Technologies to Reduce or Capture and Store Carbon Dioxide Emissions

Recommendations

Info

The National Coal Council Georgia Nelson Chair Robert A. Beck Executive Director U.S. Department of Energy Samuel W. Bodman Secretary of Energy The National Coal Council is a Federal Advisory Committee to the Secretary of Energy. The sole purpose of The National Coal Council is to advise, inform, and make recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on any matter requested by the Secretary relating to coal or the coal industry.
Page 1 and 2: Technologies to Reduce or Capture a
Page 3: Technologies to Reduce or Capture a
Page 12 and 13: the national coal council Technolog
Page 14 and 15: 02 executive summary Technology-Bas
Page 16 and 17: 04 executive summary Figure ES-2 Ne
Page 18 and 19: 06 executive summary FutureGen Proj
Page 20 and 21: 08 executive summary Report, this c
Page 22 and 23: 10 executive summary » The U.S. ge
Page 24 and 25: 12 executive summary Key research a
Page 26 and 27: 14 executive summary o Significant
Page 28 and 29: 16 NCC RECOMMENDATIONS o Increase f
Page 30: the national coal council The Natio
Page 33 and 34: SECTION ONE World Energy and Greenh
Page 35 and 36: 800.0 700.0 13% Other Quadrillion B
Page 37 and 38: In China, for example, a major anal
Page 39 and 40: • Oil depletion rates. Oil wells,
Page 41 and 42: Additional Coal Requirements to Mee
Page 43 and 44: The EIA projects that world energy-
Page 45 and 46: 35.0 12.0 30.0 10.0 Trillion Dollar
Page 47 and 48: Progress on Reducing Carbon Emissio
Page 49 and 50: References 1 North American Electri
Page 51 and 52: technologies for reducing and avoid
Page 53 and 54: Supercritical steam plants have bee
Page 55 and 56:
Ultra-Supercritical Steam PC Ultra-
Page 57 and 58:
As advanced materials are proven an
Page 59 and 60:
Figure 2-8. Circulating Fluidized B
Page 61 and 62:
EPRI Coal Fleet for Tomorrow IGCC A
Page 63 and 64:
Improving Efficiency of IGCC - 2010
Page 65 and 66:
Improving the Efficiency of Existin
Page 67 and 68:
elated costs is essentially linear
Page 69 and 70:
References 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Page 71 and 72:
een initiated on a broad front. Thi
Page 73 and 74:
necessary to release the captured C
Page 75 and 76:
Terminology Permeation, in physics,
Page 77 and 78:
Technologies Readying for Pilot Sca
Page 79 and 80:
promises greater chemical and therm
Page 81 and 82:
SaskPower Project During the next 2
Page 83 and 84:
To maintain the required temperatur
Page 85 and 86:
various concepts for CO 2 compressi
Page 87 and 88:
SECTION FOUR Carbon Management for
Page 89 and 90:
producing nations worldwide. Compet
Page 91 and 92:
Hybrid Coal Liquefaction (DCL/ICL)
Page 93 and 94:
plants theoretically can be designe
Page 95 and 96:
Commercial Status DCL was developed
Page 97 and 98:
Grams of CO 2 -equivalent Emissions
Page 99 and 100:
CONCLUSIONS • Coal to products (C
Page 101 and 102:
SECTION FIVE Carbon Dioxide Capture
Page 103 and 104:
Figure 5-1: Illustration showing se
Page 105 and 106:
current activities such as natural
Page 107 and 108:
Northern Great Plains Gasification
Page 109 and 110:
geometrics, density inversion and m
Page 111 and 112:
Figure 5-7: Schematic layout of CON
Page 113 and 114:
typically compressed to 2175 psi (1
Page 115 and 116:
Cost ($/t CO2/100km) 4.00 3.50 3.00
Page 117 and 118:
sequestration involves storing carb
Page 119 and 120:
incentives to adopt a wide range of
Page 121 and 122:
High-pressure injection of gas into
Page 123 and 124:
CONCLUSIONS Progress in geological
Page 125 and 126:
References 45 46 Intergovernmental
Page 127 and 128:
SECTION SIX Technology Profiles and
Page 129 and 130:
the desired technologies will advan
Page 131 and 132:
Insights from a Historical Review o
Page 133 and 134:
is vulnerable to interdependent ris
Page 135 and 136:
IGCC with carbon capture shows an a
Page 137 and 138:
IGCC Pre-Investment Options for Lat
Page 139 and 140:
Comparative Studies with and withou
Page 141 and 142:
CPS Energy Study - IGCC versus PC f
Page 143 and 144:
Figure 6-9: COE for IGCC and PC Usi
Page 145 and 146:
efficiency gains, not through capit
Page 147 and 148:
Comparison of Baseline Technologies
Page 149 and 150:
Stakeholder Roles in Advanced Coal
Page 151 and 152:
References 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83
Page 153 and 154:
almost 80 percent of DOE’s FY2008
Page 155 and 156:
The RCSPs’ work was conceived by
Page 157 and 158:
The CCPI program also includes two
Page 159 and 160:
Technical Goals: The FutureGen goal
Page 161 and 162:
To foster creation and development
Page 163 and 164:
develop tools and protocols necessa
Page 165 and 166:
The ministerial meeting established
Page 167 and 168:
Power Systems, Pre-Combustion Decar
Page 169 and 170:
Resources 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 1
Page 171 and 172:
• Part One, a $500 million, five-
Page 173 and 174:
APPENDICES 1. Description of The Na
Page 175 and 176:
APPENDIX 2 The National Coal Counci
Page 177 and 178:
John Dwyer Lignite Energy Council 1
Page 179 and 180:
Michael W. McLanahan McLanahan Corp
Page 181 and 182:
William B. Schafer NexGen Resources
Page 183 and 184:
APPENDIX 3 Coal Policy Committee Ro
Page 185 and 186:
Robert M. Purgert Energy Industries
Page 187 and 188:
Bill DePriest Sargent & Lundy Ph: 3
Page 189 and 190:
Bob Smith University of Idaho Ph: 2
Page 191 and 192:
Appendix 6 Abbreviations AC AMP AGR
show all

Technologies to Reduce or Capture and Store Carbon Dioxide Emissions

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?