feral <strong>feminisms</strong>Complicities, Connections, & Struggles:Critical Transnational Feminist Analysisof Settler Colonialismissue 4 . summer 2015Reading the Landscape of U.S. SettlerColonialism in Southern OʻahuEllen-Rae Cacholaimbalanced yin and yang of the global order due to the “Westphalian World” encroaching uponmore space than “Multiple Worlds” (Ling 2014). Ling suggests Thich Nhat Hanh’s concept ofinterbeing to address this imbalance: rather than “Multiple Worlds” absorbing the tendencies ofrigid separation and ignorance of the “Westphalian World,” “Multiple Worlds” can choose toperform a different kind of relationship based on transforming “Westphalia World” throughcommitted, ethical engagement (Ling 2014, 22). This model of international and interculturalrelationality is exhibited in the IWNAM’s own process, as they seek to create a different kind ofculture of international relations, among women who come from Westphalian Worlds andSubaltern Worlds, that begins to transform each individual who participates in the gathering;that individual would then take that ethic—a non-hegemonic way of seeing and being withdifference—to their own country contexts.If we consider the distorted yin and yang symbol to represent the discourse ofindigenous sovereignty as the “Multiple Worlds” being dominated by the settler colonists as the“Westphalian Worlds,” we can then also recognize that there are aspects of each within theother. The goal of the walking tour in Waikīkī was to begin talking to diasporic settler youthabout the hegemonic nature of the Westphalian settler state on the indigenous lands of Oʻahuand how our communities have participated in that domination. Yet we should not be afraid toheed indigenous discourses because their message also informs who we are and where we comefrom, knowledge that we might have forgotten, ourselves former subalterns that have beendisciplined, converted, and assimilated into the Westphalian World. Diasporic settlers can heedthe call for indigenous sovereignty by opposing militarization of indigenous lands, not only bypassively listening to indigenous voices, but also by actively engaging in consciousness-raisingamong diasporic settlers, asking them to examine their own relationship to the settler state andhow they operate in and benefit from it. Can knowing the violence of this system on indigenouspeople cause diasporic settlers to make ethical decisions and to interrupt their participation inthe system? Can this project cause diasporic settlers to rethink their own trajectories of successand create new narratives of what it means to settle on someone else’s lands? Will it causesettlers to reflect on their own colonial indoctrination in their host land, and even cause them toexamine indigenous histories in their ancestral homelands?There was no survey at the end of the walking tour to measure its effectiveness inconveying these values to the youth. However, one student who participated in the walking tourlater took part in a poetry slam team comprised of young women of haole (White), Chinese, andBlack-Filipino descent that represented Hawaiʻi in the Brave New Voices 2014 competition.Mentored by a Kanaka ʻŌiwi poet, they performed a piece as non-indigenous Hawaiians,speaking in both English and Hawaiian, about the need to learn Hawaiian history and thefailure of the education system to teach them. The powerful poem expressed their alienationfrom Kanaka ‘Oiwi history, but also an affinity to the indigenous jurisdiction as non-indigenousyouth born and raised in the islands (Gordon et al 2014). Perhaps the call to learn Kanaka ʻŌiwihistory was also a call to reclaim the suppressed history of who they are.ConclusionAnti-colonial and anti-capitalist activists need a language of resistance that can bring indigenousand diasporic settlers together against a failed system of government that continues to produceinequalities and injustice both locally and internationally. Placing attention on the Westphaliannation-state and inter-state system as the name of the unjust settler-colonial system can60
feral <strong>feminisms</strong>Complicities, Connections, & Struggles:Critical Transnational Feminist Analysisof Settler Colonialismissue 4 . summer 2015Reading the Landscape of U.S. SettlerColonialism in Southern OʻahuEllen-Rae Cacholafacilitate an objective focus on a structure of government as the producer of relations ofdominance and submission between social groups in and beyond a defined territory. In Hawai’i,this system is evidenced through the physical, institutional features of hotels and militaryfacilities on the landscape, networked across multiple lands across the Asia-Pacific region underAmerican imperial jurisdiction. As the Hawaiian sovereignty movement has been naming settlercolonialism as an impediment to their sovereignty and access to land, this conversation hascalled upon diasporic settlers to decolonize themselves and their own youth. Diasporic-settlermodes of decolonization are unique to their experience within the settler state as they mustconfront their own indoctrination by the state and trace their own genealogies to indigenoushistories and ancestral lands, to resist and dismantle the legitimacy of the Westphalian systemthat reifies structural violence and displacement today. These moments create a space whereindigenous and diasporic settlers prepare themselves for co-creating a world that departs fromthe Westphalian standard.Notes1. I draw from James Clifford’s notion of diaspora as among the varieties of indigenousexperiences. Diaspora refers to peoples dispersed from their own indigenous lands, whohave extended kin networks outside of their “traditional lands,” and who survive and eventhrive through colonial and postcolonial orders (Clifford 2007).2. I use “diasporic settlers” to refer to the indigeneity that exists within “immigrants” who alsohave heritages of being self-sufficient and close to the land, but may have been distanced oralienated from this knowledge due to processes of colonization and globalization. In thispaper, diasporic settler refers to Filipinos or other immigrants of color that come fromAsian or Pacific Islander countries.3. Ilocano is an ethno-linguistic group from the northwest coast of Luzon, Philippines.Filipino is a catch-all term that reflects the collective of ethno-linguistic groups that are partof the Philippines. Filipino also refers to the national language of the Philippines, which isinformed by Tagalog and other dialects.Works CitedAlthusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatus (Notes Toward An Investigation).” Leninand Philosophy and Other Essays, 1970. Accessed June 10, 2011http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm.Baca, Judy. “A Political Landscape Painter.” 2009. Accessed June 23, 2013.http://www.judybaca.com/artist/a-political-landscape-painter/Cachola, Ellen-Rae, Gwyn Kirk, Lisalinda Natividad, Maria Reinat Pumarejo, “Resistance, Resilienceand Respect for Human Rights: Women Working Across Borders for Peace and GenuineSecurity,” in Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 22 (2010): 164-170.Chan, Gaye and Andrea Freeser. Waikīkī: A History of Forgetting and Remembering. Honolulu:University of Hawaiʻi Press, 2006.Clifford, James. “Varieties of Indigenous Experience: Diasporas, Homelands, Sovereignties.” In61
- Page 1 and 2:
feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 3 and 4:
feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 5 and 6:
feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 7 and 8:
feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 9 and 10: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 11 and 12: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 13 and 14: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 15 and 16: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 17 and 18: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 19 and 20: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 21 and 22: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 23 and 24: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 25 and 26: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 27 and 28: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 29 and 30: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 31 and 32: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 33 and 34: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 35 and 36: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 37 and 38: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 39 and 40: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 41 and 42: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 43 and 44: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 45 and 46: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 47 and 48: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 49 and 50: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 51 and 52: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 53 and 54: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 55 and 56: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 57 and 58: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 59: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 63 and 64: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 65 and 66: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 67 and 68: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 69 and 70: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 71 and 72: Where do I beginmiscegenated into d
- Page 73 and 74: Hybridity & Diasporic WritingCharlo
- Page 75 and 76: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 77 and 78: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 79 and 80: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 81 and 82: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 83 and 84: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 85 and 86: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 87 and 88: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 89 and 90: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 91 and 92: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 93 and 94: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 95 and 96: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 97 and 98: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 99 and 100: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 101 and 102: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec
- Page 103: feral feminismsComplicities, Connec