23.06.2016 Views

TSAWTB Section 6 - Interlude - A Miscellany of Items

True Science Agrees with the Bible, Section 6 - Interlude - A Miscellany of Items (pp. 250-288)

True Science Agrees with the Bible, Section 6 - Interlude - A Miscellany of Items (pp. 250-288)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

256 <strong>Section</strong> 6 - <strong>Interlude</strong><br />

Eakman in her Educating for the New World Order (Eak).<br />

This technique is set out in some Rand research documents, funded by the<br />

American taxpayer, that show how to bring about changes in education. The<br />

method consists <strong>of</strong> inviting the help <strong>of</strong> a “technical assistant” or “facilitator”<br />

usually drawn from the ranks <strong>of</strong> those in the behavioural sciences and<br />

colleges. He first gathers around him people interested in the particular<br />

change proposed, making himself a friend <strong>of</strong> both those for and those against<br />

the idea. The purpose is to get to know their attitudes and reactions, strengths<br />

and weaknesses.<br />

When the time is right, he then sets the “pro” group against the “con” group<br />

and uses the resulting “escalation <strong>of</strong> tension” for his own purposes. The “pro”<br />

group are promoted in importance, whilst the “con” group are made to seem<br />

“ridiculous, unknowledgable, dogmatic or inarticulate” and they are shut out<br />

<strong>of</strong> any publicity given to the subject. Eakman comments:<br />

And the targets rarely, if ever, know they are being manipulated. Or,<br />

if they suspect, they don’t know how (Eak:128).<br />

This technique may not strictly apply to the creation movement, but we can<br />

expect to be infiltrated by those pr<strong>of</strong>essing to be creationists. They may be on<br />

committees and have inside knowledge <strong>of</strong> what creationists intend to do. They<br />

will have much media attention and act as spokesmen, but when there is a<br />

need for speaking out clearly on behalf <strong>of</strong> creationism, they will be found to<br />

suddenly fail. For example, an important court case may be led by them but at<br />

the crucial point they will present the issues so incompetently that the case<br />

will be lost.<br />

Claims such as these may be thought exaggerated, but those who have had<br />

to deal with strong opposition to the creationist cause can tell <strong>of</strong> the<br />

underhand activities that they have been subjected to. The Christian should<br />

always be “as gentle as doves”, but we have been warned that with it we<br />

should also be “as wise as serpents” (Matt. 10:16).<br />

SECTION 6.5<br />

THE BARRIERS TO MASS PUBLICITY<br />

It is evident that the true Christian faith gets not just no publicity but<br />

considerable ridicule on TV and in many major papers and magazines. In<br />

plays, the vicar is <strong>of</strong>ten portrayed as either weak and timid or bold and<br />

bombastic. The only Christian services that are presented are either very highly<br />

emotionally charged or the very orderly high ritual <strong>of</strong> the older denominations.<br />

How many times has the real gospel been presented in any section <strong>of</strong> the<br />

British mass media?<br />

I have been speaking and writing on the subject <strong>of</strong> the scientific evidence<br />

against evolution and for creation since 1969, and occasionally, after giving a<br />

lecture, an enthusiastic young person might come up and say that he had never<br />

heard this evidence before, and that this should be on the TV - “as they have<br />

special programmes for people like you with unusual ideas.”, etc.<br />

My reply is to encourage them to write to the TV company, but I warn them<br />

<strong>of</strong> the response that they will get. They will receive a polite letter explaining<br />

why they do not think that the subject is “appropriate” or they have taken the<br />

advice <strong>of</strong> experts (evolutionists <strong>of</strong> course!) who do not consider the case has<br />

any support from “senior members <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ession” - or some such excuse.<br />

If the recipient is not satisfied with the reasons given he might write again, but

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!