Discrimination
EN-turkiye-egitim-sisteminde-ayirimcilik-24-10-2015
EN-turkiye-egitim-sisteminde-ayirimcilik-24-10-2015
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
32 <strong>Discrimination</strong> in Turkey’s Education System<br />
munity, 5 to the Greek community, 1 to the Jewish<br />
community and 1 to the Syriac community.<br />
In 2012 the Syriac community, which had been<br />
denied the right to receive education in its mother<br />
tongue throughout the Republican period, applied<br />
to the Istanbul Directorate of National Education<br />
for permission to establish a preschool offering<br />
education in Syriac. However, the application was<br />
rejected with the justification that Syriacs were not<br />
a minority and therefore did not have the right to<br />
establish a school providing education in ‘a foreign<br />
language’. 30 The community brought this issue before<br />
the Administrative Tribunal with a request to<br />
reverse this decision, and the Tribunal ruled that<br />
Syriacs were a minority and therefore had the right,<br />
according to the Treaty of Lausanne, to establish a<br />
school providing education in their own language. 31<br />
The preschool established in Istanbul by the Syriac<br />
community following this ruling brought the number<br />
of minority schools in Turkey to 24.<br />
When minority schools were attached to the<br />
Ministry of National Education by the Law on the<br />
Unification of Education that was introduced in<br />
1924, they completely lost the (cultural) autonomy<br />
they had held during the Ottoman period. The<br />
curriculum used at these schools is the same as<br />
that of other schools; unlike other schools, however,<br />
these minority schools provide multilingual<br />
education, with Armenian schools teaching in Armenian<br />
and Turkish, Greek schools in Greek and<br />
Turkish, and the Jewish school in Turkish and<br />
English. The Jewish school also provides Hebrew<br />
lessons at every grade level.<br />
Throughout the history of the Republic, minority<br />
schools whose existence was guaranteed by<br />
the Treaty of Lausanne have suffered from treat-<br />
30 On the rejection of the Syriac community’s<br />
request for education in the mother tongue,<br />
see ‘Azınlık Değilsiniz Yabancı Dilde Eğitim<br />
Yapamazsınız’, http://www.agos.com.tr/<br />
tr/yazi/2231/suryanilere-anadilde-egitimreddi-azinlik-degilsiniz-yabanci-dilde-egitimyapamazsiniz<br />
31 ‘Utandıran Yasak Bitti: Süryaniler Anadilde Eğitime<br />
Başlıyor’, Taraf, 10 August 2013, http://www.taraf.<br />
com.tr/haber-utandiran-yasak-bitti-suryanileranadilde-egitime-131282<br />
ment that was in violation both of this treaty and<br />
of international law, and sometimes even of national<br />
legislation. Policies towards these schools,<br />
which have long been considered a threat to national<br />
unity, have relaxed in recent years but so far<br />
no steps to bring about a long-term solution have<br />
been made. The main problems currently faced by<br />
minority schools are outlined below.<br />
Problems of status<br />
Minority schools are not foreign or private<br />
schools, but despite this they are mostly treated<br />
as private schools, while in certain situations<br />
they are considered foreign schools. There is no<br />
law that defines minority schools and regulates<br />
their rights and responsibilities, and these schools<br />
are subject to legislation related to private education<br />
institutions. 32 Even though they are not<br />
profit-making private schools, minority schools<br />
are treated as such and this situation puts them<br />
at a significant disadvantage. For example, even<br />
though these schools have very limited financial<br />
resources, they are required to apply the standards<br />
expected of private schools.<br />
Furthermore, the fact that there is no status particular<br />
to minority schools occasionally causes confusion<br />
in the bureaucratic process, which can lead<br />
to negative repercussions. One of the most striking<br />
examples of the problem of a lack of status was the<br />
fact that these schools, which are considered private<br />
schools, were recently requested to provide<br />
documentation showing that they had made VAT<br />
payments. Moreover, the lack of status sometimes<br />
creates problems in terms of meeting the needs and<br />
demands of schools. For example, in response to<br />
a request for a budget to be allocated to minority<br />
schools, the MoNE stated that the Ministry had no<br />
such budget. There is also no special unit within<br />
the MoNE responsible for minority schools, and<br />
these schools are attached to the General Directorate<br />
of Private Education Institutions.<br />
32 Law No. 5580 on Private Education Institutions;<br />
‘Ministry of National Education Regulation on<br />
Private Education Institutions’ published in Official<br />
Gazette no. 28239 of 20 March 2012.