27.08.2015 Views

Cities Regrowing Smaller – Facing the Challenge of Shrinking Cities

Folie 1 - Cities Regrowing Smaller

Folie 1 - Cities Regrowing Smaller

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Shrinkage in Europe - 16 Feb 2011<br />

<strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong> <strong>–</strong><br />

<strong>Facing</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Challenge</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Shrinking</strong> <strong>Cities</strong><br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann, TU Dortmund<br />

Chair <strong>of</strong> COST Action TU 0803 »<strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong>«<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 1


Shrinkage in Europe - 16 Feb 2011<br />

<strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong> (CIRES) <strong>–</strong> COST Action TU0803<br />

Fostering Knowledge on Regeneration Strategies in <strong>Shrinking</strong> <strong>Cities</strong> across Europe<br />

www.shrinkingcities.eu<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 2


Shrinkage in Europe - 16 Feb 2011<br />

1 Introduction: unresolved issues <strong>of</strong> shrinking cities<br />

2 Eight Selected Cases: grounding <strong>the</strong> debate<br />

3 Lessons drawn from <strong>the</strong> cases<br />

4 Concluding remarks<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 3


1 Introduction<br />

<strong>Shrinking</strong> <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>–</strong> selected unresolved issues<br />

• The state <strong>of</strong> knowledge: causes, patterns, and effects<br />

• The political dimension: <strong>the</strong> significance <strong>of</strong> shrinkage<br />

• The responses <strong>of</strong> planners: promising strategies to deal with shrinkage<br />

Four lines <strong>of</strong> argument<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Still, we know little about <strong>the</strong> extension and spreading <strong>of</strong> urban<br />

shrinkage; in particular we lack a cross-national comparative<br />

perspective. Validity and comparability <strong>of</strong> existing data is questionable.<br />

<strong>Shrinking</strong> <strong>Cities</strong> as such are not new, but <strong>the</strong> long term influence <strong>of</strong> low<br />

fertility rates demands for a change <strong>of</strong> perspective and a distinction<br />

between demographic decrease and economic decline.<br />

In shrinking cities planning practice is ahead <strong>of</strong> planning research.<br />

We need to transform planning <strong>of</strong> shrinkage into <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> shrinkage.<br />

Planning is traditionally growth oriented. Planning for shrinkage<br />

demands a paradigm change <strong>–</strong> IOW: is thrown into a state <strong>of</strong> crisis<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 4


2 Eight Selected Cases: The object <strong>of</strong> study<br />

Dessau<br />

• Regional center in Saxony-Anhalt<br />

• Population losses (-28%) since 1989<br />

due to out-migration and low birth rates<br />

• Demolition <strong>of</strong> housing blocks with state support<br />

• IBA Urban Redevelopment 2010: Urban Core Areas <strong>–</strong> Landscape Zones<br />

120000<br />

110000<br />

100000<br />

90000<br />

80000<br />

70000<br />

60000<br />

50000<br />

Source: IBA Urban Redevelopment 2010<br />

Source: Wiechmann<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 5


2 Eight Selected Cases: The object <strong>of</strong> study<br />

Leipzig<br />

• Major city in Saxony<br />

• Long term shrinkage 1965 <strong>–</strong> 2000 (-39%)<br />

due to out-migration and low birth rates<br />

• Since 2000 new growth due to a positive migratory balance and trends<br />

towards reurbanization<br />

• Early restructuring programs by <strong>the</strong> city planning department<br />

650.000<br />

630.000<br />

610.000<br />

590.000<br />

570.000<br />

550.000<br />

530.000<br />

510.000<br />

490.000<br />

470.000<br />

450.000<br />

Stadthäuser <strong>–</strong><br />

New Townhouses<br />

Source: Stadt Leipzig<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 6


2 Eight Selected Cases: The object <strong>of</strong> study<br />

Duisburg<br />

• Major city in <strong>the</strong> Ruhr Area<br />

• Long term shrinkage since 1961 (-26%)<br />

due to economic decline (heavy industries)<br />

• Temporary growth in early 1990ies<br />

650.000<br />

630.000<br />

610.000<br />

590.000<br />

570.000<br />

550.000<br />

530.000<br />

510.000<br />

490.000<br />

470.000<br />

450.000<br />

• Large distressed neighborhoods in proximity to industrial areas (north)<br />

• New developments at <strong>the</strong> inland harbor and on green fields (south)<br />

