />

to three times more battlespace than<br />

they do today”<br />

• “The services want to be ready to<br />

fight in less time”<br />

To achieve the services’ “Future Vision”,<br />

doctrinal and material changes will follow<br />

as a matter of course. These changes<br />

include:<br />

• The Line of Sight (LOS) engagement<br />

will occur by exception not by rule<br />

• The dominant killer on the battlefield<br />

will be Non-Line Of Sight (NLOS)<br />

weapons<br />

• Persistent situational awareness is<br />

essential to executing these concepts<br />

• The force must be more agile and<br />

deployable<br />

• The way we perform BMC4I today<br />

will have to change<br />

The Reference Architecture provides the<br />

conceptual framework for specifying the<br />

four aspects (social, cognitive, information<br />

and physical) of systems within the bounds<br />

of operational, system and technical views<br />

prescribed by the DoD Architecture<br />

Framework (DoDAF). It also provides architectural<br />

guidelines for domain-specific<br />

implementations, while allowing a range of<br />

design solutions. Finally, it defines the architectural<br />

patterns for discussion and analysis<br />

purposes, how the patterns communicate<br />

with each other, the basic operations associated<br />

with each pattern and the nature of<br />

the communications. In the NCO Case<br />

Study the patterns included:<br />

• Common Decision and Execution<br />

Capability (CDEC) Architectural<br />

Pattern<br />

– A remote, distributed, and nondedicated<br />

BMC2 system that<br />

develops, builds, and executes<br />

optimum real-time kill chains from<br />

all available Communications,<br />

Sensors, C2, Platforms and<br />

Effectors.<br />

• Infosphere Architectural Pattern<br />

– Encyclopedia of past, present and<br />

predicted state<br />

– A combat information<br />

management system that<br />

integrates, aggregates,<br />

and distributes information in<br />

appropriate form and level of<br />

detail to users at all echelons.<br />

• Global Communications Grid<br />

Architectural Pattern<br />

– Communications mechanism for<br />

element interactions<br />

– An integrated wideband<br />

communications, netted sensor, and<br />

advanced data fusion system that<br />

employs the Infosphere and the<br />

CDEC as they are developed.<br />

• Strategic Planning Functional Pattern<br />

– The definition and allocation of<br />

resources for a mission<br />

– Provides strategic to campaign level<br />

planning to include worldwide data<br />

base access and fusion in support of<br />

the Warfighting Function<br />

• Logistics Functional Pattern<br />

– The supply of resources specified in<br />

plans supporting the tactical and<br />

operational application of<br />

combat power<br />

– Includes global logistics and<br />

sustainment elements in support of<br />

the warfighting function<br />

• Execution (warfighting, peacekeeping,<br />

policing, etc.) Functional Pattern<br />

– The enactment of the strategic plan<br />

using the resources supplied and<br />

maintained by logistics<br />

– Contains all the elements required<br />

to effectively employ resources<br />

and effects.<br />

Through Customer-Focused Marketing and<br />

interactions, the CONOPS for Net-Centric<br />

Operations is captured and mapped onto<br />

the Reference Architecture in an iterative<br />

process. The Reference Architecture provides<br />

viewpoints (from the perspective of<br />

key stakeholders) to validate the patterns.<br />

The domain layers are used as constraints<br />

on the development of domain specific<br />

architectures defined by individual programs.<br />

The effectiveness of the resulting<br />

architectures is then evaluated through<br />

modeling and simulation, and limited<br />

objective experiments and demonstrations.<br />

The final results are then fed back into the<br />

Reference Architecture maintenance process<br />

to validate or drive changes to the core<br />

Reference Architecture.<br />

The reference architecture process described<br />

in this article is leading the way to the<br />

development of a seamlessly integrated<br />

network of remoted, distributed, non-dedicated<br />

components, creating warfighter<br />

dominance through information superiority.<br />

The NCO patterns (sensors, effectors and<br />

Command and Control) described above<br />

are used in the Reference Architecture to<br />

provide guidance to the domain-specific<br />

architects in each strategic <strong>Raytheon</strong> business<br />

area. <strong>Raytheon</strong>’s domain expertise<br />

spans the breadth of Net-Centric<br />

Operations, from sensing to distributed<br />

command and control, to effects, and<br />

finally to complex systems integration. �<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!