14.10.2015 Views

CITIZENS

TnqFN

TnqFN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

020 7738 2348<br />

Arts & Culture<br />

October 2015<br />

Kensington, Chelsea & Westminster Today 53<br />

online: www.KCWToday.co.uk<br />

BRICKS AND<br />

BRICKBATS<br />

BY ATRIUM<br />

Picture © Cassandra Tsolakis<br />

Celebrating<br />

five centuries of<br />

Andrea Palladio<br />

Andrea Palladio (1508-80) was<br />

the most influential Western<br />

architect of all time. The second<br />

was the Swiss-born French architect Le<br />

Corbusier (1887-1965) whose legacy is<br />

now a global phenomenon. But what<br />

unites, and what separates, these two<br />

giants, born centuries apart? The parallels<br />

are powerful and often surprising.<br />

The Renaissance architect is best<br />

known for taking the pediments of<br />

classical temples and applying them to<br />

domestic architecture, whether country<br />

villas or relatively modest farm buildings<br />

in his native Veneto region. They are<br />

symmetrical and have proportions based<br />

on the ‘golden section’. Other common<br />

features are Venetian windows (also<br />

called Serliana or Palladian) and the use<br />

of one of the classical Orders.<br />

None of these is to be found in Le<br />

Corbusier’s works, far from it. But a<br />

detailed investigation reveals more than<br />

a dozen comparisons worthy of further<br />

study, beginning with their domestic<br />

circumstances and what the latter said he<br />

learnt from the former.<br />

Palladio’s father was a miller and<br />

small-time entrepreneur, Le Corbusier’s a<br />

watchmaker. While it’s true that, just like<br />

other professions such as medicine and<br />

law, architecture tends to be hereditary it<br />

was not so in this case. Both were largely<br />

self-taught, through reading, writing and<br />

doing, though in the former’s case also<br />

through studying classical ruins at first<br />

hand.<br />

One was born Andrea di Pietro della<br />

Gondola, the other Charles-Édouard<br />

Jenneret-Gris. Palladio was a given name,<br />

after the Greek goddess of wisdom,<br />

and Corb chose his own. Both believed<br />

in the transformative power of design,<br />

and they were brilliant marketeers: both<br />

were, ultimately, more famous for what<br />

they wrote and published than for what<br />

they built. Palladio’s Quattro Libri (Four<br />

Books) was published in 1570, just 10<br />

years before his death, while Toward an<br />

Architecture, first published in 1923 and<br />

never since out of print, was a relatively<br />

early proclamation of Corb’s radical<br />

ideas, influences and early designs.<br />

Both were prolific in output, across a<br />

wide range of building types, but they are<br />

best remembered for their domestic and<br />

religious works. In a curious inversion,<br />

Corb’s latest and greatest works could be<br />

said to be religious; namely, Ronchamp<br />

Pilgrimage Church and La Tourette,<br />

even though he was agnostic, while the<br />

architect of the magnificent S Giorgio<br />

Maggiore and Il Redentore, in Venice, is<br />

better known for his houses.<br />

Both have more work finished in<br />

stucco than stonework (or concrete for<br />

that matter); both favoured white over<br />

other colours; both suffered at the hands<br />

of clients and had problems collecting<br />

their fees; both were the target of rivals<br />

and enemies; both survived into their<br />

seventies; and both had major projects<br />

completed after their respective deaths.<br />

And both gave a name to their respective<br />

movements; Palladian and Corbusian.<br />

Neither became wealthy.<br />

Where they do differ is often in their<br />

form-making, beliefs, travels and family<br />

life.<br />

For Francis Terry, architect son of<br />

contemporary neo-classicist architect<br />

Quinlan, Palladio was a “one-trick pony”.<br />

He was highly derivative of what came<br />

before him, an imitator rather than an<br />

innovator. The same could be said to a<br />