Duisburg-Bruckhausen: Housing Area with<br />

high vacancy rate <strong>–</strong> future green belt<br />

Source: Stadt Duisburg<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 7


2 Eight Selected Cases: The object <strong>of</strong> study<br />

Taranto<br />

• Industrial city in Apulia<br />

• Population decrease since 1980 (-21%)<br />

due to low fertility and out-migration<br />

• Steel and iron foundries, oil refineries, chemical plants, commercial and<br />

military ports <strong>–</strong> number <strong>of</strong> jobs declined<br />

• „High environmental risk area” - most polluted city in western Europe<br />

(carbon monoxide, dioxin, etc.)<br />

250.000<br />

240.000<br />

230.000<br />

220.000<br />

210.000<br />

200.000<br />

190.000<br />

180.000<br />

170.000<br />

160.000<br />

150.000<br />

Taranto: Urban structure<br />

Urban regeneration projects:<br />

• Tamburi quarter (78 m € + 46 m €)<br />

• Salinella quarter (13 m €)<br />

• Città Vecchia (6,2 m €)<br />

• Zona Franca Urbana<br />

(Urban free zone with tax incentives)<br />

Source: Wiechmann<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 8


2 Eight Selected Cases: The object <strong>of</strong> study<br />

Porto<br />

• Major city in nor<strong>the</strong>rn Portugal<br />

• Population decrease <strong>of</strong> <strong>–</strong>30% since 1991<br />

due to metropolitan decentralization <strong>of</strong><br />

housing and industries as well as low fertility rates<br />

• Historic center (UNESCO world heritage) with high vacancies, many<br />

houses in poor condition<br />

• SRU Master Plan and Historic Center Management Plan seek for <strong>the</strong><br />

re-population <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> historic center<br />

350000<br />

330000<br />

310000<br />

290000<br />

270000<br />

250000<br />

230000<br />

210000<br />

190000<br />

170000<br />

150000<br />

Source: Wiechmann<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 9


2 Eight Selected Cases: The object <strong>of</strong> study<br />

Youngstown, Ohio<br />

• US rust belt city and traditional center <strong>of</strong><br />

steel production<br />

• Population decrease since <strong>the</strong> 1960ies (<strong>–</strong>56%)<br />

due to <strong>the</strong> decline <strong>of</strong> U.S. steel industry<br />

• The city was forced to redefine itself<br />

150.000<br />

140.000<br />

130.000<br />

120.000<br />

110.000<br />

100.000<br />

90.000<br />

80.000<br />

70.000<br />

60.000<br />

50.000<br />

• Problem: maintaining a largely oversized infrastructure<br />

„Youngstown 2010” (in 2005):<br />

• Vision: accepting shrinkage<br />

• <strong>Smaller</strong> city, new economy,<br />

improved image and quality <strong>of</strong> life<br />

• Youngstown has spent $5.3 million<br />

to implement <strong>the</strong> plan:<br />

2,000 houses were razed,<br />

five bridges refurbished, and<br />

seven brownfield sites remediated<br />

Source: Wiechmann / Pallagst (2009)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 10


2 Eight Selected Cases: The object <strong>of</strong> study<br />

190.000<br />

Flint, Michigan<br />

• Birthplace <strong>of</strong> General Motors and symbol <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> collapse <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> US auto industry<br />

• Strongest population decline in large U.S. cities;<br />

since 1960 <strong>the</strong> city lost 43% <strong>of</strong> its population<br />

• Neighborhoods along <strong>the</strong> former industrial sites<br />

show vacancy rates above 50%<br />

• High socioeconomic<br />

and racial segregation<br />

170.000<br />

150.000<br />

130.000<br />

110.000<br />

90.000<br />

70.000<br />

50.000<br />

Source: Volkmann<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 11


2 Eight Selected Cases: The object <strong>of</strong> study<br />

Toyama<br />

• Major city on <strong>the</strong> north coast <strong>of</strong> Honshu;<br />

