11.03.2016 Views

ISSUES OF CONCERN

Issues_of_Concern_February_2016

Issues_of_Concern_February_2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

are covered under the broader social<br />

rubric of identity. Both are ascribed<br />

and hereditary identity. While racism<br />

emphasizes skin colour or some other<br />

physical feature, the casteism stresses<br />

hierarchy based on birth with supposed<br />

religious and social justification. Their<br />

practice in daily life is reflected in<br />

differential treatment, discrimination<br />

and prejudice against people who do<br />

not form part of one’s coherent and<br />

homogeneous social groups/community<br />

(race or caste). Thus, on salient<br />

parameters of practice, both the systems<br />

appear similar.<br />

Promotional poster [35] for<br />

World Conference Against Racism, 2001<br />

The issue whether caste and race<br />

could be equated flared up during the<br />

World Conference Against Racism, Racial<br />

Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related<br />

Intolerance (WCAR), organised by the<br />

United Nations in Durban in 2001. Since<br />

there is no UN forum on castes, the<br />

Dalit groups collected there contended<br />

that caste discrimination also should be<br />

included in the conference. India had<br />

signed and ratified the convention in<br />

1969 but had not yet given accession<br />

and succession. According to Article<br />

1 of the Convention, the term ‘racial<br />

discrimination’ meant ‘any distinction,<br />

exclusion, restriction or preference based<br />

on race, colour, descent, or national<br />

or ethnic origin which has the purpose<br />

or effect of nullifying or impairing the<br />

recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on<br />

an equal footing, of human rights and<br />

fundamental freedoms in the political,<br />

economic, social, cultural or any other<br />

field of public life.’<br />

The stand of the government was<br />

that while it is committed to eliminating<br />

discrimination in all forms, it did<br />

not consider caste as part of ‘racial<br />

discrimination’. The government as well<br />

as its sponsored intellectuals claimed<br />

that ‘caste is not race’, and that ‘caste<br />

is not based on descent’. They were<br />

wrong. It was not a question of race<br />

and caste being equal, the issue was<br />

whether racism and casteism, the praxis<br />

of them, were equal or not. The answer<br />

is unequivocal yes.<br />

How did most political parties deal<br />

with Casteism - right from Dalit massacres<br />

(such as Khairlanji), all the way<br />

to Subtle Discrimination?<br />

For political parties, as explained above,<br />

caste has been the staple food. No<br />

political party participating in Indian<br />

elections, which are based on the FPTP<br />

system, can ignore castes. Not even the<br />

parliamentary communist parties could<br />

really ignore the caste arithmetic. The<br />

caste arithmetic includes all kind of<br />

dynamics depending on the situation.<br />

It includes promoting consolidation of<br />

castes as well as splitting them; it may<br />

February 2016 Issues Of <strong>CONCERN</strong> No. 7 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!