1U08p2c

Recommendations

Info

Table 8: Impacts on male and female labour supply at the extensive margin (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) FE FE FD IV IV num % % num % employed employed employed employed employed Panel A: Employment among Female Household Members subhere 0.102* 0.0285 0.0842* 0.488** 0.325** (0.0532) (0.0291) (0.0451) (0.237) (0.144) Observations 2,471 2,471 1,237 2,459 2,458 R-squared 0.032 0.007 0.017 0.087 -0.017 Number of hhs 658 658 654 646 646 Av Group 3.755 3.755 1.891 3.807 3.805 HH Controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Weak IV F 96.03 86.43 Panel B: Employment among Male Household Members subhere 0.00256 -0.0200 -0.0497 0.0348 -0.0846 (0.0502) (0.0365) (0.0584) (0.234) (0.171) Observations 2,471 1,906 947 2,459 1,836 R-squared 0.023 0.014 0.013 0.191 0.059 Number of personid 658 609 589 646 539 Av Group 3.755 3.130 1.608 3.807 3.406 HH Controls Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Weak IV F 96.03 40.89 Notes: Clustered standard errors in parentheses.*** p
Table 9: Effect of government housing on hours worked per day (young adults) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) FE FE IV IV IV-Bal house 0.642** 0.599** 2.289* 2.482* 2.717* (0.252) (0.256) (1.346) (1.286) (1.480) HH Chars No Yes No Yes Yes Obs 1,630 1,605 1,295 1,293 969 Groups 821 813 502 501 356 Av Group 1.985 1.974 2.580 2.581 2.722 Weak IV F 17.20 21.38 9.232 Notes: Clustered standard errors in parentheses.*** p
Page 1 and 2: SERC DISCUSSION PAPER 197 Enabled t
Page 3 and 4: Enabled to Work: The Impact of Gove
Page 5 and 6: 1 Introduction Substandard housing
Page 7 and 8: elocation. 5 Secondly, I contribute
Page 9 and 10: ing standards, in situ approaches t
Page 11 and 12: Pharoah (2012) provides an overview
Page 13 and 14: of the household to seek employment
Page 15 and 16: geographical coordinates of the pro
Page 17 and 18: wave. 30 I created dummy variables
Page 19 and 20: households were not effected by dif
Page 21 and 22: I use an IV estimator adapted from
Page 23 and 24: In this section, I show the results
Page 25 and 26: that did not, by the final wave of
Page 27 and 28: approved but cancelled for bureaucr
Page 29 and 30: the estimated effect of housing, bu
Page 31 and 32: Table 6: Impacts on total income wi
Page 33: Paap F statistics for weak instrume
Page 37 and 38: Government housing reduces the prob
Page 39 and 40: I confirm that government housing h
Page 41 and 42: Table 14: Replication of the key re
Page 43 and 44: idence that the effects aren’t dr
Page 45 and 46: I show that the female household me
Page 47 and 48: Cattaneo, M.D., S. Galiani, Paul J
Page 49 and 50: Marx, Benjamin, Thomas Stoker, and
Page 51 and 52: A Additional information on first s
Page 53 and 54: P(TD i = 0) = 4 ∏ t=1 A t ∏ a P
Page 55 and 56: effects, the household fixed effect
Page 57 and 58: B Additional Figures and Tables 54
Page 59 and 60: Table 19: Household characteristics
Page 61 and 62: Table 22: Impacts on young adult la
Page 63: Spatial Economics Research Centre (

1U08p2c

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?