- Page 1 and 2: Electron-Probe Microanalysis: Instr
- Page 3 and 4: Washington University, Saint Louis
- Page 5 and 6: Pulse-Height Analysis Wavelength-di
- Page 7: Detector Bias Scan Si Kα Vary Bias
- Page 11 and 12: Gain Shift Due to Count Rate 5K cps
- Page 13 and 14: Carbon Kα PHA Scans Graphite, Fe3C
- Page 15 and 16: WDS Deadtime Issues in EPMA • Dea
- Page 17 and 18: Deadtime Losses Input - Output Curv
- Page 19 and 20: Deadtime Relations Calculation of D
- Page 21 and 22: Verification of Probe Current vs. A
- Page 23 and 24: Deadtime Variation with Count Rate
- Page 25 and 26: Alignment and Quantitative Analysis
- Page 27 and 28: Electron Microprobe Column Spectrom
- Page 29 and 30: CMASTF Standard Inventory: Natural
- Page 31 and 32: Ag Lα NIST SRM 481 AgAu Alloy (ψ=
- Page 33 and 34: Historical CMAS Data Caltech MAC Pr
- Page 35 and 36: Caltech JEOL 733 1990’s Spectrome
- Page 37 and 38: Caltech JEOL 733 1990’s Spectrome
- Page 39 and 40: Intercomparison of Measured vs. Acc
- Page 41 and 42: WU JXA-8200 CMASTF Data Set Spectro
- Page 43 and 44: WU JXA-8200 CMASTF Data Set Spectro
- Page 45 and 46: WU JXA-8200 CMASTF Data Set Spectro
- Page 47 and 48: Accuracy, 1σ % Error in K meas / K
- Page 49 and 50: Washington University Earth and Pla
- Page 51 and 52: Lunar Meteorite SAU169 Stage map 10
- Page 53 and 54: WU8200 JEOL SDD 55 Fe Source Mn Kα
- Page 55 and 56: SDD Performance Data: WU8200 SDD Mn
- Page 57 and 58: WU8200 SDD Mn K Spectra T1, 100 sec
- Page 59 and 60:
WU8200 SDD Mn L Spectra T1, 100 sec
- Page 61 and 62:
WU8200 SDD Deadtime vs. Count Rate
- Page 63 and 64:
WU8200 SDD Count Rate vs. Resolutio
- Page 65 and 66:
Washington University JXA-8200 SDD
- Page 67 and 68:
CMASTF Standard Analyses WU8200 SDD
- Page 69 and 70:
CMASTF Standard Analyses WU8200 SDD
- Page 71 and 72:
EPMA Standards UO EPMA Workshop 200
- Page 73 and 74:
Basalt Glass Indian Ocean USNM 1137
- Page 75 and 76:
Olivine Standards: Mn, Fe, Ni Stand
- Page 77 and 78:
Fayalite Standards Oxide MnO FeO* N
- Page 79 and 80:
Systematic Error Using Oxide Standa
- Page 81 and 82:
Accuracy of EPMA: Quantitative Anal
- Page 83 and 84:
Olivine Alpha Factor Study: Compari
- Page 85 and 86:
Analysis of Mg Kα in Shankland For
- Page 87 and 88:
Mg Kα in Olivine Using Forsterite
- Page 89 and 90:
EPMA of San Carlos Olivine Correcti
- Page 91 and 92:
Inconel Spheres: Diameter ~ 30 um U
- Page 93 and 94:
Inconel Sphere Low Energy EDS Regio
- Page 95 and 96:
Al Kα Peak Intensity at -10º to +
- Page 97 and 98:
Problem Systems UO EPMA Workshop 20
- Page 99 and 100:
WDS Background Selection (Natural P
- Page 101 and 102:
WDS Scan LIF: Al, Cr, Ni, and NiCrA
- Page 103 and 104:
Zn Kα ΙΙ V Kα Ce Lα La Lα Ti
- Page 105 and 106:
WDS Scan: PET Crystal 95IRV Green,
- Page 107 and 108:
WDS Scan: PET Crystal Sr Lα Peaks,
- Page 109 and 110:
Elevated and Uncertain MAC Values f
- Page 111 and 112:
Mass Absorption Coefficients for Si
- Page 113 and 114:
Silicon Kα MAC at L-edge of Absorb
- Page 115 and 116:
Error Analysis Ta Lα in TaSi 2 All
- Page 117 and 118:
Calculated Compositions of TaSi2 Re