10.08.2015 Views

Wind Erosion in Western Queensland Australia

Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One

Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 2.11 Conceptual model of land erodibility, expressed as a function ofsurface roughness effects due to vegetation cover (top) and soilerodibility (bottom). Land erodibility is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the relativeconditions of surface roughness and soil erodibility. In turn, thesecontrols are regulated by climate and land management conditions. ..............66Chapter 3: Approaches to Modell<strong>in</strong>g Land Erodibility to <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong>Figure 3.1 Space-time plot show<strong>in</strong>g the spatial and temporal scales of w<strong>in</strong>derosion models reviewed <strong>in</strong> this chapter. Light gray boxes representfield scale models (Section 3.2), white boxes represent regional scalemodels (Section 3.3), and dark gray boxes represent global scalemodels (Section 3.4) ........................................................................................70Chapter 4: A Framework for Modell<strong>in</strong>g Temporal Variations <strong>in</strong> SoilErodibilityFigure 4.1 Flow chart illustrat<strong>in</strong>g the relationships between soil erodibilitycontrols with<strong>in</strong> a landscape. Grey boxes represent environmentalconditions and processes that determ<strong>in</strong>e soil surface conditions and theimpact of disturbance mechanisms on the availability of loose erodiblematerial ..........................................................................................................100Figure 4.2 Graphs illustrat<strong>in</strong>g the effect of (a) chang<strong>in</strong>g the non-erodible fractionof a soil (%DA > 0.84 mm) on (b) the position of the curve def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gthe relationship between soil clay content (percentage clay) and soilerodibility as <strong>in</strong>dicated by the streamwise sediment flux (Q,represented by circles) at a w<strong>in</strong>d velocity of 65 kmh -1 (after Leys et al.,1996). .............................................................................................................107Figure 4.3 3D plot of the soil erodibility cont<strong>in</strong>uum as def<strong>in</strong>ed by the soilerodibility (<strong>in</strong>dicated by Q gm -1 s -1 ) relationship with soil clay content(percentage clay) and aggregate size distribution that controls thequantity of non-erodible soil aggregates (%DA > 0.84 mm).........................109Figure 4.4 A conceptual diagram of the movement of a soil through the erodibilitycont<strong>in</strong>uum from m<strong>in</strong>imum (Q m<strong>in</strong> ) to maximum (Q max ) erodibilitystates. The diagram <strong>in</strong>dicates three phases of movement: (i) acondition of m<strong>in</strong>imum erodibility, (ii) a transition phase of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gxvi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!