center <strong>of</strong> pharmaceutical industry, IT and<br />

biotechnology industry<br />

• Population decrease in prefecture stronger<br />

than in <strong>the</strong> city; -2% since 1985<br />

• Predominantly due to declining birthrates<br />

• 2005, six neighboring towns incorporated<br />

500000<br />

480000<br />

460000<br />

440000<br />

420000<br />

400000<br />

380000<br />

360000<br />

340000<br />

320000<br />

300000<br />

Revitalization Master Plan (2007):<br />

• Vision: revitalization without<br />

population growth<br />

• „Stick and Dumplings”<br />

Toyama 1972 2010<br />

• Three priorities:<br />

- Promotion <strong>of</strong> Inner-city Residence<br />

- (Re-)creation <strong>of</strong> Commercial Core<br />

- Improving Public Transportation<br />

Source: Seta 2009<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 12


3 Lessons<br />

What did <strong>the</strong>se eight cases have in common?<br />

• All cities lost residents; population decrease started already in <strong>the</strong> 20 th<br />

century (between 1960 and 1990)<br />

• All cities have an ageing population<br />

• All cities show housing vacancy rates above <strong>the</strong> fluctuation reserve<br />

• All cities face a deteriorating financial basis<br />

• All cities have troubles to maintain <strong>the</strong> oversized infrastructure<br />

• All cities struggled to accept shrinkage<br />

What are major differences between <strong>the</strong>se eight cases?<br />

• The causes <strong>of</strong> population decrease are different: economic decline, outmigration,<br />

low fertility rates, suburbanization, decentralization,<br />

environmental pollution, etc.<br />

• Extend and spatial pattern <strong>of</strong> vacancies differ<br />

• Some cities face long term economic decline while o<strong>the</strong>rs are<br />

economically competitive<br />

• Some cities deliberately plan for a smaller city (Dessau, Youngstown,<br />

Toyama) where as o<strong>the</strong>r still aim for demographic growth (Porto,<br />

Taranto, Duisburg)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 13


Population Change<br />

3 Lessons<br />

‚<strong>Shrinking</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>’: irreversible decline or a cyclical phenomenon?<br />

Core<br />

Agglomeration<br />

Hinterland<br />

Subphases<br />

Phases<br />

Urbanization Cycle according to Leo van den Berg 1982<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 14


3 Lessons<br />

(Demographic) Shrinkage ≠ Cyclical Phenomenon !<br />

(Demographic) Shrinkage ≠ (Economic) Decline !<br />

• Population decrease may be caused by suburbanization<br />

• Population decrease may be caused by out-migration <strong>of</strong><br />

young job seeking residents<br />

• However, in large parts <strong>of</strong> Europe and East Asia <strong>the</strong><br />

demographic transition is <strong>–</strong> in <strong>the</strong> long run <strong>–</strong> <strong>the</strong> main driver<br />

• The second demographic transition (Lesthaeghe / Kaa 1986)<br />

• began in <strong>the</strong> mid-1960s and accelerated during <strong>the</strong> 1980s.<br />

• marked by declining rates <strong>of</strong> married couples, rising divorce rates, an<br />

increasing age <strong>of</strong> marriage, a severely falling fertility, and <strong>the</strong><br />

substitution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> child with <strong>the</strong> couple as <strong>the</strong> main family element.<br />

• Since <strong>the</strong> 1970s as <strong>the</strong> pill took effect birth rates declined far below<br />

<strong>the</strong> replacement level <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population.<br />

• The <strong>the</strong>ory describes <strong>the</strong> uncoupling <strong>of</strong> economic wealth and<br />

population growth.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 15


3 Lessons<br />

The issue <strong>of</strong> defining <strong>the</strong> term ‚<strong>Shrinking</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>’<br />

Though <strong>the</strong> academic debate on shrinking cities is still in its infancy we find a<br />

multitude <strong>of</strong> definitions (see Avila de Sousa 2010):<br />

• Consensus on <strong>the</strong> demographic characteristic: decreasing population<br />

• Quantitative aspect differs widely (with regard to applicable threshold as<br />

well as whe<strong>the</strong>r relative shrinkage is included)<br />

• No consensus if <strong>the</strong> definition should comprise o<strong>the</strong>r aspects <strong>of</strong> a structural<br />

and multidimensional phenomenon<br />

In <strong>the</strong> COST Action a ‚shrinking city’ is defined as …<br />

• a densely populated urban area with a minimum population <strong>of</strong> 5,000<br />

residents<br />

• that has faced a population loss in large parts <strong>of</strong> it<br />

• for more than 2 years and<br />

• is undergoing transformations with some symptoms <strong>of</strong> a structural crisis.<br />

