11.07.2016 Views

004_ACC_April_2016

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BACK<br />

A review hearing must be conducted unless an<br />

application is withdrawn or all those entitled to be<br />

heard agree not to have a hearing.<br />

The hearing must be held at a time and place<br />

agreed to by all parties to the application (if the<br />

application is made by an injured employee this<br />

does not include the employer) and by the reviewer.<br />

If the parties to the application cannot agree, then<br />

the reviewer must decide when and where the<br />

review hearing will be held.<br />

A reviewer must take all practicable steps to ensure<br />

notice is given to everyone entitled to be present and<br />

heard at least seven days prior to a hearing. Where<br />

the applicant is an injured employee, this will include<br />

the employer, see below.<br />

Those entitled to be present at a review hearing with<br />

a representative, if they want to be are:<br />

• the applicant and the Corporation;<br />

• a registered heath professional or<br />

organisation whose inaction or action is<br />

the basis for a claim of medical error;<br />

• a registered health professional or<br />

organisation (as above) where the<br />

applicant is a treatment provider; or:<br />

if the review relates to a decision to accept or decline<br />

cover for a work-related personal injury:<br />

•the claimant;<br />

• the claimant’s employer; and<br />

• in the case of a gradual process claim, any<br />

employer whose name the reviewer receives<br />

from the claimant, from the claimant’s employer,<br />

or from the Corporation. (Any other employer<br />

or former employer of the claimant is to be<br />

given seven days’ notice of the hearing.)<br />

Persons present at a hearing can either speak for<br />

themselves or through their representative.<br />

A reviewer must make a review decision within<br />

28 days after:<br />

• the day on which the hearing finishes;<br />

• if there is no hearing, on the day the<br />

applicant, the Corporation and all persons<br />

who would have been entitled to be present<br />

and heard agree not to have a hearing;<br />

• if no such date has been specified, the day on<br />

which it was agreed not to have a hearing.<br />

A review decision must:<br />

• be in writing;<br />

• give reasons; and<br />

• contain information about the right of appeal.<br />

The reviewer must, as soon as practicable, give<br />

a copy of the decision to the applicant and the<br />

Corporation and to any other person entitled to be<br />

present and heard at the hearing who was present.<br />

If someone entitled to be present at the hearing was<br />

not present, the reviewer need only provide a copy of<br />

the decision on request.<br />

The Corporation must supply a copy of a review<br />

decision to anyone who asks for it, but must<br />

ensure the decision contains no information<br />

identifying any individual. It may charge a fee for<br />

doing so but no greater than the cost of preparing<br />

and supplying the decision.<br />

In making a decision a reviewer must disregard the<br />

Corporation’s decision and look at the matter afresh<br />

on the basis of the information provided at the review.<br />

The reviewer must also put aside the Corporation’s<br />

policy and procedure and make a decision solely on<br />

the basis of the substantive merits of the case under<br />

the Act. If the review concerns a decision revised by<br />

the Corporation, the Corporation must establish that<br />

the original decision was made in error.<br />

The reviewer must keep an accurate record of<br />

evidence for at least two years.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!