MILK PRODUCTION

More documents

Recommendations

Info

REFERENCES 540 MILK PRODUCTION 1.Dubey Pc, Suman C.L, Sanyal M.K. et al. 1997. Factors affecting composition of milk of buffaloes. Ind. J. Anim. Sci., 67(9):802-804. 2. Savu V, Stanescu V, Culea C, et al. 1992. An investigation into so physicochemical characteristics of buffalo milk. Lucrare-Stiitifice, Univ. Stiinte Agronomics, Bucuresti-Seria-C, Medicina-Veterinara. 35(1):131-134. 3.Arumughan, C, Narayanan Km, 1982. Influence of stage of lactation on the physical and chemical characteristics of buffalo milk - fat. Ind. J. Anim. Sci., 52(9):731-735. 4. Sangwan, N, 1988. Changes in physical and chemical characteristics of milk during progression of laction in buffaloes. In: World Buffalo Congress, Nova Dehli. Anais, 276-279. 5. Caldeira, La, Oliveira Js, Santos Ej, Silva Ac, et al., 2008. Caracterização físico-química do leite de búfalas proveniente da região sudoeste da Bahia, Revista Analítica, 37:80-83. 6.Sgarbieri Vc, 2005. Revisão: Propriedades Estruturais e Físico-Químicas das Proteínas do Leite. Braz.J. Food. Technol. 9(2):123-134. Proceedings 9 th World Buffalo Congress
SUMMARY MILK PRODUCTION Determination of on-farm direct cell count and biochemical composition of milk in buffaloes* Hamann 1 , J; Lind 2 , O and Bansal 3 , BK 1 University of Veterinary Medicine, Foundation, D-30173 Hanover, Germany 2 DeLaval International AB, SE-147 21 Tumba, Sweden 3 Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana-141004, India Measure of milk somatic cell count (SCC) with DeLaval cell counter DCC showed usual SCC range in buffalo milk as 200-400 ×10 3 cells/ml. The mean electrical conductivity (EC) at bulk tank milk level was found as 3.58 mS/cm. A significant (p
Page 1 and 2: MILK PRODUCTION 06
Page 3 and 4: MILK PRODUCTION Buenos Aires, Abril
Page 5: MILK PRODUCTION the totally random
Page 9 and 10: MILK PRODUCTION Developmental Chang
Page 11 and 12: MILK PRODUCTION The values obtained
Page 13 and 14: REFERENCES MILK PRODUCTION 1. Agerg
Page 15 and 16: Abstract MILK PRODUCTION Effect of
Page 17 and 18: MILK PRODUCTION There was a decreas
Page 19 and 20: MATERIAL AND METHODS MILK PRODUCTIO
Page 21 and 22: MILK PRODUCTION same purpose in vil
Page 23 and 24: MILK PRODUCTION Table 2. Least-squa
Page 25 and 26: MILK PRODUCTION Implementation of m
Page 27 and 28: MILK PRODUCTION Figure 1. Percentag
Page 29 and 30: MILK PRODUCTION corn silage, either
Page 31 and 32: MILK PRODUCTION Table 1 - Fatty aci
Page 33 and 34: MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND C
Page 35 and 36: SUMMARY MILK PRODUCTION Manufacturi
Page 37 and 38: MILK PRODUCTION Organoleptic, chemi
Page 39 and 40: MILK PRODUCTION Milk flow curve and
Page 41 and 42: MILK PRODUCTION Figure 1. Utrasound
Page 43 and 44: MILK PRODUCTION Figure 3. Milk flow
Page 45 and 46: MILK PRODUCTION Polynomial function
Page 47 and 48: MILK PRODUCTION The covariance func
Page 49 and 50: MATERIAL AND METHODS MILK PRODUCTIO
Page 51 and 52: MILK PRODUCTION Presence of Somatic
Page 53 and 54: REFERENCES MILK PRODUCTION 1. Aktha
Page 55 and 56: MILK PRODUCTION quarters. Thus, red
Page 57 and 58:
MILK PRODUCTION The analysis of var
Page 59 and 60:
MILK PRODUCTION from quarters infec
Page 61 and 62:
MILK PRODUCTION relations with milk
Page 63 and 64:
MILK PRODUCTION trained testers, fr
Page 65 and 66:
ight side). MILK PRODUCTION Product
Page 67 and 68:
MILK PRODUCTION Successively dyed w
Page 69 and 70:
Abstract MILK PRODUCTION Studying t
Page 71 and 72:
MILK PRODUCTION Table 1: Distributi
Page 73 and 74:
MILK PRODUCTION Effect of herd size
show all

MILK PRODUCTION

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?