Krishna Yajur Veda

|| yo brahmANam vidadhAti poorvam yovai vedAnsca prahiNoti tasmai ||
"He, who created Brahma in the past, and who gifted him with the Vedas ..."
This clearly implies that the ParamAtma gifted the Vedas to Chaturmukha Brahma which existed without fixable
origin.
Again Sri Krishna says in 15.15 of the Bhagawad Geeta:
vedaisca sarvaih aham eva vedyo |
vedAntakrt vedavit eva ca aham ||
which roughly translates to:
"All the Vedas speak about me and I am the ONLY (eva) one who knows all the Vedas."
This is to be understood in terms of the cyclic creation and dissolution of cosmos. At the beginning of every cycle,
the supreme Lord transfers the knowledge of all previous cycles to the new Brahmav who then transfers it through
seers and sages in progressive steps for the benefit of the new creation.
Apaurusheyatva is a central concept in the Vedanta and Mimamsa schools of Hindu philosophy. These schools
accept the Vedas as svatah pramana ("self-evident means of knowledge"). These schools accept that the Vedas
were "heard" by the Rishis. Heard from whom? The answer has to be “from the supreme Spirit itself”. This will make
every knowledge as revelation from God which evidently is true in a sense. The science of today is revealed
knowledge from God to the seeker Scientist. In this sense every seeker of truth is a Rishi and God do not reveal
the full truth at once. This will give no additional status as a knowledge or Veda except that these are the primal
elementary knowledge given to man. In that case these revelations are abrogated by later revelations.
The strange argument of the Mimamsa school is that since the Vedas are composed of words (shabda) and the
words are composed of phonemes, the phonemes being eternal, the Vedas are also eternal, which of course does
not make any real sense. It only means that all knowledge is already inherent in nature to be learned. It does not
mean that it is known. To make it clear let us take the case of every scientific law. These laws are inherent on the
physical world though we do not know all of it. In time we discover them and then it becomes “knowledge”. All
human knowledge is the acumulated result of experience of generations from the beginning of time.
To put it in perspective. Consider Newton’s law of gravitation. The law was in effect since the beginning of the
material word. But it was made known by science through the vision and experience of Newton a person within
history at a particular time which was then codified and handed down through generations through teacher student
series.
The fact that we have no author to Vedas is stated by Hindu exponents as Hinduism has no founder. It is heard by
Rishis. This is sometimes interpreted as revelation from God himself identifying the Rishis with Prophets. However
the basic contention is that the Vedas were handed down from generation to generation without any particular
author for the sections. Yet the sections are assigned to familes of rishies who at least wrote them down or started
the verbal statements.
The eternity of Vedas can be simply the statement that the universe goes through cycles of creation and dissolution
and the knowledge of all the previous cycles are eventually rediscovered or heart by mankind in due course in its
due time.
As is evident from the discussion above, it appears that there is an inundation which seems to be intentionally
distorted to mean what it really is. Anyone who reads the Vedas can clearly see that it is an expression of humans
in the context of some higher power whom he is trying grapple. It does not provide at any point in the older texts to
point to divine origin or even divine teaching. Unless it is twisted around they don’t even point to a knowledge that