certain degree about Corb, but the latter<br />

was exceptionally clever in covering his<br />

tracks: he tended to steal other’s work,<br />

whether approaches, ideas and forms,<br />

and claim them for his own. As his<br />

friend Picasso maintained, “Bad artists<br />

copy, good artists steal”.<br />

Corb travelled widely but not<br />

Palladio; the one had strong political<br />

beliefs, fundamentally totalitarian,<br />

whether of Left or Right (Corb was<br />

accused of being both a Fascist and a<br />

Communist during his lifetime); the<br />

other religious. And while UNESCO<br />

has bestowed World Heritage status<br />

on Palladio’s output, none has so far<br />

been awarded to his later, even more<br />

prominent peer. The Fondation Le<br />

Corbusier in Paris was hoping for an<br />

accolade this year, half a century after his<br />

death, but it has yet to happen.<br />

A question that may reasonably be<br />

asked is, just how far did Le Corbusier<br />

self-consciously model himself on<br />

Palladio? In the 1930s he told us himself<br />

that his architecture was influenced<br />

“by the spirit of Palladio”. The late<br />

architecture critic, Colin Rowe, showed<br />

us how in his seminal article of 1947, The<br />

Mathematics of the Ideal Villa.<br />

This enunciated modernism’s debt to<br />

classicism, by comparing the plans and<br />

elevations of Villa Foscari (known as the<br />

Malcontenta) outside Venice, and the<br />

Villa Stein-de Monzie at Garches.<br />

Three other aspects support this theory<br />

of copying: his acquired name (and also<br />

various motifs); his prodigious literary<br />

output (knowing this would have much<br />

greater impact than just his buildings<br />

themselves); and publishing his own<br />

work alongside great works from history.<br />

There are several other tell-tale signs,<br />

such as Palladio’s decision to choose just<br />

one other near-contemporary architect to<br />

mention and publish alongside himself,<br />

namely Bramante (1444-1514); Le<br />

Corbusier ditto, but in his case Tony<br />

Garnier (1869-1948).<br />

The greatest collection of original<br />

Palladio drawings in the world is held by<br />

the RIBA Library. In a new exhibition<br />

at its headquarters in Portland Place,<br />

and open until January 2016, visitors<br />

can trace Palladio’s influence down the<br />

centuries, not just in continental Europe<br />

but the US (both the White House<br />

and the Capitol building, for example),<br />

its adoption by the English Palladians<br />

such as Inigo Jones, Lord Burlington,<br />

Colen Campbell, William Kent and Sir<br />

Edwin Lutyens; and various twentieth<br />

century abstractions, distillations and<br />

simplifications.<br />

Curators Charles Hind and Vicky<br />

Wilson have done a great service to the<br />

exhibition and Palladio’s legacy with<br />

this show. There are films, models and<br />

photographs as well as drawings; and<br />

a series of talks, events and workshops<br />

over the coming weeks.<br />

There are also various corruptions<br />

of Palladio’s ideals, for no style has ever<br />

proved so popular for contemporary<br />

houses by spec developers. His noble<br />

designs confer status on their owners.<br />

“Passion can make drama out of inert<br />

stone”, Palladio might have said it, but<br />

in fact it was Le Corbusier in his book<br />

Toward an Architecture. The “passion”<br />

and “drama” he refers to are real enough,<br />

even if the “stone” often turns out to be<br />

stucco, in the case of our Renaissance<br />

architect, or even reinforced concrete in<br />

the case of our Neo-Renaissance one.<br />

Palladian Design: The Good,<br />

the Bad and the Unexpected<br />

is at the Royal Institute of British<br />

Architects, 66 Portland Place, London<br />

W1B 1AD, until 9 January 2016.<br />

Admission free.<br />

The Architecture Gallery is open 10am-<br />

5pm Monday to Sunday and until 8pm<br />

every Tuesday.<br />

More at www.architecture.com/<br />

PalladianDesign

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!