08.12.2012 Views

Doc 8585/147 Edition No. 147 / Édition n0147 / Edición num. 147 ...

Doc 8585/147 Edition No. 147 / Édition n0147 / Edición num. 147 ...

Doc 8585/147 Edition No. 147 / Édition n0147 / Edición num. 147 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Telephony designators<br />

ЕО-7<br />

3.1 Telephony designators for aircraft operating agencies may be used as part of the aircraft radiotelephony call sign<br />

followed by the flight identification in radiotelephony communications» in accordance with the ICAO Radiotelephony Procedures<br />

(Annex 10» Volume II» 5.2.1.7.2 refers). Example: "AEROFLOT 301".<br />

3.2 In the registration of telephony designators the following rules will apply;<br />

a) the telephony designator should resemble the name of the aircraft operating agency or its function and be distinct<br />

and dissimilar from any other telephony designators in <strong>Doc</strong> <strong>8585</strong>. Ideally it should reflect correlation between the<br />

three-letter designator» the telephony designator and the name of the aircraft operating agency or its function<br />

(examples: ARO - ARROW - Arrow Aviation; RAJ - RAJI - Raji Airlines);<br />

b) in order to reduce the length of transmission the telephony designator should be brief» comprising if possible one<br />

word of two or three syllables. It should not exceed two words;<br />

c) three-letter designators may not be used in phonetic form as telephony designators. However» telephony designators<br />

of long standing (such as KLM or TWA) may be retained» provided that an acceptable alphabetic representation is<br />

used (example: KAY-ELL-EMM); and<br />

d) the telephony designator should be easily and phonetically pronounceable in at least one of the following languages:<br />

English» French» Russian» Spanish.<br />

<strong>No</strong>te.— Resolution of similar sounding call-signs:<br />

1) In the interests of safety, simple procedures should be developed by States and aircraft operating agencies for<br />

detecting, reporting and eliminating those call signs which, because of their similarities to other call signs, may cause<br />

confusion or mistakes in identification. When call sign similarity difficulties concern the telephony designator, the civil<br />

aviation authority concerned should coordinate efforts to resolve the problem. This may require submission to ICAO<br />

for a change in one or both of the conflicting telephony designators. Cooperation between civil aviation authorities is<br />

required when the aircraft operating agencies are from different States.<br />

2) In the selection of the flight identification <strong>num</strong>ber the following is recommended:<br />

a) flight <strong>num</strong>bers should be kept as short as possible and usually be limited to three figures;<br />

b) flight <strong>num</strong>bers should be selected bearing in mind the flight <strong>num</strong>bers already in use by other operating agencies<br />

in the intended control environments; and<br />

c) when practicable flight <strong>num</strong>bers other than those ending in a zero or five should be used.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!