THE WAR ON DRUGS PROFILING WOMEN OF COLOR IN THE WAR ON DRUGSRacial disparities in arrests, convictions, and incarceration of women of color are clearly connected to theconsiderable discretion exercised by law enforcement agents waging the “war on drugs” when deciding whom tostop, search, and arrest. 12 Law enforcement interactions with women of color are clearly informed by perceptions oftheir bodies as vessels for drugs ingested, swallowed or concealed.Frankie Perkins, a black mother of three on her way home in Chicago one evening in 1997, wascrossing an empty lot when she was stopped, and subsequently choked, by police officers wholater claimed that they had seen her swallowing drugs and were trying to get her to spitthem up. Autopsy photos revealed bruises on her face and rib cage, and showed her eyesswollen shut. The cause of death was listed as strangulation. No drugs were recovered. In asimilar incident in south Seattle, Theresa Henderson was choked by police who claimed thatshe tried to swallow a small amount of cocaine. 13A 2000 U.S. government General Accounting Office study revealed that women of color – be they African American,African, Latina, or from the Caribbean – are frequently stereotyped by law enforcement agents as couriers in theinternational drug trade. As a result, they are disproportionately targeted for strip searches as part of borderinterdiction activities, even though they are less likely than white women to actually be transporting drugs. Blackwomen appear to be most often subject to a presumption that they were acting as drug “mules” or couriers andcarrying drugs concealed on or in their person. According to the GAO, among United States citizens, black womenwere nine times more likely than white women to be X-rayed after being frisked or patted down. However,African-American women were less than half as likely to be found carrying contraband as white women. 14In 1996, Sandra Antor, a nursing student and Sunday school teacher, was pulled over by aSouth Carolina state trooper as she was driving down Interstate 95 on her way home toFlorida, ripped from her car, shoved to the ground on a busy highway, and beaten before beingtaken into custody. The officer later cited the possibility that Sandra may have beentransporting drugs as justification for his actions. 15Although law enforcement interactions with women of color beyond the customs context have received considerablyless attention, such stereotypes extend beyond the border. Women of color also report frequent, and often abusive,strip searches by local and state law enforcement officers in search of drugs.Danni Tyson was arrested on a subway train on her way to pick up her daughter from swimpractice, and subsequently strip-searched at a Manhattan police station. During the search,she was asked to lift up her breasts to show that she was not hiding drugs, and subjected toracialized ridicule. 16Please visit www.incite-national.org for more info! P. 30
THE WAR ON DRUGS POLICING MOTHERHOODThe “war on drugs” has also given rise to greater surveillance andpolicing of women of color’s reproduction. Selective testing ofpregnant women of color for drug use and heightened surveillance ofpoor mothers of color in the context of policing child abuse and neglectare gender-specific manifestations of the “war on drugs.” 17An estimated 200 women in more than 30 states have been prosecutedon charges of “drug delivery,” “drug possession,” or “fetal/child abuse”based on evidence of drug use during pregnancy. 