JOHN CALVIN
Calvin_Response
Calvin_Response
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
46<br />
other festivals, and solemn days, which they carefully observed. But under the reign of Christ<br />
there shall be a constant and uninterrupted solemnity; for there are not fixed and stated days of<br />
sacrifices on which we must go to Jerusalem, or offer anything in one place or in another; but<br />
our oblations, festivals, and rejoicings are continued from day to day in unbroken succession.<br />
Yet he alludes to the ancient custom of sacrifices as we have already said that the prophets are<br />
frequently accustomed to do.<br />
So then the Lord wishes to have “pure sacrifices” offered to him daily, (1 Peter 2:5,) not such as<br />
were formerly offered under the Law or are now offered by Papists, who either rely foolishly on<br />
their ceremonies, as if they were expiations of crime, or basely venture to sacrifice Christ, but<br />
spiritual sacrifices, that we may reverence and adore God with a pure and sincere worship.<br />
(John 4:24.) As to the opinion held by some, that this passage proves the abrogation of the Law<br />
and of ancient ceremonies, it does not appear to me to rest on sufficient grounds, it is indeed<br />
certain that those legal ceremonies have been set aside, and that may be gathered from this<br />
passage; but in proof of that point I would choose to employ other passages which contain<br />
stronger evidence. There is only here a contrast between the Sabbath and festivals which were<br />
celebrated under the Law, and the perpetual Sabbath which we have at the present day.<br />
(Hebrews 4:9, 10.)<br />
For the law having a shadow of good things to come, [and] not the very image of the things,<br />
can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers<br />
thereunto perfect. (Hebrews 10:1)<br />
The difference...which the Apostle makes between the Law and the Gospel is this, — that under<br />
the Law was shadowed forth only in rude and imperfect lines what is under the Gospel set forth<br />
in living colors and graphically distinct. He thus confirms again what he had previously said,<br />
that the Law was not useless, nor its ceremonies unprofitable. For though there was not in them<br />
the image of heavenly things, finished, as they say, by the last touch of the artist; yet the