23.06.2016 Views

nature

defendingnature_tcm9-406638

defendingnature_tcm9-406638

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

References<br />

i<br />

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/317/5839/810.abstract<br />

ii<br />

Gillingham et al. 2015. The effectiveness of protected areas in the conservation of species with changing geographical<br />

ranges. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society; Pellissier et al (2013: Animal Conservation 16: 566-574)<br />

iii<br />

Donald et al (2007: Science 317: 810-813)<br />

iv<br />

http://issuu.com/wildlifetrusts/docs/<strong>nature</strong>_and_wellbeing_act_final?e=4558523/9971297#search<br />

v<br />

Eurobarometer (2010). Attitudes of Europeans towards the issue of biodiversity. Analytical report Wave 2. http://<br />

ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_290_en.pdf<br />

vi<br />

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:C:1975:060:FULL&from=EN<br />

vii<br />

http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_416_en.pdf<br />

viii<br />

Maes J, ML Paracchini, G Zulian, MB Dunbar, and R Alkemade. 2012. “Synergies and Trade-Offs between Ecosystem<br />

Service Supply, Biodiversity, and Habitat Conservation Status in Europe.” Biological Conservation 155 (October): 1–12;<br />

Clark NE, Lovell R, Wheeler BW, Higgins SL and Depledge MH (2014). Biodiversity, cultural pathways, and human health:<br />

a framework. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29: 198-204.<br />

ix<br />

Eastwood et al. (2013). Nature conservation and ecosystem service delivery. JNCC Report No. 492; Maes et al (2012).<br />

Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe.<br />

Biological conservation, 155, 1-12<br />

x<br />

GHK et al (2010) Economic Benefits of Environmental Policy. Report for DG Environment<br />

xi<br />

Kettunen M, Baldock D, Adelle C, Cooper T, Farmer M, Hart K, Torkler P.(2009b). Biodiversity and the EU Budget – an<br />

IEEP briefing paper. Institute for European Environmental Policy, London / Brussels; http://ec.europa.eu/environment/<br />

<strong>nature</strong>/natura2000/financing/docs/ENV-12-018_LR_Final1.pdf<br />

xii<br />

Lovell R, Wheeler B, Higgins SL, Irvine KN and Depledge MH (2014). A systematic review of the health and wellbeing<br />

benefits of bio diverse environments. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B: Critical Reviews, 17: 1-20;<br />

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041614001648<br />

xiii<br />

Sundseth, K., & Raeymaekers, G. (2006). Biodiversity and Natura 2000 in urban areas: Nature in cities across Europe<br />

– a review of key issues and experiences. Brussels, Ecosystems Ltd., Brussels. http://www.forumtools.biz/Fedenatur/<br />

upload/N2000inmajorEuropeancities.pdf<br />

xiv<br />

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-costs-and-benefits-of-defra-s-regulations; https://www.gov.uk/<br />

government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69226/pb13623-costs-benefits-defra-regulatory-stock110816.<br />

pdf<br />

xv<br />

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/291631/scho0409bpvm-e-e.pdf; http://<br />

www.rspb.org.uk/whatwedo/campaigningfor<strong>nature</strong>/casework/details.aspx?id=tcm:9-235089<br />

xvi<br />

McCarthy, D. & Morling, P. (2014). A Guidance Manual for Assessing Ecosystem Services at Natura 2000 Sites; Mace<br />

et al (2012). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends in ecology & evolution, 27(1), 19-26.<br />

xvii<br />

Natural Capital Committee, The State of Natural Capital: protecting and improving natural capital for prosperity and<br />

wellbeing, Third Report to the Economic Affairs Committee<br />

xviii<br />

Balmford et al. (2004). The worldwide costs of marine protected areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of<br />

Sciences of the United States of America, 101(26), 9694-9697.<br />

xix<br />

Jacob et al (2009). Environment and the Single Market. Final Report to the European Commission.<br />

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enveco/economics_policy/pdf/single_market.pdf<br />

xx<br />

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/files/file44583.pdf<br />

xxi<br />

High level group on administrative burdens (2014) Cutting Red Tape in Europe Brussels, 24 July 2014 Legacy and<br />

outlook p.33 http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/refit/admin_burden/docs/08-10web_ce-brocuttingredtape_en.pdf;<br />

European Commission (2012) Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the EU Final Report<br />

xxii<br />

DEFRA. (2015). Emerging Findings from Defra’s Regulation Assessment: First Update Covering 2012. https://www.<br />

gov.uk/government/publications/the-costs-and-benefits-of-defra-s-regulations<br />

xxiii<br />

Dechezleprêtre A, & Sato M. (2014). The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness – Grantham<br />

Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Policy Brief; Kozluk, T. & Zipperer, V. (2014). Environmental<br />

policies and productivity growth: a critical review of empirical findings. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, Vol. 1. OECD<br />

Paris; Albrizio, S. et al. (2014). Do environmental policies matter for productivity growth? Insights from new cross-country<br />

measures of environmental policies. OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 1176.<br />

xxiv<br />

High Level Group on Administrative Burdens. (2011). Europe can do better. Report on best practice in Member States<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!