nature
defendingnature_tcm9-406638
defendingnature_tcm9-406638
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
References<br />
i<br />
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/317/5839/810.abstract<br />
ii<br />
Gillingham et al. 2015. The effectiveness of protected areas in the conservation of species with changing geographical<br />
ranges. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society; Pellissier et al (2013: Animal Conservation 16: 566-574)<br />
iii<br />
Donald et al (2007: Science 317: 810-813)<br />
iv<br />
http://issuu.com/wildlifetrusts/docs/<strong>nature</strong>_and_wellbeing_act_final?e=4558523/9971297#search<br />
v<br />
Eurobarometer (2010). Attitudes of Europeans towards the issue of biodiversity. Analytical report Wave 2. http://<br />
ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_290_en.pdf<br />
vi<br />
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:C:1975:060:FULL&from=EN<br />
vii<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_416_en.pdf<br />
viii<br />
Maes J, ML Paracchini, G Zulian, MB Dunbar, and R Alkemade. 2012. “Synergies and Trade-Offs between Ecosystem<br />
Service Supply, Biodiversity, and Habitat Conservation Status in Europe.” Biological Conservation 155 (October): 1–12;<br />
Clark NE, Lovell R, Wheeler BW, Higgins SL and Depledge MH (2014). Biodiversity, cultural pathways, and human health:<br />
a framework. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29: 198-204.<br />
ix<br />
Eastwood et al. (2013). Nature conservation and ecosystem service delivery. JNCC Report No. 492; Maes et al (2012).<br />
Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe.<br />
Biological conservation, 155, 1-12<br />
x<br />
GHK et al (2010) Economic Benefits of Environmental Policy. Report for DG Environment<br />
xi<br />
Kettunen M, Baldock D, Adelle C, Cooper T, Farmer M, Hart K, Torkler P.(2009b). Biodiversity and the EU Budget – an<br />
IEEP briefing paper. Institute for European Environmental Policy, London / Brussels; http://ec.europa.eu/environment/<br />
<strong>nature</strong>/natura2000/financing/docs/ENV-12-018_LR_Final1.pdf<br />
xii<br />
Lovell R, Wheeler B, Higgins SL, Irvine KN and Depledge MH (2014). A systematic review of the health and wellbeing<br />
benefits of bio diverse environments. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B: Critical Reviews, 17: 1-20;<br />
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041614001648<br />
xiii<br />
Sundseth, K., & Raeymaekers, G. (2006). Biodiversity and Natura 2000 in urban areas: Nature in cities across Europe<br />
– a review of key issues and experiences. Brussels, Ecosystems Ltd., Brussels. http://www.forumtools.biz/Fedenatur/<br />
upload/N2000inmajorEuropeancities.pdf<br />
xiv<br />
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-costs-and-benefits-of-defra-s-regulations; https://www.gov.uk/<br />
government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69226/pb13623-costs-benefits-defra-regulatory-stock110816.<br />
pdf<br />
xv<br />
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/291631/scho0409bpvm-e-e.pdf; http://<br />
www.rspb.org.uk/whatwedo/campaigningfor<strong>nature</strong>/casework/details.aspx?id=tcm:9-235089<br />
xvi<br />
McCarthy, D. & Morling, P. (2014). A Guidance Manual for Assessing Ecosystem Services at Natura 2000 Sites; Mace<br />
et al (2012). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends in ecology & evolution, 27(1), 19-26.<br />
xvii<br />
Natural Capital Committee, The State of Natural Capital: protecting and improving natural capital for prosperity and<br />
wellbeing, Third Report to the Economic Affairs Committee<br />
xviii<br />
Balmford et al. (2004). The worldwide costs of marine protected areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of<br />
Sciences of the United States of America, 101(26), 9694-9697.<br />
xix<br />
Jacob et al (2009). Environment and the Single Market. Final Report to the European Commission.<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enveco/economics_policy/pdf/single_market.pdf<br />
xx<br />
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121212135622/http://www.bis.gov.uk/files/file44583.pdf<br />
xxi<br />
High level group on administrative burdens (2014) Cutting Red Tape in Europe Brussels, 24 July 2014 Legacy and<br />
outlook p.33 http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/refit/admin_burden/docs/08-10web_ce-brocuttingredtape_en.pdf;<br />
European Commission (2012) Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the EU Final Report<br />
xxii<br />
DEFRA. (2015). Emerging Findings from Defra’s Regulation Assessment: First Update Covering 2012. https://www.<br />
gov.uk/government/publications/the-costs-and-benefits-of-defra-s-regulations<br />
xxiii<br />
Dechezleprêtre A, & Sato M. (2014). The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness – Grantham<br />
Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Policy Brief; Kozluk, T. & Zipperer, V. (2014). Environmental<br />
policies and productivity growth: a critical review of empirical findings. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, Vol. 1. OECD<br />
Paris; Albrizio, S. et al. (2014). Do environmental policies matter for productivity growth? Insights from new cross-country<br />
measures of environmental policies. OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 1176.<br />
xxiv<br />
High Level Group on Administrative Burdens. (2011). Europe can do better. Report on best practice in Member States<br />
42