29.10.2015 Views

October 17-21 2015 Baltimore Maryland

XwI2O0

XwI2O0

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to touch test notable for a 44% fertilization rate. On day 5, one expanded blastocyst,<br />

B/B, was transferred with a negative pregnancy test. In the second cycle,<br />

<strong>17</strong> mature oocytes underwent ICSI with sperm that responded to<br />

Pentoxifylline, with a 47% fertilization rate. Two B/B expanded blastocysts<br />

were cryopreserved due to concern for ovarian hyperstimulation in the female<br />

partner. Among all three cycles, fertilization rate was 43.5%.<br />

CONCLUSIONS: SVSA is a reasonable option to retrieve sperm in<br />

wounded warriors or trauma patients with pelvic or perineal injuries.<br />

Supported by: This research was Supported, in part, by the Program in<br />

Reproductive and Adult Endocrinology, NICHD, NIH.<br />

O-26 Monday, <strong>October</strong> 19, <strong>2015</strong> 11:30 AM<br />

EVALUATION OF REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM ANATOMY AND<br />

GONADAL FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH PRUNE-BELLY<br />

SYNDROME. M. Cocuzza, a B. C. Tiseo, a R. Park, a G. P. Padovani, a<br />

R. H. Baroni, b A. Tavares, a F. T. Denes, a M. Srougi. a a Division of Urology,<br />

Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo,<br />

Brazil; b Radiology Institute, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo<br />

Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.<br />

OBJECTIVE: To report the first series of Prune-belly syndrome (PBS) patients<br />

that were submitted to surgical treatment during early childhood<br />

focusing in the evaluation of reproductive system anatomy and gonadal function.<br />

To date, PBS patients were diagnosed as infertile and fertility was often<br />

given lowest priority. Their infertility is multifactorial and is probably related<br />

to the undescended testes, prostatic hypoplasia and retrograde ejaculation.<br />

There are no documented cases of unassisted paternity; few successful pregnancies<br />

have been reported through assisted reproduction, but all using<br />

epididymal or testicular sperm extraction.<br />

DESIGN: Series of case analysis.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We accessed 30 patients with PBS from<br />

our service that were submitted to any surgical procedure during their<br />

childhood and now are at least 14 years old. Patient records were accessed<br />

to identify age at orchidopexy. All patients were submitted to pelvic MRI in<br />

order to evaluate anatomical findings of reproductive system, including<br />

prostate size, characteristics of seminal vesicles and vas deferentia. Serum<br />

levels of LH, FSH, testosterone and also creatinine were evaluated. Sperm<br />

analysis was conducted and analysis of the urine after masturbation when<br />

needed.<br />

RESULTS: We contacted 18 patients. Of those, 15 had reliable data from<br />

patient records including physical examination and hormone profile. The<br />

average of age of this group at evaluation is 18.2 years. The average age at<br />

orchidopexy was <strong>17</strong> months and an average follow-up was <strong>17</strong>.4 years. All<br />

had normal physical development and stable anatomy and function of the reconstructed<br />

urinary tract with an average creatinine of 1.64 mg/dL. Fourteen<br />

patients had both testes in scrotum, and the testicular volume varied from<br />

2.1cc to 9.4cc, averaging 6.9cc. Eight patients collected semen with a sperm<br />

count of 5.07 million/mL, whereas motile sperm was found in 62.5%<br />

including three in the ejaculate and two in urine after masturbation. Average<br />

hormones levels were LH: 5.3 mg/dL, FSH: 6.9 mg/dL, total testosterone:<br />

531.2 mg/dL and free testosterone: 450.6 mg/dL. MRI revealed prostates hypoplastic<br />

in 55.6% and absent in 22.3%, while 55.6% had absence of at least<br />

one of the seminal vesicles. There was no vasal abnormality.<br />

CONCLUSIONS: Our data enlightens findings in patients with PBS that<br />

were not described yet. A high prevalence of hypoplastic or absent prostate<br />

and seminal vesicle abnormalities was observed in our patients; those findings<br />

may represent their main cause of infertility. Probably, early orchidopexy<br />

increases testicular function salvage preserving their fertility<br />

potential patients leading to the finding of motile sperm in the ejaculate or<br />

in urine after masturbation. The next step is to provide a better understanding<br />

of their fertility potential improving quality of life.<br />

O-27 Monday, <strong>October</strong> 19, <strong>2015</strong> 11:45 AM<br />

THE EFFECTS OF TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL<br />

INCISION OF TUNICA ALBUGINEA IN MICRODISSECTION<br />

TESTICULAR SPERM EXTRACTION. T. Ishikawa, K. Yamaguchi,<br />

R. Nishiyama, Y. Takaya, K. Kitaya, H. Matsubayashi. Reproduction Clinic<br />

Osaka, Osaka, Japan.<br />

OBJECTIVE: The optimal technique of sperm extraction would be<br />

minimally invasive and avoid destruction of testicular function without<br />

compromising the chance of retrieval adequate numbers of spermatozoa to<br />

perform ICSI. In general, the tunica albuginea should be opened on an equatorial<br />

plane because antimesenteric incision increases the risk of testicular<br />

devascularization and may adversely affect access to the seminiferous tubules.<br />

