28.10.2015 Views

Discrimination

EN-turkiye-egitim-sisteminde-ayirimcilik-24-10-2015

EN-turkiye-egitim-sisteminde-ayirimcilik-24-10-2015

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32 <strong>Discrimination</strong> in Turkey’s Education System<br />

munity, 5 to the Greek community, 1 to the Jewish<br />

community and 1 to the Syriac community.<br />

In 2012 the Syriac community, which had been<br />

denied the right to receive education in its mother<br />

tongue throughout the Republican period, applied<br />

to the Istanbul Directorate of National Education<br />

for permission to establish a preschool offering<br />

education in Syriac. However, the application was<br />

rejected with the justification that Syriacs were not<br />

a minority and therefore did not have the right to<br />

establish a school providing education in ‘a foreign<br />

language’. 30 The community brought this issue before<br />

the Administrative Tribunal with a request to<br />

reverse this decision, and the Tribunal ruled that<br />

Syriacs were a minority and therefore had the right,<br />

according to the Treaty of Lausanne, to establish a<br />

school providing education in their own language. 31<br />

The preschool established in Istanbul by the Syriac<br />

community following this ruling brought the number<br />

of minority schools in Turkey to 24.<br />

When minority schools were attached to the<br />

Ministry of National Education by the Law on the<br />

Unification of Education that was introduced in<br />

1924, they completely lost the (cultural) autonomy<br />

they had held during the Ottoman period. The<br />

curriculum used at these schools is the same as<br />

that of other schools; unlike other schools, however,<br />

these minority schools provide multilingual<br />

education, with Armenian schools teaching in Armenian<br />

and Turkish, Greek schools in Greek and<br />

Turkish, and the Jewish school in Turkish and<br />

English. The Jewish school also provides Hebrew<br />

lessons at every grade level.<br />

Throughout the history of the Republic, minority<br />

schools whose existence was guaranteed by<br />

the Treaty of Lausanne have suffered from treat-<br />

30 On the rejection of the Syriac community’s<br />

request for education in the mother tongue,<br />

see ‘Azınlık Değilsiniz Yabancı Dilde Eğitim<br />

Yapamazsınız’, http://www.agos.com.tr/<br />

tr/yazi/2231/suryanilere-anadilde-egitimreddi-azinlik-degilsiniz-yabanci-dilde-egitimyapamazsiniz<br />

31 ‘Utandıran Yasak Bitti: Süryaniler Anadilde Eğitime<br />

Başlıyor’, Taraf, 10 August 2013, http://www.taraf.<br />

com.tr/haber-utandiran-yasak-bitti-suryanileranadilde-egitime-131282<br />

ment that was in violation both of this treaty and<br />

of international law, and sometimes even of national<br />

legislation. Policies towards these schools,<br />

which have long been considered a threat to national<br />

unity, have relaxed in recent years but so far<br />

no steps to bring about a long-term solution have<br />

been made. The main problems currently faced by<br />

minority schools are outlined below.<br />

Problems of status<br />

Minority schools are not foreign or private<br />

schools, but despite this they are mostly treated<br />

as private schools, while in certain situations<br />

they are considered foreign schools. There is no<br />

law that defines minority schools and regulates<br />

their rights and responsibilities, and these schools<br />

are subject to legislation related to private education<br />

institutions. 32 Even though they are not<br />

profit-making private schools, minority schools<br />

are treated as such and this situation puts them<br />

at a significant disadvantage. For example, even<br />

though these schools have very limited financial<br />

resources, they are required to apply the standards<br />

expected of private schools.<br />

Furthermore, the fact that there is no status particular<br />

to minority schools occasionally causes confusion<br />

in the bureaucratic process, which can lead<br />

to negative repercussions. One of the most striking<br />

examples of the problem of a lack of status was the<br />

fact that these schools, which are considered private<br />

schools, were recently requested to provide<br />

documentation showing that they had made VAT<br />

payments. Moreover, the lack of status sometimes<br />

creates problems in terms of meeting the needs and<br />

demands of schools. For example, in response to<br />

a request for a budget to be allocated to minority<br />

schools, the MoNE stated that the Ministry had no<br />

such budget. There is also no special unit within<br />

the MoNE responsible for minority schools, and<br />

these schools are attached to the General Directorate<br />

of Private Education Institutions.<br />

32 Law No. 5580 on Private Education Institutions;<br />

‘Ministry of National Education Regulation on<br />

Private Education Institutions’ published in Official<br />

Gazette no. 28239 of 20 March 2012.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!