You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Committee for Human Rights in North Korea<br />
7. Other Conduct Cited<br />
Not all of the categories of conduct the U.S. State Department has cited in its country reports<br />
on the state sponsorship of terrorism fit within the definitions of “support,” “international terrorism,”<br />
or “terrorist activity.” The U.S. State Department’s reporting of this conduct has sometimes<br />
exceeded the reporting requirements of FRAA Section 140. The U.S. State Department may have<br />
reported this conduct in accordance with other policy considerations to support a government’s<br />
SSOT listing.<br />
For example, State has cited Iran, Syria, and North Korea for concerns about proliferation of<br />
nuclear and chemical weapons, and ballistic missiles. In explaining its rationale for including<br />
this conduct in its annual reporting, the State Department said the following:<br />
State sponsors of terrorism provide critical support to non-state<br />
terrorist groups. Without state sponsors, terrorist groups would have<br />
greater difficulty obtaining the funds, weapons, materials, and secure<br />
areas they require to plan and conduct operations. More worrisome is<br />
that some of these countries also have the capability to manufacture<br />
weapons of mass destruction (WMD) that could get into the hands of<br />
terrorists. The United States will continue to insist that these countries<br />
end the support they give to terrorist groups. 112<br />
State has historically reported on states’ WMD development and proliferation activities, even<br />
without direct evidence that the governments in question were proliferating that technology<br />
to terrorists. In 2002, it cited North Korea’s sales of missile technology to Libya and Syria; 113 the<br />
following year, it praised Libya for agreeing to give up its WMD programs. 114 In 2005, it cited<br />
Iran’s ability to produce chemical and biological weapons, speculating that Iran “could support<br />
terrorist organizations seeking to acquire WMD.” 115 The U.S. Government also believes that North<br />
Korea possesses, or is developing, nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons (supra Sections<br />
III.G; infra Sections V.A & V.B).<br />
112 U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on <strong>Terror</strong>ism 2007, 171.<br />
113 U.S. Department of State, Patterns of Global <strong>Terror</strong>ism: 2002, 81.<br />
114 U.S. Department of State, Patterns of Global <strong>Terror</strong>ism: 2003, 86, 91.<br />
115 U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on <strong>Terror</strong>ism 2005, 173.<br />
23