07.04.2016 Views

Terror

4_27_15_Stanton_ArsenalofTerror

4_27_15_Stanton_ArsenalofTerror

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Committee for Human Rights in North Korea<br />

7. Other Conduct Cited<br />

Not all of the categories of conduct the U.S. State Department has cited in its country reports<br />

on the state sponsorship of terrorism fit within the definitions of “support,” “international terrorism,”<br />

or “terrorist activity.” The U.S. State Department’s reporting of this conduct has sometimes<br />

exceeded the reporting requirements of FRAA Section 140. The U.S. State Department may have<br />

reported this conduct in accordance with other policy considerations to support a government’s<br />

SSOT listing.<br />

For example, State has cited Iran, Syria, and North Korea for concerns about proliferation of<br />

nuclear and chemical weapons, and ballistic missiles. In explaining its rationale for including<br />

this conduct in its annual reporting, the State Department said the following:<br />

State sponsors of terrorism provide critical support to non-state<br />

terrorist groups. Without state sponsors, terrorist groups would have<br />

greater difficulty obtaining the funds, weapons, materials, and secure<br />

areas they require to plan and conduct operations. More worrisome is<br />

that some of these countries also have the capability to manufacture<br />

weapons of mass destruction (WMD) that could get into the hands of<br />

terrorists. The United States will continue to insist that these countries<br />

end the support they give to terrorist groups. 112<br />

State has historically reported on states’ WMD development and proliferation activities, even<br />

without direct evidence that the governments in question were proliferating that technology<br />

to terrorists. In 2002, it cited North Korea’s sales of missile technology to Libya and Syria; 113 the<br />

following year, it praised Libya for agreeing to give up its WMD programs. 114 In 2005, it cited<br />

Iran’s ability to produce chemical and biological weapons, speculating that Iran “could support<br />

terrorist organizations seeking to acquire WMD.” 115 The U.S. Government also believes that North<br />

Korea possesses, or is developing, nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons (supra Sections<br />

III.G; infra Sections V.A & V.B).<br />

112 U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on <strong>Terror</strong>ism 2007, 171.<br />

113 U.S. Department of State, Patterns of Global <strong>Terror</strong>ism: 2002, 81.<br />

114 U.S. Department of State, Patterns of Global <strong>Terror</strong>ism: 2003, 86, 91.<br />

115 U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on <strong>Terror</strong>ism 2005, 173.<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!