nature
defendingnature_tcm9-406638
defendingnature_tcm9-406638
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The myth of bats and newts<br />
Some species of plants and animals are given a high<br />
level of protection by the Habitats Directive because<br />
they are rare or restricted in their range. For some of<br />
these species, such as the great crested newt, the<br />
UK holds an internationally important proportion of<br />
their population. Many European Protected Species<br />
found in the UK such as newts, bats and dormice are<br />
often highly vulnerable to development and changes<br />
in land management.<br />
Frustration has been expressed at some of the<br />
challenges presented by this protection – for<br />
example, the issue of bats in churches, and the<br />
costs and delays sometimes associated with the<br />
discovery of great crested newts on land proposed<br />
for development.<br />
The actual number of developments affected by<br />
these issues is extremely small – but the frustrations<br />
are very real.<br />
The myth of bats and newts is that the only way<br />
to resolve these issues is to remove these species<br />
from the relevant annexes of the Birds and Habitats<br />
Directives. In reality, these issues can be resolved<br />
through smarter implementation without making<br />
any change to the Directives – which is good news<br />
for developers, who depend on the certainty the<br />
Directives provide, and for communities too. It is<br />
also good news for bats and great crested newts,<br />
which remain in need of protection (with bats<br />
showing early signs of recovery, while the status of<br />
great crested newts is so poorly understood that the<br />
most recent UK Government report lists their status<br />
as “unknown”).<br />
Better information: More information can help<br />
us understand where populations really do need<br />
protection. For example, Defra supported research<br />
on Natterer’s bats and soprano pipistrelle bats. It<br />
found that excluding Natterer’s bats from churches<br />
is likely to harm their Conservation Status,<br />
although with judicious use of deterrents under<br />
licence, problems caused by bats in churches can<br />
be mitigated. For soprano pipistrelles, however,<br />
it showed that they use alternative roosts when<br />
excluded from breeding roosts. Better information<br />
can also help businesses to plan their initial<br />
applications more judiciously, in order to avoid a<br />
problem in the first place.<br />
Favourable Conservation Status: Currently, most<br />
decisions involving a protected species follow a<br />
precautionary approach because the UK has not<br />
defined Favourable Conservation Status—what<br />
constitutes a healthy and sustainable population.<br />
There is, therefore, no sound basis on which to<br />
make judgements about the significance of any<br />
impacts on a population. In other EU countries, this<br />
issue has been addressed by defining objectives<br />
for European Protected Species. The difficulty here<br />
is not with the law, but with how we have chosen<br />
to implement the law. This was highlighted by a<br />
review of the Directives in England in 2012, and a<br />
Government-led great crested newt task force is<br />
already working to resolve these issues.<br />
Left: great crested newt. Poor implementation of the Habitats Directive make it a scapegoat.<br />
31