Based on: SCiRN 2005<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 16


3 Lessons<br />

Typologies ‚<strong>Shrinking</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>’<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> few so far proposed typologies so far are based on causes<br />

Suburbanisation<br />

Industrial<br />

Transformation<br />

Selective<br />

Collapses<br />

Politcal<br />

Strategies<br />

Hollowing Out,<br />

'Doghnut'<br />

Sprawl<br />

Old Industrial Areas<br />

Rust Belts<br />

(Steel, Coal)<br />

Economical<br />

Oil crisis<br />

Dot-com Hype<br />

Abandonment <strong>of</strong><br />

Mining Areas<br />

Controlled<br />

(Re)Settlements<br />

Depopulation Areas<br />

Segregation<br />

…<br />

Harbours, Dockyards<br />

Textile Industries<br />

Environmental<br />

(Natural) Disaster<br />

Pollution<br />

Epidemics<br />

Former controlled<br />

Colonisation Areas<br />

…<br />

…<br />

Political<br />

Banishment<br />

War<br />

Famine<br />

…<br />

Wiechmann 2006<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 17


3 Lessons<br />

Typologies ‚<strong>Shrinking</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>’<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> few so far proposed typologies so far are based on causes<br />

Type Characteristics Underlying Causes Selected Contemporary Examples Policy Implications (examples)<br />

Shrinkage is Imposed<br />

Conflicts/war<br />

Political and military conflicts<br />

Beirut, Lebanon; Phnom Penh<br />

Conflict resolution<br />

Political or economic reforms<br />

Depletion <strong>of</strong> resources<br />

Spatial/Administrative Reforms —<br />

national govt.<br />

Uneconomic exploitation <strong>of</strong> natural<br />

resources<br />

Chinese county towns & villages<br />

Nauru & o<strong>the</strong>r mining cities—<br />

including resource towns<br />

Modification <strong>of</strong> administrative<br />

reforms<br />

New technology; Efficient<br />

methods <strong>of</strong> resource extraction<br />

Shrinkage due to<br />

comparative<br />

disadvantages<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

opportunities/diversity<br />

Lifestyle attractions<br />

Climatic conditions<br />

Infrastructure provisions<br />

Core/periphery drift Globalization<br />

De-industrialization<br />

Re-industrialization<br />

(rise <strong>of</strong> Regional inequalities;<br />

Knowledge economy)<br />

Climatic differences<br />

Metropolitan lifestyle<br />

Poland relative to EU<br />

S. Korea -- regions outside <strong>of</strong> Seoul<br />

Metro region<br />

France (non metro Paris)<br />

Scotland<br />

NE China old industrial centers<br />

Rust belt (USA)<br />

Reinforce regional resilience<br />

Ensure embeddedness <strong>of</strong><br />

economic activities<br />

Regional decentralization policies<br />

Shrinkage due to societal /<br />

global changes<br />

Absolute decline <strong>of</strong> population<br />

Ageing population<br />

Climate change<br />

Low birth rate (fertility decline)<br />

Low population replacement rate<br />

Population structure “Demographic<br />

onus”<br />

Dresden, Germany<br />

Kyoto, Japan<br />

Australian outback towns<br />

Population policy<br />

Urban amenities/infrastructures<br />

investments<br />

Global climate policies/programs<br />

Global climate changes<br />

Source: Wu et al. 2008<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 18


3 Lessons<br />

Typologies ‚<strong>Shrinking</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>’<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> few so far proposed typologies are based on causes<br />

With regard to Europe, causal typologies focus on three development paths:<br />

• Suburbanization<br />

• „hollowing out”, flight <strong>of</strong> people and jobs, urban sprawl<br />

• decentralization<br />

• Economic Restructuring<br />

• shift away from industrial-based economy<br />

• old industrialized rust-belts<br />

• peripheral rural areas and small towns<br />

• Demographics<br />

• low fertility rates; negative natural population development<br />

• immigrant settlement patterns: tendency <strong>of</strong> immigrants to settle in<br />

larger, growing cities<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 19


3 Lessons<br />

Typologies ‚<strong>Shrinking</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>’<br />

