05.12.2012 Views

ORAU TEAM Dose Reconstruction Project for NIOSH

ORAU TEAM Dose Reconstruction Project for NIOSH

ORAU TEAM Dose Reconstruction Project for NIOSH

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Document No. <strong>ORAU</strong>T-TKBS-0041 Revision No. 01 Effective Date: 06/02/2009 Page 44 of 89<br />

plutonium from Han<strong>for</strong>d. If the actual age of the fuel is known (such as from an incident investigation<br />

report), then that age can be used in the intake and dose analysis.<br />

5.2 IN VITRO BIOASSAY<br />

The bioassay program <strong>for</strong> NUMEC workers primarily involved urine and fecal sampling <strong>for</strong> isotopes of<br />

uranium, plutonium, 241 Am. Occasional analyses were per<strong>for</strong>med <strong>for</strong> fission products (FPs) and 232 Th.<br />

The reported bioassay data generally includes a measurement error that indicates the detection level.<br />

The bioassay analyses are described in the following sections.<br />

Table 5-3. Activity composition of Han<strong>for</strong>d reference fuel-grade plutonium mixture (12%). a<br />

Mixture<br />

designation Specific Activity (Ci/g)<br />

Years of<br />

0-yr 5-yr 10-yr 15-yr 20-yr<br />

aging b<br />

Pu-238 1.71E-02 1.64E-02 1.58E-02 1.52E-02 1.46E-02<br />

Pu-239 5.26E-02 5.26E-02 5.26E-02 5.26E-02 5.26E-02<br />

Pu-240 2.72E-02 2.72E-02 2.72E-02 2.72E-02 2.72E-02<br />

Pu-241 3.09E+00 2.43E+00 1.91E+00 1.50E+00 1.18E+00<br />

Pu-242 3.93E-06 3.93E-06 3.93E-06 3.93E-06 3.93E-06<br />

Am-241 0.00E+00 2.19E-02 3.89E-02 5.22E-02 6.24E-02<br />

a. Source: <strong>ORAU</strong>T (2007a).<br />

b. Time since separation of the Am-241 from the plutonium mix.<br />

Several bioassay vendors were used to evaluate in vitro bioassay samples <strong>for</strong> the NUMEC sites. The<br />

SEC evaluations <strong>for</strong> the NUMEC Apollo site (<strong>NIOSH</strong> 2007c) and the NUMEC Parks Township site<br />

(<strong>NIOSH</strong> 2008) indicated that Controls <strong>for</strong> Environmental Pollution has been implicated in the<br />

falsification of data and that its bioassay analyses provided to NUMEC cannot be considered reliable.<br />

Bioassay data from Controls <strong>for</strong> Environmental Pollution should only be used to indicate the potential<br />

<strong>for</strong> exposure to a particular radionuclide on a particular date. The data cannot be used in a dose<br />

reconstruction to evaluate intakes or assign internal dose.<br />

The in vitro bioassay records <strong>for</strong> individuals nearly always include an indication of the detection level<br />

<strong>for</strong> the measurement. <strong>Dose</strong> reconstructors should use the listed detection level in<strong>for</strong>mation in<br />

evaluation of intakes <strong>for</strong> specific radionuclides when available, except as noted below <strong>for</strong> urine<br />

bioassay data from Controls <strong>for</strong> Radiation in the early years (1961 to 1965).<br />

5.2.1<br />

Plutonium Urine and Feces Bioassay<br />

Plutonium might have been present at the NUMEC facilities in several <strong>for</strong>ms that include type M,<br />

type S, and possibly type Super S material solubility categories. The intake analysis based on<br />

bioassay monitoring results should evaluate intakes based on all three types and use the type<br />

providing the highest dose estimate.<br />

5.2.1.1 Plutonium Urine Minimum Detectable Concentrations and Frequencies<br />

Plutonium-239 was analyzed in urine from about 1962 to 1999, and 241 Am was analyzed starting in<br />

about 1966. The minimum detectable concentrations (MDCs) are listed in Table 5-4 <strong>for</strong> NUMEC<br />

facilities. If an MDC value is needed prior to the dates listed in the table, the values <strong>for</strong> the earliest<br />

date should be used. Note that no bioassay monitoring results were found between 1985 and 1999.<br />

In addition, because one health physics department was responsible <strong>for</strong> the bioassay program at both<br />

the Apollo and Parks Township sites, it is difficult to determine from the reported bioassay results if<br />

the employee worked at the Apollo or Parks Township site. It is likely that much of the plutonium<br />

bioassay results were <strong>for</strong> work at the Parks Township site.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!