MILK PRODUCTION

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 2. Milk Yield and milk flow parameters. 576 MILK PRODUCTION *, **, ***, different level of significance P< 0.05, P< 0.01, P < 0.001. Pearson’s coefficients of correlation between teat anatomy and milk flow curves are presented in table 3. Table 3. Pearson’s coefficients of correlation between teat anatomy, and milk flow parameters. *, **, ***, different level of significance P< 0.05, P< 0.01, P < 0.001. Figure 2. Milk flow curve in buffalo with short teat canal length (overall mean 2.14 cm) and similar distribution of milk in the quarters. Proceedings 9 th World Buffalo Congress
MILK PRODUCTION Figure 3. Milk flow curve in buffalo with short teat canal length (overall mean 1.91 cm) and higher maximum flow and average flow. Figure 4. Milk flow curve in buffalo with high teat canal length (overall mean 3.91 cm), and different distribution of milk in quarters. Milk yield in principal milking, maximum flow and average milk flow are negatively correlated with teat diameter and teat wall. Maximum flow, average milk flow and PP were negatively correlated to the length of the “teat canal”, while DP is negatively correlated to the “teat diameter” and positively to the “teat wall”. Unexpectedly, teat length is not significantly correlated with the main parameters of the milk flow curve, probably for the high variability. Under Oxytocin administration, alveolar milk ejection flow trough cisternal cavity finds his limits in low cisternal cavity volume itself 13 . In fact the whole alveolar milk cannot be removed, if a contemporary cisternal milk removal has not been effected. Further limitations in milk ejection finds hits limits in teat anatomy and particularly in teat canal length, which is negatively Buenos Aires, Abril 2010 577
Page 1 and 2: MILK PRODUCTION 06
Page 3 and 4: MILK PRODUCTION Buenos Aires, Abril
Page 5 and 6: MILK PRODUCTION the totally random
Page 7 and 8: SUMMARY MILK PRODUCTION Determinati
Page 9 and 10: MILK PRODUCTION Developmental Chang
Page 11 and 12: MILK PRODUCTION The values obtained
Page 13 and 14: REFERENCES MILK PRODUCTION 1. Agerg
Page 15 and 16: Abstract MILK PRODUCTION Effect of
Page 17 and 18: MILK PRODUCTION There was a decreas
Page 19 and 20: MATERIAL AND METHODS MILK PRODUCTIO
Page 21 and 22: MILK PRODUCTION same purpose in vil
Page 23 and 24: MILK PRODUCTION Table 2. Least-squa
Page 25 and 26: MILK PRODUCTION Implementation of m
Page 27 and 28: MILK PRODUCTION Figure 1. Percentag
Page 29 and 30: MILK PRODUCTION corn silage, either
Page 31 and 32: MILK PRODUCTION Table 1 - Fatty aci
Page 33 and 34: MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND C
Page 35 and 36: SUMMARY MILK PRODUCTION Manufacturi
Page 37 and 38: MILK PRODUCTION Organoleptic, chemi
Page 39 and 40: MILK PRODUCTION Milk flow curve and
Page 41: MILK PRODUCTION Figure 1. Utrasound
Page 45 and 46: MILK PRODUCTION Polynomial function
Page 47 and 48: MILK PRODUCTION The covariance func
Page 49 and 50: MATERIAL AND METHODS MILK PRODUCTIO
Page 51 and 52: MILK PRODUCTION Presence of Somatic
Page 53 and 54: REFERENCES MILK PRODUCTION 1. Aktha
Page 55 and 56: MILK PRODUCTION quarters. Thus, red
Page 57 and 58: MILK PRODUCTION The analysis of var
Page 59 and 60: MILK PRODUCTION from quarters infec
Page 61 and 62: MILK PRODUCTION relations with milk
Page 63 and 64: MILK PRODUCTION trained testers, fr
Page 65 and 66: ight side). MILK PRODUCTION Product
Page 67 and 68: MILK PRODUCTION Successively dyed w
Page 69 and 70: Abstract MILK PRODUCTION Studying t
Page 71 and 72: MILK PRODUCTION Table 1: Distributi
Page 73 and 74: MILK PRODUCTION Effect of herd size

MILK PRODUCTION

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?