31.07.2015 Views

Advances in the stereoselective synthesis of antifungal agents and ...

Advances in the stereoselective synthesis of antifungal agents and ...

Advances in the stereoselective synthesis of antifungal agents and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 6 1406.3 Cyclization <strong>of</strong> racemic <strong>and</strong> enantiopure 1-Aryl-2-propyn-1-ols 58-a-c,e,h-l to Aryl-benzo[b]furane methanols 27-g,l,h<strong>and</strong> 63-a-d.The optimal reaction conditions described <strong>in</strong> paragraph 6.2.3 wereapplied to racemic <strong>and</strong> enantiopure 1-Aryl-2-propyn-1-ols 58-a-c,e,h-l<strong>in</strong> order to explore <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> this reaction for <strong>the</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>of</strong>enantiopure Aryl-benzo[b]furane methanols 27-g,l,h <strong>and</strong> 63-a-d. Thereaction was always applied first to <strong>the</strong> racemic compound <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n to <strong>the</strong>enantiopure substrate (scheme 6.8).HOH58-a-c,e,h-lRPdCl 2 [P(Ph) 3 ] 2 ; CuITMG, Ar, 40°2-IodophenolOOH27-g,l,h,63-a-dRScheme 6.8: Cyclization <strong>of</strong> racemic <strong>and</strong> enantiopure 1-Aryl-2-propyn-1-ols 58-a-c,e,hlto Aryl-benzo[b]furane methanols 27 g,l,h <strong>and</strong> 63a-d.The results were very satisfactory <strong>in</strong>deed as reported <strong>in</strong> table 6.5.Yields were calculated follow<strong>in</strong>g flash chromatography. This purificationcan be considered a mere filtration through silica s<strong>in</strong>ce after work up <strong>the</strong>products were always quite pure as judged by NMR <strong>and</strong> TLC. They were,however, still colored yellow/brown. The enantiomeric excess wasdeterm<strong>in</strong>ed by chiral HPLC <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crude materials (after <strong>the</strong> reactionwork up) prior to purification. It is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note that <strong>the</strong> e.e. did notchange from <strong>the</strong> chiral start<strong>in</strong>g material to <strong>the</strong> product before <strong>and</strong> afterpurification.This method gave very reproducible results both <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong>chemical yields <strong>and</strong> enantiomeric excess. From <strong>the</strong> results shown <strong>in</strong> table6.5 it is clear that different substituents on <strong>the</strong> aromatic r<strong>in</strong>g did not leadto any modification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results.They were also not <strong>in</strong>fluenced by <strong>the</strong> position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> substituent on<strong>the</strong> aromatic r<strong>in</strong>g (see entries 3,4,8,9,12,13; table 5.6) nor bystereoelectronic effects (see entries 1,2,3,4,5,6; table 5.6).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!