16.11.2015 Views

SUSTAINABILITY

UBUt5

UBUt5

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AROUND THE REGIONS<br />

Wiltshire<br />

MOD Corsham<br />

20<br />

Overgrown pond © Nicky Wookey<br />

A purpose built pond for great crested<br />

newts (GCN) Triturus cristatus was<br />

surveyed in 2007 and confirmed the<br />

presence of the species as well as<br />

palmate Lissotriton helveticus and<br />

smooth newt Lissotriton vulgaris.<br />

Unfortunately a repeat survey in 2013<br />

only found palmate and smooth newts.<br />

The reason for their absence is<br />

unknown, although a combination of<br />

predation and a reduction in habitat<br />

quality may be factors. This prompted<br />

conservation works to the pond which<br />

included cutting back banks of bramble<br />

and trimming trees to reduce shading.<br />

As pond management works were<br />

proposed for late 2014, a follow up<br />

survey was carried out in April 2014. This<br />

confirmed a maximum count of 14 GCN,<br />

along with smooth and palmate newts.<br />

out the pond management work<br />

providing the method statement was<br />

followed to the letter. The aim was to<br />

undertake habitat improvement in<br />

January 2015.<br />

The majority of the pond had been<br />

swamped by reed, with over-hanging<br />

willow on its northern and eastern side.<br />

Leaf litter, branches and silt equated to<br />

approximately 30cm in depth.<br />

To improve the condition of the<br />

pond in line with the GCN<br />

Conser vation Handbook the<br />

following task s were identified.<br />

• Partially pulling of emergent<br />

vegetation<br />

• Cutting back over hanging trees<br />

• Partial-desilting and clearance<br />

of leaf-fall<br />

Where possible the works proposed<br />

would aim to provide the following<br />

characteristics:<br />

• Surface area between 100<br />

and 300m 2<br />

• Depth may vary; both deep<br />

(up to 4m) and shallows<br />

• Substantial cover of submerged<br />

and marginal vegetation<br />

• Open areas to facilitate courtship<br />

• Absence of shading on the<br />

south side<br />

• Absence of fish<br />

• Absence or low density of<br />

water fowl<br />

Partial removal of marginal and<br />

emergent vegetation was carried out<br />

by hand and a ‘fringe’ of vegetation<br />

was left around at least a half of the<br />

pond edge.<br />

Trees and scrub on the northern side<br />

of the pond were retained though<br />

shading vegetation on the southern<br />

sides was removed. Log piles were left<br />

and scrub vegetation was cut-back just<br />

above ground level. Care was taken<br />

not to remove vegetation in areas that<br />

may be used as a hibernacula.<br />

Silt and debris was removed by hand<br />

to increase the general depth of the<br />

pond and provide open areas.<br />

Nicky Wookey<br />

Compliance Advisor<br />

Interserve Support Services<br />

As GCNs were recorded, under the<br />

Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as<br />

amended), no works should be<br />

undertaken in and around the pond<br />

without a Conservation Licence from<br />

Natural England (NE). Af ter discussions<br />

with NE, it was confirmed that a licence<br />

would not be required as the method<br />

statement was updated. Interserve<br />

personnel were given the task to carry<br />

Conservation works to the pond © Nicky Wookey<br />

Sanctuary 44 • 2015 93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!