18 In the state ofSouth Carolina, drug use by pregnant women has been legallyconstrued as child abuse. In 2000, Regina McKnight was convicted ofhomicide and sentenced to twelve years in prison for suffering astillbirth. (McKnight v. South Carolina, South Carolina Superior Courtin Horry County, 2000) Instead of being offered rehabilitation ortreatment, pregnant women are reported by their doctors to lawenforcement, shackled and arrested, and prosecuted under state childabuse laws.In a program developed through a collaboration betweenlocal law enforcement, hospital officials, and the localprosecutor’s office, the public hospital in Charleston, SC,which serves a predominantly Black population, selectivelydrug tested pregnant women who seemed “likely” by thehospital’s criteria to have drug abuse problems.Hospital staff reported positive tests to the police whowould then arrest the women, sometimes shackling themto the bed while in labor, often taking them to jail withinminutes of giving birth, while still bleeding and in pain.Twenty-nine of the thirty women prosecuted under thispolicy were Black, and the 30th was reported by onenurse to have a “negro boyfriend.” 19Art by Cristy C. Road, croadcore.orgPlease visit www.incite-national.org for more info! P. 31
- Page 1: LAW ENFORCEMENT VIOLENCEAGAINST WOM
- Page 5 and 6: INTRODUCTION WHO IS INCITE! WOMEN O
- Page 7 and 8: INTRODUCTION HOW CAN I USE THIS TOO
- Page 10 and 11: POLICING GENDERTrans and gender non
- Page 12 and 13: POLICING GENDER ENDNOTES1TransJusti
- Page 14 and 15: KHAKI & BLUE: A KILLER COMBINATION
- Page 16 and 17: Please visit www.incite-national.or
- Page 18 and 19: IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENTHaime Flores
- Page 20 and 21: IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT ENDNOTES1Ov
- Page 22: “QUALITY OF LIFE” & “ZERO TOL
- Page 26: COPS...IN SCHOOLS??!! WHO IS IMPACT
- Page 29 and 30: POLICING SEX WORKAs is the case wit
- Page 31 and 32: POLICING SEX WORKSEXUAL HARASSMENT,
- Page 33: THE WAR ON DRUGS WHAT IS THE WAR ON
- Page 37 and 38: NATIVE WOMEN, NATIVE TRANS PEOPLE,
- Page 39 and 40: NATIVE WOMEN, NATIVE TRANS PEOPLE,
- Page 41 and 42: POLICE VIOLENCE & DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
- Page 43 and 44: POLICE VIOLENCE & DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
- Page 45 and 46: POLICE VIOLENCE & DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
- Page 47 and 48: RAPE, SEXUAL ASSAULT, & SEXUAL HARA
- Page 49 and 50: RAPE, SEXUAL ASSAULT, & SEXUAL HARA
- Page 51 and 52: RAPE, SEXUAL ASSAULT, & SEXUAL HARA
- Page 53 and 54: LAW ENFORCEMENT VIOLENCE & DISASTER
- Page 55 and 56: LAW ENFORCEMENT VIOLENCE & DISASTER
- Page 57: RESISTING LAW ENFORCEMENT VIOLENCEO
- Page 60 and 61: RESISTING LAW ENFORCEMENT VIOLENCEP
- Page 62 and 63: Please visit www.incite-national.or
- Page 65 and 66: KNOW YOUR RIGHTS!!!KNOW YOUR RIGHTS
- Page 67 and 68: KNOW YOUR RIGHTS!!SEARCH INCIDENT T
- Page 69 and 70: CRITICAL LESSONS FROM THE NEW JERSE
- Page 71 and 72: CRITICAL LESSONS FROM THE NEW JERSE
- Page 73 and 74: ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITY ACCOUNTABI
- Page 77 and 78: Support Our Work!Join: The S.O.S. C
- Page 79 and 80: KNOW YOUR RIGHTS!Police violence an
- Page 81 and 82: WHAT CAN WE DO?We have been taught
- Page 83 and 84: PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH WHAT
- Page 85 and 86:
PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCHFIERCE
- Page 87 and 88:
This survey is being conducted by S
- Page 91 and 92:
FIERCE! Survey on Police Harassment
- Page 93 and 94:
DisabilityOther (please explain):16
- Page 97 and 98:
The 100 Stories ProjectRaise Your V
- Page 99 and 100:
The Martus database allows us to en
- Page 101 and 102:
Safe Streets Community Survey #1Nam
- Page 103 and 104:
Have you ever changed your behavior
- Page 105 and 106:
This survey is from a group of orga
- Page 107 and 108:
SAMPLE WORKSHOPSAMPLE WORKSHOP ON L
- Page 109 and 110:
SAMPLE WORKSHOPQuestion 5 - What is
- Page 111 and 112:
CRITICAL RESISTANCE - INCITE! STATE
- Page 113 and 114:
CRITICAL RESISTANCE - INCITE! STATE
- Page 115 and 116:
RESOURCES & ORGANIZATIONSThe follow
- Page 117 and 118:
RESOURCES & ORGANIZATIONSFenced OUT
- Page 119 and 120:
RESOURCE CDThis toolkit is accompan
- Page 121:
EVALUATIONWE REALLY APPRECIATE YOUR