PRIORITIES FOR EU MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY DESIGN
priorities for eu motor vehicle safety design - ETSC
priorities for eu motor vehicle safety design - ETSC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 3: Collision Direction – fatally injured casualties –UK and German data.<br />
Other 16%<br />
Roll 4%<br />
Rear 3%<br />
Front 36%<br />
Side 39%<br />
UK data<br />
Rear 1% Roll 1%<br />
Front 48%<br />
Side 48%<br />
German data<br />
The data highlight the importance of fatal side impacts (39% UK Co-operative Crash Injury<br />
and 48% Medical University of Hannover), which marginally exceed the total fatalities in<br />
frontal collisions. The nature of the collision partner, figure 4, shows some differences<br />
between the two countries, 41% of UK fatalities die in collisions with other cars compared<br />
with only 25% in Germany. In contrast 50% of German fatalities die in collision with poles or<br />
trees compared to only 12% in the UK.<br />
Analysis of the injuries reveals that life threatening injuries are most commonly sustained by<br />
the head and chest in pole impacts and other side collisions. The protection of these body<br />
regions is a priority in injury reduction.<br />
15