09.03.2016 Views

Providence

2016_oah_program_w_ads_vd_online

2016_oah_program_w_ads_vd_online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THURSDAY SESSIONS<br />

PLENARY SESSIONS<br />

Thursday, April 7, 3:30 pm – 5:00 pm<br />

Thursday<br />

Worst. President. Ever.<br />

#OAH_badpres<br />

Chair: Claire Potter, The New School<br />

Panelists:<br />

• David Greenberg, Rutgers University<br />

• Annette Gordon-Reed, Harvard University<br />

• Sean Wilentz, Princeton University<br />

Discussions of leadership frequently turn to the U.S. presidency,<br />

and discussions of the presidency frequently turn to ratings. The<br />

top presidents, and the reasons for their greatness, are familiar and<br />

literally graven in stone. The worst presidents, though, are a more<br />

nebulous group. We take the time and expertise of a variety of top<br />

historians to talk about what makes for poor performance in the<br />

White House, how we know it, and what it tells us about American<br />

leadership more generally.<br />

Thursday, April 7, 5:15 pm – 6:45 pm<br />

Historian Presidents<br />

#OAH_histlead<br />

Chair: Jon Butler, Howard R. Lamar Professor Emeritus of American<br />

Studies, History, and Religious Studies, Yale University; Adjunct<br />

Research Professor of History, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities<br />

Panelists:<br />

• Drew Faust, Harvard University<br />

• Ricardo Romo, University of Texas at San Antonio<br />

• Edward Ayers, University of Richmond<br />

This plenary session features four prominent historians who lead<br />

or have lead universities, organizations, and foundations. OAH<br />

president-elect Ed Ayers will lead a discussion that will take up the<br />

challenges and rewards of leading complex institutions.<br />

The panelists will consider several questions: As a productive,<br />

working historian, why did you agree to take a job as a president<br />

of a university or foundation or as a dean or director? What in your<br />

scholarly life has made a difference in your administrative life?<br />

Looking back, do you think scholars, and historians specifically,<br />

should encourage graduate training in academic leadership? What<br />

tools should we look to develop? What are the pleasures of academic<br />

administration? What are the obstacles, pitfalls, problems? And<br />

finally, we are snowed with accounts of the academy in crisis, of<br />

the humanities pushed to the sidelines, of declining enrollments in<br />

history. How have these stories looked from your office?<br />

LEGEND<br />

Public History<br />

Teaching<br />

Community College<br />

Professional Development<br />

RHODE ISLAND CONVENTION CENTER<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!