23.06.2016 Views

TSAWTB Section 6 - Interlude - A Miscellany of Items

True Science Agrees with the Bible, Section 6 - Interlude - A Miscellany of Items (pp. 250-288)

True Science Agrees with the Bible, Section 6 - Interlude - A Miscellany of Items (pp. 250-288)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

262 <strong>Section</strong> 6 - <strong>Interlude</strong><br />

In his introduction to this, Fawkes describes the person as “the lady who had<br />

nursed Darwin”, but then describes her as one who “had been in attendance”.<br />

Moore contends this is Lady Hope, but Cr<strong>of</strong>t says it is probably a Mrs. Evans<br />

who “had been with the Darwin household as a nurse for many years”.<br />

(Another writer says she was the cook. Actually she was the old housekeeper).<br />

Which is correct - was it Lady Hope or a lady in the house?<br />

In her account Lady Hope was not asked to read to him and she does not<br />

mention a specific hymn he requested. Cr<strong>of</strong>t notes that Mrs. Evans was a<br />

member <strong>of</strong> the Gospel Room congregation and could easily arrange for the<br />

children to sing. However, there is no record <strong>of</strong> this taking place.<br />

The crucial point is not who this lady was, but that Nicholls heard <strong>of</strong><br />

Darwin’s change. If it was Lady Hope, then he must have heard <strong>of</strong> this soon<br />

after the event as probably she was not in the area for long. If it was another<br />

lady, then this would be a totally independent witness from Lady Hope.<br />

Nicholls’ account is so close to Darwin’s home that it gives support to the<br />

story, no matter by what route it came to him.<br />

(C) Sir Robert Anderson<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the most interesting references Moore mentions involves Sir Robert<br />

Anderson who was the head <strong>of</strong> the C.I.D. at Scotland Yard during the time <strong>of</strong><br />

the investigation <strong>of</strong> the “Jack the Ripper Murders”. He was a well known<br />

evangelical, and a very close friend <strong>of</strong> Lady Hope. Obviously referring to Lady<br />

Hope, he wrote as early as 1907:<br />

..a friend <strong>of</strong> mine who was much with Darwin during his last<br />

illness assures me that he expressed the greatest reverence for the<br />

scriptures and bore testimony to their value (M:48).<br />

This is an important comment which we discuss later.<br />

3. There were accounts circulating unconnected with her<br />

Moore gives several <strong>of</strong> these incidents.<br />

(A) May 1882 - only eight months after her visit and one month after<br />

Darwin’s death in April. A preacher, Mr. Huntingdon, at Tenby refers to<br />

Darwin “in his last utterances confessed his true faith.” Tenby “had been the<br />

home <strong>of</strong> Emma Darwin’s (Charles’s wife) Allen aunts; the Darwin’s first<br />

cousin, the Rev. John Allen Wedgewood, still lived there.”<br />

Moore (p71) speculates that “perhaps clerical chit-chat got worked into the<br />

sermon”. This is an interesting account, for, chit-chat or not, here we have a<br />

direct connection between the Darwin family and a report <strong>of</strong> a “recantation”,<br />

and Lady Hope is not involved. If Huntingdon had fabricated his anecdote,<br />

his close neighbour would surely have heard <strong>of</strong> it and sharply corrected the<br />

record. This is surely <strong>of</strong> some value as independent evidence that there had<br />

been a “recantation” <strong>of</strong> some sort!<br />

(B) September 1882. Robert Eadie F.R.G.S. is said to have sent to the<br />

Darwin family, who were collecting his letters for publication, a note he had<br />

received from Darwin in which he said that “he [Darwin] can with confidence<br />

look to Calvary”. No letter from Eadie ever appeared in the published letters<br />

<strong>of</strong> Darwin (M:73) - which is not surprising in view <strong>of</strong> its explosive content.<br />

(C) 1928. Ivor Panin (See Appendix 7) received information by a circuitous<br />

route that an Oxford pr<strong>of</strong>essor had received a letter from Darwin, whom he<br />

claimed was a close friend, saying he had become a firm Christian. The<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essor had commented that, “The position is odd as both his son and<br />

grandson deny his Christianity” (M:85). His acknowledgement that the letter

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!