Only recently, cluster analyses aim at classifying shrinking cities:<br />

• Germany<br />

• Bertelsmann Foundation, 2005 ff.<br />

• 2,971 municipalities (> 5,000 res.); 220 indicators<br />

• information system for local and regional stakeholder<br />

• 15 clusters on municipality level (n=2,971)<br />

• Portugal<br />

• Silvia Avila de Sousa, 2010<br />

• 3 levels: cities, municipalities, extended regions; 33 indicators<br />

• 3 clusters on city level (n=21)<br />

• France<br />

• Manuel Wolff, 2011<br />

• 354 Aire Urbaine, 14 indicators<br />

• 5 clusters on FUA level (n=354)<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 20


3 Lessons<br />

Availability and validity <strong>of</strong> data on ‚<strong>Shrinking</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>’<br />

What kind <strong>of</strong> data would be needed?<br />

• Population development in urban areas<br />

births, deaths, migration, …<br />

• Socio-economic transformations<br />

vacancy rates, land use changes, GDP, employment, income …<br />

time series on small scale!<br />

comparative statistics (interregional and international)<br />

Source: Wiechmann / Wolff 2010<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 21


Source: Wolff 2009<br />

3 Lessons<br />

Availability and validity <strong>of</strong> data on ‚<strong>Shrinking</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>’<br />

What kind <strong>of</strong> data is available in Europe? (see Wolff 2011)<br />

• Eurostat<br />

• NUTS 1, 2, 3 regional scale not adequate to analyze cities<br />

• LAU 1, 2 low comparability and validity<br />

• Urban Audit with 357 (larger) cities not up-to-date, large gaps,<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> metadata<br />

• National statistics<br />

• different standards, methods, and variables<br />

• heterogeneous time-reference <strong>of</strong> existing data<br />

• different operationalization <strong>of</strong> ‚cities’<br />

• different thresholds<br />

• in some countries poor availability <strong>of</strong> socio-economic data<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 22


Source: Wiechmann 2003<br />

3 Lessons<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> instruments to deal with ‚<strong>Shrinking</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>’<br />

Planning shrinkage - <strong>the</strong> new challenge<br />

• Traditional planning is based on growth expectations<br />

• There is a necessity to realign <strong>the</strong> planning system<br />

• Contracting processes are complex, difficult and ‚politically indigestible’<br />

Traditional ‘Growth Planning’<br />

• Objective: Growth<br />

• Prior Task: to reduce shortcomings by<br />

new <strong>of</strong>fers, to canalise investments<br />

• Governance by physical plans<br />

• Orientation on new construction sites and<br />

new buildings<br />

• Clear, binding guidelines (e.g. type and<br />

extend <strong>of</strong> use)<br />

• Spatial separation <strong>of</strong> housing, work,<br />

shopping and recreation<br />

• Local planning autonomy<br />

Sustainable ‘Stock Development’<br />

• Objective: Revision, stabilisation and<br />

maintenance <strong>of</strong> regeneration capacity<br />

• Prior Task: to reduce shortcomings in<br />

existing structures, prevent disinvestment<br />

• Process support (guidance, moderation)<br />

• Orientation on <strong>the</strong> reutilization <strong>of</strong> buildings<br />

and creative demolition<br />

• Alternative development opportunities,<br />

multifunctional architecture<br />

• Efficient support funds through strategic<br />

frameworks and cross-sectoral solutions<br />

• Intermunicipal co-operation<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 23


3 Lessons<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> instruments to deal with ‚<strong>Shrinking</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>’<br />

Youngstown 2010:<br />

Accepting Shrinkage<br />

Leipzig: Conceptual District Plans<br />

Dessau:<br />

Urban Core Areas <strong>–</strong><br />

Landscape Zones<br />

Toyama: Master plan<br />

Revitalization without growth<br />

Flint: Landbank<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 24


4 Concluding remarks<br />

‚<strong>Shrinking</strong> <strong>Cities</strong>’: <strong>Facing</strong> <strong>the</strong> challenge<br />

Do you see <strong>the</strong> dancer as spinning clockwise or counterclockwise?<br />

It just depends on how YOU see it !<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dr. Thorsten Wiechmann <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Regrowing</strong> <strong>Smaller</strong><br />

16.02.2011<br />

Page 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!