and the faint glow of NGC 7538 will enterthe view. If you use a low power to yield63×, NGC 7538 is a dull gray oval glowaround two faint stars. At 88×magnification, the oval, extending fromnorthwest to southeast, fans out and isslightly brighter at the northwest end.NGC 7538 “brightens” moderately withthe use of a UHC filter, but even at higherpower, none of the filamentary structurementioned in Burnham’s was revealed tome.As a member of the Finest NGC list,NGC 7129 was a familiar visual object forme, and I was delighted that it was alsoincluded in a talk given by Dr. Chris Purtonat a monthly centre meeting. In his studiesof Dissociating Stars, Dr. Purton has thusfar only found 3 such stars in our galaxy,and one of them makes its home in NGC7129. Dissociating Stars are believed tobe newly formed stars that can be identifiedby the presence of their surroundingatomic hydrogen nebulae, which can bedetected in radio signals at a 21-cmwavelength. The 10 th magnitude type Bstar (BD65+6138) is surrounded by anatomic nebula of over 3.5 light-years inextent, much larger than the visual sizeof NGC 7129. Dr. Purton estimates thatthis dissociating star is only 1000 to 1800years old, a mere infant by cosmologicalstandards! At my low power of 63×, NGC7129 is seen as a moderate glow arounda small triangle of stars. At 158× a brightknot of nebulosity appears star-like onthe north edge of the triangle, to make asquashed diamond shape. It may be thatthe two easterly stars of the triangle areactually nebulosity, but they appear stellarin my scope. Amazingly there are fourother reflection nebulae easily containedwithin this narrow (0.4°) field. I was ableto pick out the faint combined glow ofIC 5133 and IC 5132, appearing as a meagermist around an L-shaped asterism justnorth of NGC 7129. Using averted visionwith some tube movement I was just ableto detect the subtle glow of IC 5134 arounda star near the edge of the field to thenortheast.It is little wonder, with this plethoraof mirrored majesty, that confusion reignedin the royal house of reflections when Iwent in search of NGC 7133, the fourthcompanion to NGC 7129. Unlike the ICobjects, the reclusive NGC 7133 is listedby Burnham’s, but it is so much a part ofNGC 7129 that I kept overlooking it. Afterfailing to positively locate NGC 7133 anumber of times, I examined a DigitalSky Survey image of the area, wherein thefaint cloud of NGC 7133 is shown snuggledup to the south-east edge of NGC 7129.Using a 10-mm Radian eyepiece (158×)for a lengthy observation of over an hourI was able to detect NGC 7133 for just afew brief periods when the diffuse glowwould burst into averted visionmomentarily. I am not confident of thisobservation as it may well be that, likethe Emperor, I was fueled by suggestionprovided by the photograph and saw onlywhat I hoped to see.Presenting a real challenge to thisobserver, NGC 7822 well deserves its firstplace position on the RASC ChallengeObjects list. Using open cluster NGC 7762and its 5 th magnitude companion star asa convenient pointer, I had to sweep 5 or6 times to the northeast before the subtleglow of NGC 7822 registered on myconsciousness. This near 2-degree gullwingedarc of faint nebulosity is bestappreciated by drifting beyond the cloudto the bordering inky blackness. Aftergrowing familiar with the contours I couldfollow the northern edge with some ease.On a night of excellent seeing at the MountKobau Star Party I noticed dark lanessweeping from west to east within thisdusty denizen of the king’s realm.After completing the project witha 12.5-inch mirror I re-observed with my8-inch Celestron Starhopper Dobsonian.Of the six reflection nebulae listed byBurnham’s only NGC 7133 refused to yieldto the 8-inch aperture. The guidepostsof Struve 2816 and a subdued NGC 7762remain relevant, and reacting very wellto the use of averted vision, NGC 7023showed its N-S extension. A first-timepositive observation of NGC 7822 withan 8-inch mirror may have been more ofa challenge than I could have met, butlike shadow ripples on a pond, the subtlewaves of reflection were there.My experience exploring the reflectivecloak of Cepheus has been an enjoyablechallenge, and I encourage others to accepthis royal patronage.Guy Mackie enjoys observing from the clearand dark hillsides near Kelowna, BritishColumbia. He recently completed the RASCMessier list, and over half of the Finest NGCObjects with his 8-inch Dobsonian. He enjoysskiing, hiking, and camping with his family.260JRASCDecember / décembre 2000
Orbital OdditiesConjunction Junctionby Bruce McCurdy (bmccurdy@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca)Ihave long been captivated by the musicof the spheres. The interplay amongthe orbits of the planets, their satellites,and debris of the solar system, results inan enormous variety of harmonics,resonances, and variations on a theme.The cyclical interactions among afascinating cast of characters can rangefrom the subtle but steady rhythmicbuildup of an occultation series to thecymbal crash of a total eclipse.In this first article of what I hopebecomes a series, let’s look at interactionsbetween Earth and Venus, which arelargely played out in the “simple” timesignature of 13:8.I made my first acquaintance withthe planets in the winter of 1985. A friendpointed out a fine conjunction betweenMars and Venus, which I had neverpreviously identified despite havingachieved the ripe old age of twentysomething.I expected the more famous(at least in science fiction circles) Marsto be the more impressive object, but itwas a relatively faint red dot about 1% asbright as its companion. It was Venustherefore that left the lasting impressionof a neighbouring world; in fact, despiteMars’ reputation, in many ways Venus isthe more Earth-like planet in diameterand mass, not to mention its acid rainand greenhouse effect. Its large, steady,and brilliant spot of pure white is a sightthat to this day has never failed to bringme pleasure.As Sky & Telescope’s E. C. Krupp oncewrote in an attention-grabbing openingsentence, Venus was “named by theRomans for the voluptuous goddess oferotic love.” To the telescopic observer,The relationship between transits and occultations of Venus is depicted in this pair of diagrams.Whereas transits occur in pairs (as shown upcoming in 2004 and 2012) or even single events,occultation series last much longer due to perspective effects. In the first case Venus’ heliocentriclatitude (distance from the ecliptic) is greatly exaggerated by its close proximity to Earth; in theother it appears compressed due to the planet’s position beyond the Sun at superior conjunction.The chords of the successive occultations are therefore roughly six times closer together thanthose of the transits. In the transits shown, Venus moves east to west (left to right) relative tothe Sun near its descending node, and in the opposite direction near the ascending node duringthe occultations. Note that the chords are not precisely parallel due to the gradual eastwarddisplacement of the node from one event to the next (diagrams courtesy of Russell D. Sampsonand the author).however, Venus is downright demure,never shedding her atmospheric veil forany man, no matter what size hisinstrument! Surface details which arebrazenly strutted by the Moon and moregrudgingly revealed by Mars are foreverhidden on Venus by a bland yet crushinglydense, poisonous atmosphere. Theearthbound observer must therefore becontent watching dramatic changes inour sister planet’s size and shape as herdistance from us varies by a factor of sixduring each cycle.This past June Venus reached thefar side of its orbit as seen from Earth,its so-called superior conjunction. Butthis wasn’t any old superior conjunction;in 2000 June Venus was in fact occultedby the Sun, an unobservable but notuninteresting event that occurs on averageless than once per decade. This occultationapproximates the reverse of a still-rarerphenomenon: a transit of Venus acrossthe face of the Sun. One of the most eagerlyDecember/ décembre 2000 JRASC261