04.08.2016 Views

NO ONE LEFT BEHIND

NY-Events-Report_WEB

NY-Events-Report_WEB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The diversity of actors involved in an intervention in<br />

current contexts and their different interests—often<br />

conflicting—is one of the dimensions that needs more<br />

attention. This is especially true given the importance<br />

of “hearing all voices” and building a vision and agreement<br />

on the assessments made. Evaluation design<br />

needs to take into account in-depth understanding of<br />

local contexts. It also needs to be fully-customized and<br />

context specific. It is essential to understand local scenarios<br />

and how they interact with global processes, as<br />

this allows evaluators to understand how the “global”<br />

is manifested in the local. In addition, understanding<br />

the role of the environment in each process and its<br />

relationship with the population is key—especially for<br />

the most disadvantaged populations. Methods that<br />

advocate horizontal evaluation processes and encourage<br />

dialogues with various actors and reflection with<br />

the population are critical.<br />

A multi-layer, multi-dimensional and multi-method<br />

approach is needed to address complexity of interventions.<br />

Monitoring has a privileged place in the context<br />

of interventions in complex environments. Monitoring<br />

requires one to pay attention to the story, patterns,<br />

events and simple numbers that are used to measure<br />

things. Participatory monitoring with different stakeholders<br />

is particularly important in evaluations of<br />

complex programmes.<br />

Theory of change of localized SDGs will need to consider<br />

the complexity of programmes. However, theory<br />

of change may not capture all aspects. Therefore evaluation<br />

designs, evaluation methods and processes need<br />

to be concise to capture different dimensions of the<br />

programme and complexity.<br />

National evaluation policies and systems<br />

National M&E systems should focus on the SDGs as<br />

they cover all aspects of interventions. National evaluation<br />

policies are key in all countries. According to the<br />

Global Study on Mapping National Evaluation Policies,<br />

only 20 countries have formalized national evaluation<br />

policies. And of those existing policies, only a few<br />

include equity and/or gender equality provisions. For<br />

example, Kenya, Nepal and Zimbabwe include some<br />

gender equality aspects in their national evaluation<br />

policies and Afghanistan includes an equity-focused<br />

and gender-responsive section.<br />

Countries such as Mexico, Chile, Colombia and South<br />

Africa have strong national evaluation systems and<br />

Malaysia has a strong results-based planning, budgeting<br />

and monitoring system. However, these systems<br />

need to strengthen equity-focused and gender-responsive<br />

aspects in evaluation. Currently, the main focus in<br />

many countries is on financial monitoring rather than<br />

results. The government capacity to plan, commission,<br />

disseminate and use evaluations needs to be increased.<br />

Moving beyond financial monitoring requires<br />

capacity to lobby evaluation, capacity to manage the<br />

evaluation process, capacity of individual evaluators to<br />

successfully conduct evaluations and capacity to use<br />

evaluations. Peer learning from successful national<br />

evaluation systems needs to be strengthened.<br />

Localizing SDG indicators<br />

All countries need to work on localized SDG indicators,<br />

monitoring data collection and evaluation of SDGs.<br />

The 230 global indicators cover all 169 SDG targets,<br />

which helps countries measure their own progress<br />

of indicators. The discussion on localizing indicators<br />

needs wider stakeholder consultation. It is also needed<br />

to identify targets, data needs, data sources and who is<br />

finally managing indicators at the national level.<br />

Demand for and use of evidence from<br />

equity-focused and gender-responsive<br />

evaluation to inform equitable development<br />

Political will is key in any country in order to strengthen<br />

evaluation culture. Parliamentarians and political leaders<br />

need to demand high-quality evaluations in order<br />

to make policy decisions and allocate resources for<br />

development interventions. Evaluation reports can<br />

be key information sources for parliament debates,<br />

committee meetings and cabinet papers. For this,<br />

Evaluating the Sustainable Development Goals with<br />

an Equity-focused and Gender-responsive Lens 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!