1U08p2c

Recommendations

Info

This work is part of the research programme of the UK Spatial Economics Research Centre funded by a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). The views expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the ESRC. © S. Franklin, submitted 2016
Enabled to Work: The Impact of Government Housing on Slum Dwellers in South Africa Simon Franklin* May 2016 * Spatial Economics Research Centre and London School of Economics This paper is a part of a Global Research Program on Spatial Development of Cities, funded by the Multi Donor Trust Fund on Sustainable Urbanization of the World Bank and supported by the UK Department for International Development. For their assistance in giving me access to specific household GIS data and an early release of the 5th wave of CAPS data, I’d like to thank Jeremy Seekings, Brendan Maughan-Brown and David Lam. Thank you to Magdalen College for providing a great deal of the funding that made possible my research in Cape Town. Thank you to Marcel Fafchamps for input, oversight and guidance of the project. Thank you to helpful seminar participants at the CSAE Conference, Oxford OXIGED housing workshop, as well various internal seminars in Oxford. In particular I thank Tony Venables, Stefan Dercon, Paul Collier, Somik Lall, John Muellbauer, Taryn Dinkelman, James Fenske, Simon Quinn, Francis Teal, Julien Labonne, & Kate Vyborny. I also thank two anonymous MPhil examiners for their detailed and useful comments.
Page 1: SERC DISCUSSION PAPER 197 Enabled t
Page 5 and 6: 1 Introduction Substandard housing
Page 7 and 8: elocation. 5 Secondly, I contribute
Page 9 and 10: ing standards, in situ approaches t
Page 11 and 12: Pharoah (2012) provides an overview
Page 13 and 14: of the household to seek employment
Page 15 and 16: geographical coordinates of the pro
Page 17 and 18: wave. 30 I created dummy variables
Page 19 and 20: households were not effected by dif
Page 21 and 22: I use an IV estimator adapted from
Page 23 and 24: In this section, I show the results
Page 25 and 26: that did not, by the final wave of
Page 27 and 28: approved but cancelled for bureaucr
Page 29 and 30: the estimated effect of housing, bu
Page 31 and 32: Table 6: Impacts on total income wi
Page 33 and 34: Paap F statistics for weak instrume
Page 35 and 36: Table 9: Effect of government housi
Page 37 and 38: Government housing reduces the prob
Page 39 and 40: I confirm that government housing h
Page 41 and 42: Table 14: Replication of the key re
Page 43 and 44: idence that the effects aren’t dr
Page 45 and 46: I show that the female household me
Page 47 and 48: Cattaneo, M.D., S. Galiani, Paul J
Page 49 and 50: Marx, Benjamin, Thomas Stoker, and
Page 51 and 52: A Additional information on first s
Page 53 and 54:
P(TD i = 0) = 4 ∏ t=1 A t ∏ a P
Page 55 and 56:
effects, the household fixed effect
Page 57 and 58:
B Additional Figures and Tables 54
Page 59 and 60:
Table 19: Household characteristics
Page 61 and 62:
Table 22: Impacts on young adult la
Page 63:
Spatial Economics Research Centre (
show all

1U08p2c

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?