To demonstrate the differences of sperm retrieval rate (SRR) and postoperative<br />

complication between transverse or longitudinal incision of tunica<br />

albuginea in microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro TESE).<br />

DESIGN: A retrospective study.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1080 patients (including 970<br />

46XY males with NOA and 110 Klinefelter syndrome (KS) patients) underwent<br />

micro TESE were subjected to sperm retrieval procedures. All operations<br />

were performed by one surgeon (TI). Karyotyping test was<br />

performed on a sample of blood to all patients. SRR and postoperative<br />

complication were analyzed in the 960 patients with transverse incision<br />

(group T) and the 120 patients with longitudinal incision (group L). Ninety<br />

and 20 non-mosaic KS cases each were included in group T and group L,<br />

respectively.<br />

RESULTS: Testicular sperm were successfully retrieved by micro-TESE<br />

in 415 of 960 (43.2%) NOA (including 47 of 90 KS: 52.2%) and 56 of 120<br />

(46.7%) NOA (including 10 of 20 KS: 50%) patients with group T and group<br />

L incision in micro TESE, respectively. There was no significant difference<br />

of sperm retrieval rate with either approach. No patients had postoperative<br />

complications such as major hematoma or leakage of seminiferous tubules<br />

through this series. The hospital stay was all the same in both groups<br />

(a-day-surgery). For the 46XY males with NOA patients, after micro-<br />

TESE, the testosterone level did not drop significantly in both group T and<br />

group L. In addition, there were no significant differences in the levels of<br />

testosterone between group T and group L for the 46XY males with NOA<br />

patients. Of the KS patients who underwent micro TESE, the mean serum<br />

testosterone level showed an average decline of 30-35% from baseline<br />

when assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months after micro-TESE, but no significant differences<br />

were also shown in the levels of testosterone between group T and<br />

group L.<br />

CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences between transverse<br />

or longitudinal incision for SRR and postoperative complication in<br />

micro TESE. We should take care of the hypogonadism in KS patients after<br />

even microdissection procedure by either transverse or longitudinal incision.<br />

O-28 Monday, <strong>October</strong> 19, <strong>2015</strong> 12:00 PM<br />

COMPARISON OF SEMEN QUALITY BETWEEN UNIVERSITY<br />

AND PRIVATE CLINIC LABORATORIES. O. Khan, a C. F. Jensen, b<br />

J. Sonksen, b M. Fode, b T. Shah, c D. A. Ohl. a a Urology, University of Michigan,<br />

Ann Arbor, MI;<br />

b Urology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev,<br />

Denmark; c Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,<br />

MI.<br />

OBJECTIVE: Obtaining an ejaculate and performing a semen analysis<br />

(SA) is an essential first step in evaluating the infertile man. Based on the<br />

SA the physician determines the nature of further evaluation and treatment.<br />

Multiple treatment options are available and range from simple counseling to<br />

the more complicated and expensive assisted reproduction techniques<br />

(ART). The objective of this study was to investigate inter-laboratory variation<br />

in semen quality between private ART laboratories and university-based<br />

ART laboratories respectively.<br />

DESIGN: Clinical retrospective study.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS: IRB approval was obtained to retrospectively<br />

evaluate patients who had undergone a SA at both the University<br />

of Michigan Center For Reproductive Medicine and private practice IVF<br />

clinics. When more than one SA was available from both clinics the SA<br />

with the highest total motile sperm was selected for analysis. Major semen<br />

parameters from both SA’s were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank<br />

test.<br />

RESULTS: A total of 20 men aged 35 6 (mean SD) years were<br />

included in the study. Table 1 shows comparisons of the major semen parameters<br />

obtained at the two laboratories. Morphology was reported significantly<br />

lower at the private clinics.<br />

CONCLUSIONS: In this small series, morphology was significantly lower<br />

in semen analyses performed at private IVF clinics. Since sperm morphology<br />

under 5% is commonly used to recommend IVF with ISCI, underestimation<br />

of sperm morphology at private clinics may lead to over-utilization of high<br />

level assisted reproductive techniques at these sites.<br />

FERTILITY & STERILITY Ò<br />

e11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!