nature
defendingnature_tcm9-406638
defendingnature_tcm9-406638
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Nature and climate change<br />
Already, amazing species from corals to capercaillie<br />
are feeling the effects of climate change, including<br />
ocean acidification and loss of habitats and sources<br />
of food. Based on Intergovernmental Panel on<br />
Climate Change (IPCC) projections for global<br />
temperature rises, one in six species could be<br />
extinct by 2100. We need to limit climate change to<br />
save wildlife.<br />
But <strong>nature</strong> is also part of the answer. Nature is<br />
crucial in reducing climate change and increasing our<br />
resilience to its effects. Healthy ecosystems lock up<br />
carbon and help us adapt to change through services<br />
such as natural flood defences. Carbon stored in<br />
Natura 2000 sites is equivalent to 35 billion tonnes<br />
of CO 2 . Within Natura 2000 sites, carbon stocks are,<br />
on average, 42% higher per hectare than outside.<br />
That’s why it’s vital that the Nature Directives are<br />
“climate-compatible” and there’s clear evidence that<br />
they are. Protected sites provide natural networks<br />
that help species adapt. Healthy ecosystems in<br />
protected areas, and across the landscape, provide<br />
the kind of mitigation and adaptation needed to face<br />
climate change.<br />
Sometimes, of course, long-term needs for new<br />
infrastructure to decarbonise our economy will come<br />
into conflict with more immediate risks for <strong>nature</strong>. In<br />
these cases, a balance must be struck.<br />
It’s when the Directives aren’t adhered to that<br />
problems arise. Poor implementation can cause<br />
costs and risks. For example, insufficient monitoring<br />
at sea has affected the renewable energy sector,<br />
with offshore wind developers tied to specific<br />
zones, allocated without a proper assessment of<br />
environmental sensitivities. The Directives don’t<br />
need to be changed to be climate-compatible.<br />
They need to be implemented properly.<br />
Natura 2000: protected, not prohibited<br />
Natura 2000 designation does not mean a set of<br />
rigid prohibitions; it means an obligation to maintain<br />
or restore the quality of a site for the animals and<br />
plants for which they were designated.<br />
For most farmland designated as Natura 2000, the<br />
conservation aims are about maintaining traditional<br />
farm practices that already help these species.<br />
Natura 2000 designation can diversify farmers’<br />
income by tapping into the growing recreation and<br />
tourism market. Sustainable forest management<br />
is also usually compatible with the Natura 2000<br />
objectives, while large-scale clear-felling, plantations<br />
of exotic species, or removal of dead wood are not.<br />
Working together<br />
Working together helps ensure that one country<br />
cannot gain competitive advantage through the<br />
adoption of lower environmental standards, and that<br />
migratory species are not adversely affected by a<br />
single state allowing damaging development.<br />
Common standards in the EU have amplified<br />
our voice around the world. The Directives form<br />
the basis of EU negotiating positions, showing<br />
leadership and helping swing international decisions<br />
in favour of better environmental standards.<br />
To take one illustration, by voting as a bloc in the<br />
International Whaling Commission, with a strong<br />
precautionary position backed by EU legislation,<br />
we have prevented attempts to overturn the global<br />
moratorium on commercial whaling.<br />
Left: humpbacked whale – a species still at risk from hunting for “scientific purposes”.<br />
19