11.03.2016 Views

ISSUES OF CONCERN

Issues_of_Concern_February_2016

Issues_of_Concern_February_2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

was a clear opportunity for the new<br />

ruling classes, who took over from<br />

the British, to outlaw castes too. But<br />

they hoodwinked people outlawing only<br />

untouchability. They had not stopped at<br />

that; they diluted it by extending it to<br />

potentially all and sundry. They created<br />

a separate schedule for the tribals to have<br />

ditto provisions of the scheduled castes.<br />

Notwithstanding the lack of foolproof<br />

criteria to identify people in this schedule<br />

for tribes, they could have been merged<br />

into the existing schedule (suitably<br />

renaming it) and thereby diluted the<br />

caste stigma associated with the schedule<br />

for Dalits (because the tribals did not<br />

have caste). They haven’t even stopped<br />

at that. They would create a vague<br />

provision that the state would identify<br />

the ‘backward classes’ (read castes) so as<br />

to extend similar provisions in future. It<br />

verily amounted to constructing a can of<br />

caste worms the lid of which could be<br />

opened at an opportune time in future<br />

as the Prime Minister VP Singh did in<br />

1990. The entire schema about castes<br />

being kept alive comes out clear when<br />

we see similar scheming around religion,<br />

the other weapon to divide people.<br />

VP Singh, Prime Minister of India (1990) [31]<br />

The Constitution scrupulously<br />

avoided the term ‘secular’ that could<br />

create a separating wall between religion<br />

and politics with an alibi to have space<br />

for the state to carry out religion-related<br />

reforms. The only reform that one could<br />

imagine was in the form of passing<br />

the Commission of Sati (Prevention)<br />

Act, 1987 in the wake of burning of<br />

Roop Kanwar on her husband’s pyre.<br />

It is important to understand these<br />

matters because they directly cross the<br />

emancipation agenda of Dalits. The<br />

answer to the second part of your<br />

question is thus yes.<br />

The post-independence ruling classes<br />

had overtaken the colonial masters<br />

in treachery. Castes, instead of an<br />

opportunity to annihilate as explained,<br />

were given a new lease of life. They have<br />

used the colonial policy but mutilated<br />

it in such a way as to forge a<br />

powerful weapon out of it. The Mandal<br />

Commission was a part of this schema.<br />

It was, as I said, a can of caste worms.<br />

Its implementation led to re-castization<br />

of society. The reservations for Dalits<br />

and Adivasis were almost normalized but<br />

the Mandal reservations opened up the<br />

entire issue of reservations and brought<br />

the reservations of Dalits into question.<br />

It was a mix of age old prejudice against<br />

Dalits as ‘inferior’ people, accentuated<br />

by their cultural assertion, and the<br />

perceived favour of the state which grew<br />

as the electoral competition increased<br />

by the late 1960s. The reservation<br />

became an open ended policy which<br />

could be granted to any caste if it could<br />

prove to be ‘socially and educationally’<br />

backward. The agitations of castes broke<br />

out everywhere demanding reservations<br />

as the OBCs or the Scheduled Tribes but<br />

never as the Scheduled caste, proving<br />

thereby the salience of castes. The<br />

political parties promoted it to garner<br />

votes in elections.<br />

How does Casteism differ in Urban &<br />

Rural spaces?<br />

Caste has been a life - world of people<br />

February 2016 Issues Of <strong>CONCERN</strong> No. 7 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!