004_ACC_April_2016
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
BACK<br />
Except for first week compensation, these kinds<br />
of motor vehicle accident injuries will be funded<br />
from the Motor Vehicle Account, not from the Work<br />
Account (see under ‘Motor Vehicle Account’ heading).<br />
Heart attacks and strokes<br />
Cardio-vascular or cerebro-vascular episodes (heart<br />
attacks or strokes) are work-related if caused by<br />
physical effort or physical strain experienced by the<br />
employee in the course of employment. The physical<br />
effort or strain will be excessive or abnormal for the<br />
particular employee, even though another employee<br />
would not have found it too great.<br />
Medical treatment of<br />
work-related injury<br />
Treatment for a work-related injury where the<br />
treatment results in an injured employee suffering<br />
further injury, (the injury is a treatment injury as<br />
per section 32), will also be treated as a work injury.<br />
This not only applies to hospital treatment but to<br />
treatment given by any registered health professional<br />
such as an occupational health nurse acting in the<br />
workplace on the employer’s behalf.<br />
Gradual process, disease,<br />
or infection<br />
Gradual process, disease, or infection resulting in<br />
injury will be work-related if the employment involves<br />
or used to involve exposure to certain agents, dust,<br />
compounds, substances or radiation, and the disease<br />
contracted is one of the occupational diseases listed in<br />
Schedule 2 of the Act (set out in the appendix to these<br />
guidelines). It will also be work related if the employee<br />
is employed in an occupation, industry, or process<br />
described in Schedule 2. An employee who contracts<br />
such a disease while working (or having worked) in an<br />
industry or occupation where listed substances are<br />
used, or where the disease is known to occur, does<br />
not have to establish that it was caused by the work<br />
performed (see below). The fact that the employee<br />
worked in such circumstances is sufficient to put the<br />
disease into the ‘work-related’ category. Under section<br />
30(4A) cover will only exist if the exposure occurred in<br />
New Zealand or the person was ordinarily resident in<br />
New Zealand when the exposure occurred.<br />
Other gradual process injuries and infections need<br />
to meet certain criteria to be considered work related.<br />
There are two different tests, depending on when the<br />
injury occurred.<br />
INJURIES OCCURRING BETWEEN 1 AUGUST<br />
2008 AND 30 JUNE 2010<br />
The employment task must have (or have had) a<br />
particular property or characteristic causing, or<br />
contributing to the cause of the personal injury. For<br />
the period between 1 August 2008 and 30 June 2010,<br />
the claimant must establish that it is more likely the<br />
personal injury was caused by the employment tasks<br />
or environment, than by their non-employment<br />
activities or environment.<br />
However, despite that threshold being reached,<br />
the Corporation has the discretion to decline the<br />
claim if the Corporation establishes the risk of<br />
suffering the personal injury is not significantly<br />
greater for persons who:<br />
• perform that employment task than<br />
for persons who do not, or<br />
• are employed in that type of environment<br />
than for persons who are not<br />
INJURIES OCCURRING BEFORE 1 AUGUST<br />
2008, OR AFTER 1 JULY 2010<br />
For gradual process injuries which occurred before<br />
1 August 2008, or after 1 July 2010, a more stringent<br />
test must be satisfied for the injury to be considered<br />
work related. There is the same requirement that the<br />
employment task must have (or have had) a particular<br />
property or characteristic causing, or contributing to<br />
the cause of, the personal injury. However this must<br />
be a property or characteristic not found to any great<br />
extent in employee’s non-employment activities<br />
or environment. For the gradual process injury to<br />
be considered work related it must be shown that<br />
the risk of suffering the gradual process injury is<br />
significantly greater for persons who:<br />
• perform that employment task than<br />
for persons who do not, or<br />
• are employed in that type of environment<br />
than for persons who are not.<br />
Injuries that can be attributed to workplace airconditioning<br />
systems and passive smoking are<br />
classified as work-related gradual process injuries.<br />
6