Instrumental Calibration, Standards, Quantitative Analysis, and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

WU JXA-8200 CMASTF Data Set All WDS Data Superimposed K meas / K calc 1.20 1.10 1.00 0.90 0.80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Oxide Weight Percent Mg1 TAP Mg2 TAP Al1 TAP AL2 TAP Si1 PET Si1 TAP Si2 TAP Si3 PET Si4 PET Si5 PETH Ca1 PET Ca3 PET Ca4 PET Ca5 PETH Ca3 LIF Ca4 LIF Ca5 LIFH Ti1 PET Ti3 PET Ti4 PET Ti5 PETH Ti3 LIF Ti4 LIF Ti5 LIFH Fe3 LIF Fe4 LIF Fe5 LIFH UO EPMA Workshop 2008
WU JXA-8200 CMASTF Data Set Spectrometer 1 PET <strong>and</strong> TAP 1.20 1.10 K meas / K calc 1.00 Mg1 TAP Al1 TAP Si1 PET Si1 TAP Ca1 PET Ti1 PET 0.90 0.80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Oxide Weight Percent UO EPMA Workshop 2008
Page 1 and 2: Electron-Probe Microanalysis: Instr
Page 3 and 4: Washington University, Saint Louis
Page 5 and 6: Pulse-Height Analysis Wavelength-di
Page 7 and 8: Detector Bias Scan Si Kα Vary Bias
Page 9 and 10: Calibration of PHA Using Bias vs. l
Page 11 and 12: Gain Shift Due to Count Rate 5K cps
Page 13 and 14: Carbon Kα PHA Scans Graphite, Fe3C
Page 15 and 16: WDS Deadtime Issues in EPMA • Dea
Page 17 and 18: Deadtime Losses Input - Output Curv
Page 19 and 20: Deadtime Relations Calculation of D
Page 21 and 22: Verification of Probe Current vs. A
Page 23 and 24: Deadtime Variation with Count Rate
Page 25 and 26: Alignment and Quantitative Analysis
Page 27 and 28: Electron Microprobe Column Spectrom
Page 29 and 30: CMASTF Standard Inventory: Natural
Page 31 and 32: Ag Lα NIST SRM 481 AgAu Alloy (ψ=
Page 33 and 34: Historical CMAS Data Caltech MAC Pr
Page 35 and 36: Caltech JEOL 733 1990’s Spectrome
Page 37 and 38: Caltech JEOL 733 1990’s Spectrome
Page 39: Intercomparison of Measured vs. Acc
Page 43 and 44: WU JXA-8200 CMASTF Data Set Spectro
Page 45 and 46: WU JXA-8200 CMASTF Data Set Spectro
Page 47 and 48: Accuracy, 1σ % Error in K meas / K
Page 49 and 50: Washington University Earth and Pla
Page 51 and 52: Lunar Meteorite SAU169 Stage map 10
Page 53 and 54: WU8200 JEOL SDD 55 Fe Source Mn Kα
Page 55 and 56: SDD Performance Data: WU8200 SDD Mn
Page 57 and 58: WU8200 SDD Mn K Spectra T1, 100 sec
Page 59 and 60: WU8200 SDD Mn L Spectra T1, 100 sec
Page 61 and 62: WU8200 SDD Deadtime vs. Count Rate
Page 63 and 64: WU8200 SDD Count Rate vs. Resolutio
Page 65 and 66: Washington University JXA-8200 SDD
Page 67 and 68: CMASTF Standard Analyses WU8200 SDD
Page 69 and 70: CMASTF Standard Analyses WU8200 SDD
Page 71 and 72: EPMA Standards UO EPMA Workshop 200
Page 73 and 74: Basalt Glass Indian Ocean USNM 1137
Page 75 and 76: Olivine Standards: Mn, Fe, Ni Stand
Page 77 and 78: Fayalite Standards Oxide MnO FeO* N
Page 79 and 80: Systematic Error Using Oxide Standa
Page 81 and 82: Accuracy of EPMA: Quantitative Anal
Page 83 and 84: Olivine Alpha Factor Study: Compari
Page 85 and 86: Analysis of Mg Kα in Shankland For
Page 87 and 88: Mg Kα in Olivine Using Forsterite
Page 89 and 90: EPMA of San Carlos Olivine Correcti
Page 91 and 92:
Inconel Spheres: Diameter ~ 30 um U
Page 93 and 94:
Inconel Sphere Low Energy EDS Regio
Page 95 and 96:
Al Kα Peak Intensity at -10º to +
Page 97 and 98:
Problem Systems UO EPMA Workshop 20
Page 99 and 100:
WDS Background Selection (Natural P
Page 101 and 102:
WDS Scan LIF: Al, Cr, Ni, and NiCrA
Page 103 and 104:
Zn Kα ΙΙ V Kα Ce Lα La Lα Ti
Page 105 and 106:
WDS Scan: PET Crystal 95IRV Green,
Page 107 and 108:
WDS Scan: PET Crystal Sr Lα Peaks,
Page 109 and 110:
Elevated and Uncertain MAC Values f
Page 111 and 112:
Mass Absorption Coefficients for Si
Page 113 and 114:
Silicon Kα MAC at L-edge of Absorb
Page 115 and 116:
Error Analysis Ta Lα in TaSi 2 All
Page 117 and 118:
Calculated Compositions of TaSi2 Re
show all

Instrumental Calibration, Standards, Quantitative Analysis, and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?